Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
33 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
Job analysis
|
obtain info re tasks & requirements
-interviews, obs, work diairies |
|
|
performance eval
|
in organs
- det if bonus, raise, promo |
|
|
objectiven vs subj measures
|
categorization of ljob performance (criterion) measures.
-ob= sales, $ -sub= judgement, susceptible to rater bias. |
|
|
paired comparisoms
|
performance appraisal
-compare to other empe |
|
|
critical incidents
|
statements re specific work beh'rs
-very good &/0r bad |
|
|
behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)
|
ragter chooses critical incident for ea job dimension that describes empe
|
|
|
rater bias
|
error of subj measures of job performance
-halo effect, central tendency, strictness & leniency bias cure= rater training |
|
|
cognitive ability tests
|
mst accurate of job performance
|
|
|
work samples
|
predictor of prospective empe
-tasks sim to job -also trainablilty tests on job previews |
|
|
realistic perview
|
accurate, unbiaed job desc & org given to prospective empe
-reduce turnover, lo disapp't & disillus't |
|
|
interviews
|
selective tech
-lo reliability & validity -improved if structured W/ ++ interviewers |
|
|
assessment ctrs
|
eval empe re promo
-multidimensional -work sims, written tests, interviews |
|
|
criterion contamination
|
rater's knowledge of empe's performnce = biases.
- causes artificially high correlation btwn predictor & criterion |
|
|
personality tests
|
Selection tests
-better when specific measure not global traits |
|
|
interests tests
|
selection tool
-not good to pred performance -good pred job choice,sat, persistence |
|
|
adverse impact
|
Determine when a selection process might be discriminatory
-minortity is < 80% than occurs -4/5 rule of employment |
|
|
differential validity
|
predictors validity coefficient sig dif btwn subgrps
-eg lo'r for women/men -rare, usually due to methodological probs |
|
|
unfairness
|
job selection when minorities consistently score lo'r on predictor but can do job as well.
-cause of adverse impact |
|
|
incremental validity
|
++ in decision making accuracy fr a particular predictor
|
|
|
combining predictors
|
- multiple predictors give > comprehensive info
-multiple regression, multiple cutoff, multiple hurdles |
|
|
multi-collinearity
|
term used to describe predictors when highly correlated
|
|
|
Mutli-regression
|
est applicants score on criterion based on scores fr other preds.
-compensatory (ie lo score on one can be made up on oth) |
|
|
multi-cutoff
|
must score above a min cutoff on ea predictor to be hired.
-noncompensatory |
|
|
multi-hurdle
|
must meet min level of performance on mult preds.
-pred given 1 @ time w/ ea new given only if successful -noncompensatory |
|
|
needs analysis
|
det if & what kind of training is necess by id'g job perf & empe deficits
-1st step in dev't of training prog -aka needs assessment |
|
|
vestibule training
|
combo on & off job training
-physical replica or sim -classroom, programmed instr |
|
|
prgram eval
|
eval peformance to det raise, bonus or promo
|
|
|
apititude tests
|
measure of potential for learning/performance
|
|
|
achievement tests
|
measure of how well has mastered material
|
|
|
Holland's personality typology
|
theory of career choice
- 6 types realistic (tools,mach), investigative (analytical), artistic (expressive), social (work w/ oths), enterprising (manip oths, $, goals), conventional (records, filing, bookkeeping) |
|
|
congruence
|
fit btwn personality type and occupation
|
Holland
|
|
Super's careet dev't theory
|
career choice
-career maturity has predictable stages -related to self-concept |
|
|
Teideman & O;Hara decision making model
|
based on Erikson theory of ego.
career-related correlates to 8 psychosocial crisis resolution -differentiation = realization occupation not fitting -personal and common reality |
|