• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Natural Law

Natural law the same in all times and places - Aristotle


In right agreement with Nature


Cicero


No law unless it is just


Acquinas

Positivism

Danger in natural law as morals are derived from passions no reasons - Hume




Utilitarianism - Bentham




Law should just been seen as a system of rules enforced by a sovereign not what law ought to be - Austin

locke

Authority from consent of the people

Hume

formalism/conceptualism


downplays moral values, makes it seem like decisions are based in fact and then finds laws/precedent to fit.




Rules not from morals, we are too passionate. He seesnatural law as dangerous as it does not stem from reason but from passions.

jus gentium


is that law which natural reason establishes for all

Formalism/conceptualism

underplays the discretion that judges have in making decisions. It places an emphasis on the real meanings of words and precedent. (Hart)

acquinas

Aquinas recognizes four main kinds of law:


the eternal, (of universe)


the divine. (word of god)


natural, (as applied by us)


the human, (created to understand the eternal)


The last three all depend on the first, but in different ways.

Rawls

Liberty and difference principles. Gives priority to the worst off and extends basic liberties to all

Hart

positivist


primary and secondary rules. Primary laws can happen without structures, secondary rules include recognition




need for certainty


precedent can be difficult


common experience leads to empirical moral laws

dworkin

Positivist


Judicial activism -


The legal material itself has the moralprinciples Riggs v Palmer


Judges are engaged in an interpretive exercisewhere they attempt to find the best legal answer.


Judges use a rights based approach with a focuson individual rights when interpreting law

principles v policies

Critical Legal Studies

Altman


Hippy ex-marxists think that laws are completely incoherent and mirrors the variety of philosophies in society

Wadron

- no less democratic for not having a constitution, actually makes it better for rights




- thinks something is lost if judicial activism gets to make laws and citizens aren't involved



Moral realism

the view that there exist such things as moral facts and moral values,and that these are objective andindependent of our perception ofthem or our beliefs, feelings or other attitudes towards them


Dworkin policy v principles

Principlefor him is a requirement for fairness or morals, whereas a policy states aprinciple

Riggs v Palmer policy not principle