• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/21

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

21 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

What are the 3 types of claims?


And what types of validities do they each require?

Frequency (construct & external validity)


Association (construct, external, and statistical)


Causal (construct, external, statistical, & internal)

Define "frequency claims"

describes the rate/amount of a single variable


e.g. 44% of Americans struggle to stay happy


or 1 in 25 teens attempts suicide

Define "association claims"

describes the relationship between 2 variables


e.g. shy people are better at reading facial expressions


or people who multitask most are worst at it

Define "causal claims"

describes how one variable causes change in another


e.g. romantic music can get you a date


or plate size/color influence how much you eat

What are the 4 types of validities?

Construct


External


Statistical


Insternal

Define "construct validity"

assessing operational definitions; how well the variables are measured or manipulated

Define "external validity"

assessing samples; how well results from the study will generalize to the population of interest and to different situations

Define "statistical validity" and the 2 types of errors related to it

assessing statistical significance and strength of affect; assessing the possibility of error


Type 1 error: false positive; claim an effect when there isn't one (reduce risk of Type 1 error by having a lower p-value)


Type 2 error: miss; claim no effect when there is one (increase power/sample size to decrease chance of a miss)

Define "internal validity"

assessing alternative explanations; how well the study controls for extraneous or confounding variables

What are the 3 elements causation requires?

Covariance: change in Variable A leads to systematic change in Variable B


Temporal precedence: Variable A must precede Variable B


Internal validity: alternative explanations must be eliminated; must control for participant and environmental variables

Explain the difference between a theory and a hypothesis

Theory: a general description of how variables are related


Hypothesis: specific predicted outcomes if a theory is correct

What is the difference between validity and reliability?

Define "parsimony"

Start simple and add complexity when needed

What is the "present/present bias"?

Bias that you don't see (we are biased by the things we don't see and biased by the things we do see)

define pop-up principle

Availability heuristic; things that pop up in your memory bias your thinking

Define confirmatory hypothesis testing

A specifically selected question that will lead to an expected answer

define "probablistic"

inferences are not expected to explain all cases all the time; exceptions in experiments are not conclusions

Define "falsifiable"

conditions that would fail to support the theory are explicitly stated

What are the different types of validities of measurement?

Face validity: does it look like a good measure? (ask experts)


Content validity: does it include all the important components of the construct?


Criterion validity: your measure is correlated with a relevant outcome; more objective


-correlational method: does a measure correlate with key outcomes & behaviors?


- known groups method: does the measure distinguish among groups whose behavior is well-known?


Convergent validity: your measure is more strongly associated with measures of similar constructs


Discriminant validity: your measure is less strongly associated with measures of dissimilar constructs

What is reliability?

When we measure, we measure consistently

What is validity?

We are measuring what we think we are measuring