Hps 3850 Final Exam

Front 1

Precede Model
Social Assessment

Back 1

Define the quality of life of those in the PP

Front 2

Precede Model
Epidemiological Assessment

Back 2

In which the planners use data to identify and take the health goals or problems that may contribute to or interact with problems identified in phase 1

Front 3

Precede Model
Education and ecological assessments

Back 3

identifies factors that can influence a given behavior into categories

Front 4

predisposing factors

Back 4

knowledge and many affective traits such as a persons attitude, values, beliefs and perceptions

Front 5

Enabling factors

Back 5

Factors that allow a person to do the intended health change

Front 6

Reinforcing factors

Back 6

factors that encourage the person to continue with the health program (rewards, praise, attention)

Front 7

Precede Models
Administrative and policy assessment alignment

Back 7

ability to make and match appropriate strategies and interventions with earlier phases of model

Front 8

Validity

Back 8

whether it correctly measures the concepts under investigation

Front 9

Face validity

Back 9

if on face the measures appears to measure what it is supposed

Front 10

Content validity

Back 10

does the test actually measure what it is supposed to measure

Front 11

Reliability

Back 11

does the instrument produce same result time and time again

Front 12

Rater Reliability

Back 12

consistency between individuals

Front 13

Sensitivity

Back 13

is the ability of the test to identify correctly those with a disease or condition

Front 14

Specificity

Back 14

is the ability of the test to identify correctly those who do not have a disease or condition

Front 15

Type I Error

Back 15

The possibility that the null hypothesis can be rejected with it is in fact true

Front 16

Type II Error

Back 16

possiblilty of failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, not true

Front 17

Internal personal resources

Back 17

supply the labor, technicians, data analysis, trainers

Front 18

External personal resources

Back 18

vendors, hospitals, clinics

Front 19

In-House materials

Back 19

things that you develop such as questionnaites, protocols

Front 20

External materials

Back 20

canned materials that are already developed for the program

Front 21

soft money

Back 21

given for a specific time and will expire or be taken away at some point

Front 22

hard money

Back 22

on going and provided from year to year

Front 23

speed money

Back 23

start up money

Front 24

in-kind support

Back 24

providing free materials for local programs

Front 25

Diffusion Theory

Back 25

theory for the diffusion in populations, describes a pattern for the adaptations of the innovations

Front 26

innovators

Back 26

become involved in the program just because they heard about it and wanted to be first

Front 27

Laggards

Back 27

not very interested in innovations and would be the last to become involved in new health promotion programs if at all

Front 28

Intervention
Health Communications

Back 28

are designed to inform and influence individual and community decision to enhance health

Front 29

Intervention
Health Education

Back 29

Any planned combination of learning experience designed to predispose, enable, and reinforce voluntary behavior decisions conductive to health in individuals, groups or communities

Front 30

Intervention
Health Policy

Back 30

Most effective ways to change human or population behavior

Front 31

Intervention
Health Engineering

Back 31

Designed to change the structure or type of services/systems designed to improve health promotion

Front 32

Intervention
Community Mobilization

Back 32

involving helping communities identify and take action on shared concerns using participatory decision making

Front 33

Health Education

Back 33

process of education people about health

Front 34

Health Promotion

Back 34

any planned combinations of educational, political, enviormentla, regulatory, or organizational mechanisms that support actions and condition of living conductive to the health of individuals, groups, communities

Front 35

Qualitative Measures

Back 35

measures that produce data in the 'language of the participants' Ex. open ended questions

Front 36

Quantitative Measures

Back 36

use of predetermine questions and establish response items

Front 37

Nominal Data

Back 37

put data into non rakned order categories (gender, true, false)

Front 38

Ordinal Data

Back 38

put into ranked ordered categories (not at all satsfied ........ very statsfied)

Front 39

Interval Data

Back 39

put data into categories (temperature and ages)

Front 40

Ratio Measures

Back 40

Done with a scale and an absolute zero (inces, scores on a test)

Front 41

Experimental Design

Back 41

in which participants are randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups

Front 42

Quasi-experimental

Back 42

same as experimental design but no randomization, does have experimental and control groups

Front 43

Non experimental design

Back 43

can be used, but the results are limited in significance, because of changes to the program

Front 44

Process Objectives

Back 44

are the daily task, activities, and work plan that lead to the accomplishment of all other levels of objectives

Front 45

Learning Objectives

Back 45

educational or learning tool needed in order to achieve desired behavior changes

Front 46

Action or Behavioral Objectives

Back 46

actions a PP can be involved in that will help you reach your program goal

Front 47

Environmental Objective

Back 47

outline the non behavioral causes of a health problem that are

Front 48

Outcome or program objective

Back 48

the ultimate outcome of a program aimed at what, when and how much

Front 49

Process Evaluation

Back 49

combination of measurements obtained during the program to control, assure, and improve the quality of performance or delivery

Front 50

Impact evaluation

Back 50

immediate observable effects of a program after completion or program (measures awareness, knowledge, attitudes, skill and behaviors)

Front 51

Outcome evaluation

Back 51

the goal or product of the program leading to the goal of the program and is measured in morbidity/mortality data

Front 52

Formative Evaluation

Back 52

combination of measures/judgements before or during the implementation to improve the quality of delivery

Front 53

Summative Evaluation

Back 53

combination of measures done after a program that permit conclusions to be drawn about impact, outcome, or benefits of a program or method

Front 54

Cross Sectional Study

Back 54

either the entire population or a subset of population is selected

Front 55

Longitudinal Study

Back 55

repeated studies/ observations of the same items (variables) over a long period of time, often many decades

Front 56

Prospective Studies

Back 56

Subjects are identified based on health risks prior to the development of the disease or condition of interest, and the outcome is measured over time

Front 57

Retrospective Study

Back 57

The outcome has already occurred at the time of the study, allows the researches to investigate associations