Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
46 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Family Resemblance |
Members of a category resemble one another Not necessarily all or none, just relies on some number of features being shared by any group of category members even if they aren't shared by all members |
|
Prototype Theory |
Mental categories are represented by means of a single "best example" identifying the center of the category Provide an economical representation of twhat's typical for the category |
|
Graded Membership |
Objects closer to the prototype are better members of the category than objects farther from the prototype |
|
Sentence Verification Task |
Participants given simple sentences and must respond as quickly as possible whether the sentence is true or false According to a prototype perspective, participants choose their response by comparing the mentioned thing to their prototype for that category |
|
Production Task |
The person is asked to name as many examples of a category as possible They'll start with the center of the category and work their way outward from there |
|
Rating Tasks |
Participants must evaluate some item or category with reference to some dimension, usually expressing their response in terms of some number |
|
Basic-level categorization |
A level of categorization hypothesized as the natural and most informative level, neither too specific nor too general People tend to use basic-level terms in their ordinary conversation and in reasoning |
|
Exemplar-based reasoning |
Reasoning that draws on knowledge about specific category members, rather than on more general information about the overall category (prototype) |
|
Exemplar |
A specific remembered instance Provide information that's lost from the prototype including info about the variability within the category |
|
Similarities between prototype and exemplar theories |
In both proposals, you categorize objects by comparing them to a mentally represented standard The process is the same: You assess the similarity between a candidate object and the standard |
|
Differences between prototype and exemplar theories |
For prototype theory, the standard is the prototype (average representing the entire category) For exemplar theory, the standard is provided by whatever example of the category comes to mind |
|
Typicality |
The degree to which a particular case is typical for its kind |
|
Propositions |
Smallest units of knowledge that can be either true or false |
|
Natural Kinds |
Groups of objects that exist naturally in the world (bushes, aligators, mountains, rocks) As they are due to forces of nature which are relatively consistent so the properties of these objects are stable |
|
Artifacts |
Objects made by human beings |
|
Morphemes |
Smallest language unit that carries meaning (basically the root part of a word i.e. talked would be talk) |
|
Phonemes |
Smallest units of sound used to distinguish meaning (what it sounds like phonetically i.e. talk would be tok) |
|
Vocal folds |
Two flaps of muscular tissue in the larynx that can be rapidly opened or closed to produce buzzing called voicing |
|
manner of production |
How the airflow in the larynx is restricted, used to distinguish sounds (can be fully stopped to produce t or b sound or can be restricted to produce f and z sounds) |
|
Place of articulation |
Categorizing sounds based on where the airflow is restricted |
|
Bilabial Sounds |
Close lips, produces sounds like b and p |
|
Labiodental Sounds |
Placing top teeth on lower lip, produces sounds like f and v |
|
Alveolar Sounds |
Placing tongue just behind upper teeth, produces sounds like d and t |
|
Number of phenomes in English |
Around 40, created by combining the 3 sound types |
|
Speech segmentation |
A stream of speech is "sliced" into its constituent words and into its constituent phenomes |
|
Coarticulation |
Way a sound is produced is altered slightly by the immediately preceding and immediately following words |
|
Phonemic Restoration Effect |
Pattern in which people hear phenomes that are not actually present but highly likely in that context |
|
Categorical Perception |
People are much better at hearing the differences between categories of sound than they are at hearing the variations within a category of sound |
|
Generativity of Language |
Capacity to create an endless series of new combinations all from the same set of fundamental units |
|
Syntax |
Rules governing the sequence of words in a phrase or sentence |
|
Phrase structure rules |
Stipulations that list the elements that must appear in a phrase and (for some languages) specify the sequences of those phrases Also determine overall organization of sentence |
|
Tree structure |
Method of depicting the phrase structure rules in a tree like diagram |
|
Perspective rules |
Rules describing how language is supposed to be (phrase structure rules are descriptive not perspective) |
|
Descriptive rules |
Rules describing how language is ordinarily used not how it is supposed to be used (i.e.phrase structure rules) |
|
Sentence Parsing |
People seek to parse sentences as soon as they hear them, trying to figure out the role of each word as soon as it arrives Is efficient but can lead to many errors, early part of sentences are often ambiguous but the later part clears it up |
|
Garden Paths |
Initially led to one interpretation but this interpretation turns out to be wrong Need to reject your first and seek another Leads to a double-take reaction when late arriving info forces you to abandon your initial efforts |
|
Extralinguistic context |
The physical and social setting in which you encounter sentences |
|
Prosody |
The rise and fall of speech intonation and the patterns of pauses Can reveal the mood of the speaker as well as direct attention to certain parts of sentences |
|
Pragmatics |
Knowledge of how language is ordinarily used |
|
Aphasia |
Damage to specific parts of the brain cause a disruption in language production and/or comprehension |
|
Non-fluent Aphasia |
Occurs as a result of damage to Broca's Area Adequate verbal comprehension but unable to produce language |
|
Fluent Aphasia |
Damage to Wernicke's Area Able to talk freely but dont make sense |
|
Specific Language Impairment (SLI) |
Syndrome in which individuals seem to have normal intelligence but have trouble learning the rules of language |
|
Over-regularization errors |
An error in which a person perceives a word/event as being closer to the norm than it really is Runned instead of ran |
|
Semantic Bootstrapping |
Process in language in which a person uses knowledge of semantic relationships as the basis for figuring out the syntax of the language |
|
Linguistic Relativity |
The language you speak forces you into certain modes of thought People who speak a different language than you inevitably think differently from you |