Marbury V. Madison In 1803: The Power Of Judicial Review

Decent Essays
Judicial Review is the power of the Supreme Court to review the actions taken by Congress and the President. After reviewing their actions it’s the Supreme Court’s responsibility to decide if their actions are legal under the Constitution. The court can nullify an action if it is viewed as unconstitutional. Judicial Review is an essential part of balancing the power within the government to ensure that one branch doesn’t have too much power. The Supreme Court didn’t have the power of judicial review under the initial Constitution that was created in 1787. The ability of judicial review was acquired through the case, Marbury v. Madison in 1803. The case was a product of a petition to the Supreme Court by William Marbury which forced the Secretary

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Answers

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. In revolutionary America, five groups of people, which was the New England merchant, the southern planters, the royalists, labors, and small farmer were important because they led independent from Great Britain because of conflict with taxation, trade, and commerce. 2. Samuel Adams and some people who disguised as “Mohawk” led Boston Tea Party because colonial merchants feared that the monopoly would hurt their business.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ population had multiplied for many years; and as more people migrated to the U.S., the power that was derived from the citizens influenced the inflation of the government. Marbury v. Madison first paved the way to allow the judicial branch to have a true influence on this government. The events that lead to the hearing and how the case preceded directly affected how the verdict would influence the judicial branch’s powers. Once Thomas Jefferson,…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a result of the lame duck period, when the power shifted from the federalists when John Adams was president to Thomas Jefferson, a democratic republican. The night before Jefferson went into presidency, Adams appoints a whole load of new judges so federalists could still have some power. William Marbury was supposed to be one of these judges but was not appointed to be one in time because Jefferson became president. Marbury then asked the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to secretary of state, James Madison but Jefferson decided to withdraw all the new commissions and ordered Madison deny them. This called for John Marshall to rule on this argument.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Marshall wrote the unanimous decision that stated Marbury had the right to sue. The Judiciary act of 1789 was considered unconstitutional4. The Supreme Court cannot mandate something happen. The Writ of Mandamus expanded the power that the court has under the constitution. The judiciary act of 1789 directly conflicted with the U.S Constitution.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison, the Marshall Court settled that the idea judicial review is the only the judicial branch that can review whether laws and actions were approved. The Marshall Court declared the power of the Supreme Court that has the capacity to understand the Constitution and could use it to determine the legality of the other two branches actions. The Marshall Court modified how the Supreme Court was seen. In doing so the Marshall Court had an intense result on the American government.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an elegant act of “judicial jujitsu,” the Supreme Court issued its decision in Marbury v. Madison on February 24, 1803, establishing the high court’s power of judicial review. The dramatic tale begins with the presidential election of 1800, in which President John Adams, a Federalist, lost reelection to Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Congress also changed hands, with the Democratic-Republicans achieving majorities in both chambers. Adams could see the writing on the wall: his party had been relegated to the judicial branch.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What we call judicial review today came about in the case Marbury v. Madison (1803), when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall assumed that power from the legislator. Marbury v Madison made it clear that the Supreme Court had claimed Judicial Supremacy in deciding unconstitutionality. In the book, Taking Away the Constitution From the Courts, author Mark Tushnet argues, “Doing away with judicial review would have one clear effect: It would return all constitutional decision-making to the people acting politically. It would make populist constitutional law the only constitutional law there is” (154).…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial Branch is in charge of interpreting laws and the Constitution, this helps keep checks & balances, it stop Congress from passing bad laws, or just any law that they want to. Alexander Hamilton put it this way, the legislative branch writes the rules that we abide by, while the executive branch “holds the sword of the community” by enforcing the laws (Doc. B). All the judicial branch does is judge whether laws are constitutional, to avoid having a law that violates the Constitution, so it doesn’t pose any harm to the government. It helps keep balance between all the branches and to keep everything…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is called judicial review. If a law violates the terms of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the right to invalidate that law. Because of the judicial review the Supreme Court plays an important role in the well-functioning of the law system. It prevents the different sectors of government to abuse their power.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federal courts have the power of judicial review. After the Marbury v. Madison issue, people who supported states rights argued that the states rightly had that power according the Constitution. It wasn’t until the Civil War that the supremacy of the Federal government…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is one of the ways that the Judicial Branch checks the other branches. For instance if the congress and the president pass a law but it is believed to be unconstitutional it is sent to the Supreme Court for review where the Justices (9) will analyze the law and use interpretation of previous laws primarily the Constitution the Law of the land so to speak to decide whether the law is truly lawful under the United States…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the Judicial branch then evaluates the laws, and check if they are constitutional or unconstitutional. This process is called Checks and Balances, “The system of separate institutions sharing some powers… its purpose is to keep power divided among the three branches” (Turner,27). By this definition not one power is meant to be all powerful, although…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays