• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Federal Court System

Article III, Section 2 limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to:




Law-Based Federal Jurisdiction:



  • Constitution and Federal Laws
  • Admiralty and Maritime Laws



Party-Based Federal Jurisdiction:



  • U.S. Government
  • State vs. State
  • State vs. Other State Citizens
  • Individuals from Different States (more than $75,000 in controversy)
  • Diplomats

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - 11th Amendment

States that private individuals can't sue states for money damages, based on state sovereign immunity.




Exceptions to the 11th Amendment:



  • Other states and the federal government
  • Cities and counties
  • Injunctive Relief
  • Waiver of Sovereign Immunity
  • Enforcement Powers

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - Case or Controversy

Article III, Section 2 limits the jurisdiction of federal courts to cases and controversies.




Mnemonic: RAMPS

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS

RAMPS =



  • Ripeness
  • Abstention
  • Mootness
  • Political Questions
  • Standing

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS - Ripeness

"You sued too soon". It is necessary for a party to have an injury!




Advisory opinions are impermissible.

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS - Abstention

Means to "provide deference to state courts"





  • The federal court may abstain if the meaning of a state law or regulation is unclear.
  • Where a state court proceeding is going on, the federal court will abstain from hearing the same matter.



Adequate and Independent State Grounds:



  • The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear a cause from a state's highest court if that state's high court's decision can rest on state law grounds.
  • Exception - the state follows the federal law.

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS - Mootness

"You sued too late". The dispute is over.



  • Again, advisory opinions are impermissible.
  • Exception to mootness = if the issues are capable of repetition yet evading review (examples: pregnancy/abortion).

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS - Political Questions

Federal courts cannot hear cases involving political questions.



  • Political question = a matter assigned to another branch by the constitution or incapable of a judicial answer.



Two primary factors in determining if there is a political question:



  • Textual commitment - something in the words of the Constitution that allocates the issue to another branch.
  • No standards (political rather than legal questions)



Examples of political questions:



  • Gerrymandering
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Impeachment = textual commitment

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS - Standing

Article III requires a person litigating a constitutional question to show:




  • Injury in Fact - actual or imminent personal injury
  • Causation - defendant caused plaintiff's injury.
  • Redressability - victory helps plaintiff.



Examples of individuals who lack standing:


  • Legislators
  • Constitution Lovers
  • Taxpayers



Exception - Establishment Clause Laws



Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - Other Limitations on Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts - RAMPS - Standing Cont.

Specialized Problems of Standing - Third Parties:



  • Generally no standing for third party.
  • Exception - where there is a special relationship between the parties AND the party who has standing is incapacitated.



An organization has standing to assert the claims of its members if:



  • Member has standing
  • Purpose of the association is relevant (note: if the purpose is to "promote the constitution", then this is a wrong answer)
  • Member participation in the litigation is unnecessary.

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - The United States Supreme Court - Jurisdiction

Article III, Section 2 provides the Supreme Court with original jurisdiction in:



  • Party based disputes.


Parties include:


  • Foreign diplomats
  • States
These party disputes are immediately allowed to go to the Supreme Court.



Appellate Jurisdiction - exists where the federal constitution or a federal law are at issue.

Judicial Review - Organizations of the Courts in the Federal System - The United States Supreme Court - Congress' Power Over the Courts

With Lower Federal Courts:



  • Congress has full power



With the Supreme Court:



  • This area of case law is unsettled



Congress cannot however:



  • Take a case from appellate jurisdiction and make it original jurisdiction.