• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
inductive reasoning
proceed from a carefully chosen number of cases; makes a generalization; use the reasoning process; make hypothesis; arguments by induction rely upon coherence
deductive reasoning
SYLLOGISMS; begins with a true statement (axiom)= major premise; added to the major premise is the minor premise. from these two comes the conclusion; "ergo" or "therefore"
All Onions are Vegetables
This Object is An Onion
Ergo, this object is a vegetable.
VALID syllogism
All cars have wheels
This vehicle has wheels
Ergo, this vehicle is a car.
INVALID. does not have proper syllogistic form
Deductive logic...
...guarantees the truth of the argument IF the premises are true
Inductive logic...
...does not guarantee the truth of the argument, but makes it REASONABLE for us to believe the conclusion
INCONSISTENT
conclusion of its different arguments CONTRADICT one another
REDUCTIO AD ABSURDAM
countering an argument by showing that if it is followed completely it will result in a PARADOX.
Arguments from AUTHORITY
may be more/less convincing to people, but often are not sufficeint in philosophy, because in philo, it is the nature of auth. which is in question
BEGGING THE QUESTION
repeating as a solution the very problem "my solution to poverty is to make sure that everyone has money"
tautology
statement [though true] is so obvious that it doesn't help clarify anything: "The only way we can have liberty is if we are free"
NON SEQUITIR
does not follow, "If you continue to drive to scool every day, you'll wind up in an accident"
POST HOC ERGO PROPTER HOC
"AFTER THAT, THEREFORE BECAUSE OF THAT"; "FOUR OF MY BROTHERS WENT TO COLLEGE, AND EACH OF THEM WOUND UP GETTING DIVORCED. IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A LONG&HAPPY MARRIAGE, DON'T MARRY A COLLEGE GRAD!"
CRITICISM
need not be seen negatively
AD HOMINEM
attack on the person; "poisons the well" of civilized discussion. F.e. "You're a communist!"