Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
69 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Why did we have growth in Leadership |
1) started studying it more, recognized the importance of it 2) Shift in the type of work we do; less hands on more with our brains 3) Work environment is more complex |
|
Leadership Definition |
Leadership is a processwhereby an individual influences a group ofindividuals to achieve a common goal. |
|
4 components of leadership |
process, influence, group, goal |
|
Evolution of leadership in history |
went from domination to influential |
|
Assigned Leadership |
•Basedon occupying a position within an organization. Examples include Teamleaders, plant managers, department heads, directors. |
|
Emergent Leader |
•Acquiredthrough other people supporting and accepting the individual’s behavior. An InformalLeader. Beingverbally involved and informed, seeking others’ opinions, initiating new ideas,being firm but not rigid |
|
Leadership vs Management SIMILARITIES |
Both involve influence, working with people, goal attainment |
|
Management |
Seeking order and Stability. Plan, Lead, Organize, Control. |
|
Leadership |
seeking adaptive and constructive change. Establish Direction, set strategies, align people, motivating, inspiring |
|
Only management problems |
Strong management with no leadership leads to stagnant, inflexible organizations. Stagnant, you fail to adjust (blockbuster) |
|
Only leadership problems |
Strong leadership with no managementleads to meaningless changeand chaos inorganizations. Chaos you need direction (Catullo's) |
|
What is Power? |
Power is given, power is influence, it is perception, you can have it and not know you do, you may not use it |
|
3 Reactions to Influence (power) |
Resist, comply, commit |
|
Resistance |
opposing a behavior |
|
Comply |
motivated by an external source (reward), or a lack of punishment. |
|
Committment |
identify with and highly motivated. You want to do it! |
|
5 types of power |
Referent, expert, coercive, legitimate, reward |
|
Referent |
admiration, idolizing, personal relationship. Celebrity |
|
Expert |
power by knowledge |
|
Legitamate |
Power by status or formal job |
|
Coercive |
power with force |
|
Reward |
Control to give reward or avoid something negative |
|
Postition power |
power a person derives from a particularoffice or rank in a formal organizational system. |
|
Personal Power |
influence power a person has by beingseen by others as likeable and knowledgeable. |
|
Position Power Segments |
Coercive, Legitimate, reward |
|
Personal Power Segments |
Referent, Expert |
|
Dependence |
Created by the importance, scarcity, and nonsubistitutability of a resource. |
|
5 Influencing Tactics |
Ingratiation, rational persuasion, inspirational appeal, personal appeal, legitimization |
|
Ingratiation |
Being friendlyand giving praiseto get the person in a good mood before making a request |
|
Rational Persuasions |
Includes logical arguments withfactual evidence |
|
inspirational appeal |
Attempts to arouse follower enthusiasmthrough internalization |
|
personal appeal |
Request the person to meet an objectivebased on loyaltyand friendship |
|
Legitimization |
Relying on organizational authority |
|
Leadership Traits |
intelligence, self confidence, determination, integrity, sociability |
|
Intelligence |
Should not vary from subordinates, having strongverbal ability, perceptualability,and reasoning. |
|
Self Confidence |
The ability to be certainabout one’s competencies and skills. Includes a sense of self-esteemandself-assuranceaswell as the belief that one can makea difference. |
|
Determination |
The desire to get the job done,including initiative,persistence,dominance,and drive. Willing to assert themselves, are proactive,and have the capacity to perseverein the face of obstacles.Important when followers NEEDdirection |
|
Integrity |
"I trust this person" The quality of honestyand trustworthiness.Adhere to a strong set of principlesand take responsibility forone’s own actions.Inspireconfidence inothers. |
|
Sociability |
Inclination to seek outpleasant social relationships. Have good interpersonal skillsand create cooperative relationships withothers. Sensitivetowardsothers and show concern for their well-being. |
|
Big 5 Personality traits |
Extroversion, conscientiousness, Openness, low neuroticism, Agreeableness (order from most to least important) |
|
Extraversion |
Social, assertive, positive
|
|
conscientious |
dependable, organized, decisve |
|
openness |
creative, insightful, curious |
|
Neuroticism |
insecure, depressed, hostile |
|
Agreeableness |
accepting, conforming, trusting |
|
Emotional Intelligence |
The ability to noticeand manageemotional cues. Interplay between emotionsand thinking. |
|
Big 4 of EQ |
Self awareness, Self management, Empathy, Manage |
|
Self awareness |
aware of your ownemotions |
|
Self Management |
can you take control of your emotions and put on a good face |
|
Empathy |
awareness of others emotions, ability to recognize them |
|
Manage |
can you manage their emotions, can you act in a way that is effective in changing someone’s emotions |
|
Trait Approach |
Focuses EXCLUSIVELY on the leader. Assumes that having a leader with acertain set of traits is crucial to effective leadership.Selectingthe right people will increase organizational effectiveness. Usedfor personal awareness. |
|
Strengths of trait approach |
1.Intuitively appealing 2.Has a century of research to backit up 3.Focuses only on leader4.Given us benchmarks |
|
Criticisms of trait approach |
1.Failure to achieve a definitivelist2.Failure to take situations intoaccount3.Highly subjective 4.Only linked to leader emergence,not linked to leader effectiveness 5.Not useful for training anddeveloping |
|
Skills approach |
focus on skillsandabilities that can be learned |
|
Similarities and differences between Skills and trait approach |
Sim: leader focus, Dif: skills rather than inatetraits |
|
Strength of Skills Approach |
1.Leader-focused –Skill set of them2.Intuitively appealing3.Provides expansive view ofleadership4.Provides structure |
|
Criticisms of Skills Approach |
1.Mayextend past the boundaries of leadership2.Weak in predictive value3.Claims not to be trait model, butis trait-like4.Maynot be suitably appropriate for all contexts |
|
Three-Skill Approach (Katz,1955) |
TechnicalSkills (analytics), HumanSkills, ConceptualSkills |
|
Technical Skills |
analytical skills, knowledge of specific job |
|
Human Skills |
people skills, be aware of own perspective and perspective of others, creating trust |
|
Conceptual Skills |
ability to work with ideas and concepts, very abstract |
|
Skills Model (Mumfordet al., 2000) |
individual attributes, competencies, leadership outcomes |
|
Individual Attributes |
general cognitive ability (how our genetically created brain funcations), crystallized cognitive ability (the things we have learned that won't go away), motivation (willingness to get it done), personality |
|
Competencies |
Problem solving, social judgement, knowledge |
|
Problem Solving |
1.Defining problems(in real world you have to figure it out. University GIVES you the problems)2.Gatherinformation (you’re not given a book)3.Formulatinga new understanding (what possible solutions, refraining?)4.Basedon new understanding generation solutions, plans on implementing solutions |
|
Social Judgment |
1.Perspectivetaking, understanding others’ views 2.Socialperceptiveness3.Beingable to adaptCommunicating |
|
Knowledge
|
information you need to understand to dothe stuff you’re doing |
|
Leadership outcomes |
problem solving and performance |