Fatima Whitmore
Introduction to Logic
Assignment 2
Dr. Kay
September 16, 2016
Assignment # 2
Reading Assignment: Read the first chapter from your e-book. Writing assignment: (essay writing): What is the distinction between Deductive and Inductive arguments?
Deductive arguments are one who’s premises or claim to provide conclusive grounds for the truth of its conclusion.
A deductive argument is the idea that the premise, gives assurance that the truth is the conclusion.
Every deductive argument is valid or invalid, it is impossible for its premises to be true without its conclusion being true also.
Otherwise it would be invalid, it has to have a basic principle, then gives detailed propositions.
In a deductive argument the premises are …show more content…
Inductive arguments are an argument in which it is thought that the premises provide reasons supporting the probable truth of the conclusion.
The premises are intended only to be strong that if they are true then it is unlikely that the conclusion is false on the other hand if the author of an argument does not think the truth provides good reason to believe the conclusion true the argument is definitely inductive.
Inductive arguments on the other hand can appeal to any consideration that might be the relevant to the probability of the truth of the conclusion.
The terms valid and invalid are not operative in an inductive argument some dictionaries Define induction is reasoning from the specific to the general.
Give some examples to make your explanation …show more content…
Brown likes to bake desserts.
Inductive argument science is built up with facts as a house is with stones but a collection of facts is no more a science than a house of stones is a house.
What is the difference between a premise and a conclusion?
Premise is an assumption that something is true.
In logic and argument requires a set of at least two declarative sentences (prepositions).
Conclusion- premises along with another declarative sentence or preposition it is the relationship between statements that holds true when one logically follows from one or more other a valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion follow from its premise and its conclusion or Consequences of its premises.
Provide an example of an argument from a newspaper or journal that highlights distinction.
A spokesperson for a new American Lung Association program called Lung Force, which is directed at women because recent 100 percent increase in lung cancer cases among women, for reasons we don’t understand yet. We want to educate woman about the new test coming out that can lead to early detection. AARP (2015, February/March). Upfront. The voice, 17.
This is deductive reasoning
AARP Magazine February through March 2015 paid 17 article number for upfront
Introduction to Logic
Assignment 2
Dr. Kay
September 16, 2016
Assignment # 2
Reading Assignment: Read the first chapter from your e-book. Writing assignment: (essay writing): What is the distinction between Deductive and Inductive arguments?
Deductive arguments are one who’s premises or claim to provide conclusive grounds for the truth of its conclusion.
A deductive argument is the idea that the premise, gives assurance that the truth is the conclusion.
Every deductive argument is valid or invalid, it is impossible for its premises to be true without its conclusion being true also.
Otherwise it would be invalid, it has to have a basic principle, then gives detailed propositions.
In a deductive argument the premises are …show more content…
Inductive arguments are an argument in which it is thought that the premises provide reasons supporting the probable truth of the conclusion.
The premises are intended only to be strong that if they are true then it is unlikely that the conclusion is false on the other hand if the author of an argument does not think the truth provides good reason to believe the conclusion true the argument is definitely inductive.
Inductive arguments on the other hand can appeal to any consideration that might be the relevant to the probability of the truth of the conclusion.
The terms valid and invalid are not operative in an inductive argument some dictionaries Define induction is reasoning from the specific to the general.
Give some examples to make your explanation …show more content…
Brown likes to bake desserts.
Inductive argument science is built up with facts as a house is with stones but a collection of facts is no more a science than a house of stones is a house.
What is the difference between a premise and a conclusion?
Premise is an assumption that something is true.
In logic and argument requires a set of at least two declarative sentences (prepositions).
Conclusion- premises along with another declarative sentence or preposition it is the relationship between statements that holds true when one logically follows from one or more other a valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion follow from its premise and its conclusion or Consequences of its premises.
Provide an example of an argument from a newspaper or journal that highlights distinction.
A spokesperson for a new American Lung Association program called Lung Force, which is directed at women because recent 100 percent increase in lung cancer cases among women, for reasons we don’t understand yet. We want to educate woman about the new test coming out that can lead to early detection. AARP (2015, February/March). Upfront. The voice, 17.
This is deductive reasoning
AARP Magazine February through March 2015 paid 17 article number for upfront