• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/46

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

46 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Smil
EFFICIENCY
no fixed carrying capacity
Foster and Magdoff
agriculture improvement caused decline in soil fertility
problem was social
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
ecosystem services, direct and indirect drivers
Constanza et al.
ecosystem services
4 kinds of capital
must propertize resources without privatizing them
Liu et al.
household size decreasing, especially in hotspot countries
Leichenko and Solecki
migration is driving globalization
suburbanization new phenomenon
Lambin et al.
fossil fuel combustion and deforestation are top human sources of GHGs
erosion leads to negative feedback loop of soil and crops
Righelato and Spracklen
deforestation -> climate change
Pyne
Fire helped everything coevolve
Malthus
2 postulata
problem because assumed fixed productivity
Godwin
predicted maximum possible world population at 9 billion people
Smith
division of labor
money's value can change
Marx
variable vs constant capital
working population produces capital
Gomez-Baggethun et al.
economists say nature = use/exchange values
commodifying nature isn’t the same as being ideologically neutral
Engels
hates Malthus
but theory was necessary stepping stone in population thinking
Livi-Bacci
demographic transition
beyond threshold, resource availability has no influence on survival
pop growth and economy both independent and dependent variables
Pollan
agrobusiness economically irrational and politically rational
farmers lose more the more they produce
Prince
draining of wetlands, increases yield and productivity
Berry
problem with specialization and division of labor
modern technology destroys land
crisis of culture
people should live where they work
Bobrow-Strain
bread fear
ethical eating
market-based consumption choice
Stuart
buyers forced nonsensical standards on growers
concentrated systems are riskiest
DeLind and Howard
processors make demands on growers
regulations help large corps
small farmers can't afford changes
Connelly
population change is international issue
fear of pop "quality"
double standard (decreasing 3rd world, increasing 1st)
frame as humanitarian effort
Sauvy
"world pop" doesn't make sense
Erlich
entire planet is overpopulated
Patel
hunger vs obesity
supermarket abundance is misleading
farmers have few options of what/where to grow
bad food cheaper than good food
Poppendieck
token solutions for hunger problem
food programs make well-fed feel better
problem is inequality, hunger is symptom
obesity increases as poverty increases
Davis
drought events are global
distribution, not scarcity, is issue in famines
new imperialism
Worster
dust bowls caused human ignorance and negligence towards the nature
man seen as having right to use land
Kloppenburg
commodified seed by genetic engineering and patenting
problems (interdependence of crops, decreased diversity, inequalities)
germplasm
Busch
importance of ag science!
social change accompanies technological change
knowledge is a commodity
Boyd and Watts
meat production, broilers, efficiency, breeds of livestock becoming identical
Rifkin
Gouveia
industrialization of meat industry
confined integration system
vertical integration
Friedmann
wheat (encouraged industrialization), durable food, livestock complexes
Van der Ploeg
industrialization of farming caused current agrarian crisis
industrialized farms become dependent on credit and actually produce a negative cash flow
smaller farms making a comeback
Livi-Bacci (2)
poor growing 8x faster than rich
dem transition of poor in 1950
increasing life expectancy getting harder, tech reduces mortality
in future: inequality, stricter migration policies, life expectancies increase
Tilman 1998
Green Revolution
positives: meet food demands
negatives: contamination, GHGs, loss of diversity, eutrophication
dependence on pesticides, broken recycling of nutrients
Evenson and Gollin
MV development = green rev
IARCs, NARS, SPIA
reduced food prices -> gains in life expectancy
but concerns about sustainability
Naylor et al.
industrial livestock sector now separate from local land boundaries
livestock prod is largest user of land
feed crops grown separate = inefficient
Keller and Brummer
metaphysics of industrial ag
don't use fertilizers, goal is efficiency
biological diversity benefits
Tilman et al. 2009
biofuels done right options
can't compete with food prod
McMichael 2009
agrofuels
good for capital = bad for env
can't know that biofuels actually decrease GHGs
McMichael et al. 2007
Increase in incomes = increases meat prod
a decrease in meat consumption is good for health and climate. Meat production is intensive compared to grain
Mariola
local-industrial complex
need to focus on fossil fuels
Sen
With greater opportunities for education (especially female education), reduction of mortality rates (especially of children), improvement in economic security (especially in old age), and greater participation of women in employment and in political action, fast reductions
in birth rates can be expected to result
inequality, americans impact >>> african's
Harvey
logical empiricism
overpopulation causes rich to repress poor, also is argument for repression