• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

what is the assumption w/ basic emotion approaches?

variability in emotional responding results from phenomenal social factors, like display rules

appraisal approaches

emotional responses arise from analyzing the meaning of a situation; differing analysis accounts for emotional variability

social constructionist approach to emotion

emotional responses are formed by interactions with surrounding people; emotional variability due to differing interactions (especially culturally)

psychological constructionist approaches to emotion (peripheralist)

psychological events of emotion are mental events that result from the interplay of evolved, basic psychological ingredients

conceptual act model

categorization is central; emotional word (e.g. fear) corresponds to common-sense category, consisting of range of mental events. these events are formed from with basic psyc ingredients

what is the conceptual act model grounded in?

observation that every moment results from a combo of three sources of stimulation

what are the 3 combinations of source stimulation that make up the basic psychological ingredients of mental life? (EIP)

sensations by..


1. external world (light)


2. inner body (aka internal milieu)


3. prior experience, made available by brain activation and inhibition

what is the first hypothesis of the conceptual act model?

mental events, aka ‘‘emotion’’, are constructed from the 3 psychologically primitive ingredients (not reducible); they're always interacting

what is the 1/3 psychologically primitive ingredients that are always in play?

system representing physical states, experienced to degree of pleasant or unpleasant arousal

what is the 2/3 psychologically primitive ingredients that are always in play?

human system representing emotion, evident through memory; more limited in ape forms

what is the 3/3 psychologically primitive ingredients that are always in play?

controlled attention to what mental event is conceptually activated or suppressed

what is the key distinguishing feature of the conceptual act model?

concepts of emotions are varied; not rigid, are flexible, and their ingredient combination can be reconfigured

what is another key aspect of the conceptual act model?

controlled attn of individuals to different concepts accounts for emotional variability



cognitive module

fast, domain-specific processes evolved to handle specific info

what're people with more attentional control better able to do?

incorporate new info into existing categories, broadening concept of emotion; use emotional intelligence to better direct behaviour

what is the second hypothesis of the conceptual act model?

psychological primitives can make any number of different recipes

what is the third hypothesis of the conceptual act model?

psychological primitives are not emotion-specific; can be used in the construction of a variety of moments, not restricted

pathology of the distributed circuitry for core affect

coordinates sensory processing in cortical mantle via bottom-up/top-down routes, projecting directly/indirectly to sensory cortices

final hypothesis of the conceptual act model

language is central to constructing emotional instances

what does the final hypothesis suggest about the importance of words?

words provide top-down context in emotion. emotions/faces can be interpreted according to the language context given

what may cause cultural differences in feeling?

cultural differences in emotional language may = cultural differences in feeling/emotional concepts.

what does the final hypothesis suggest about emotional language as a skill?

training/expanding emotional language can help build emotional intelligence/experience