• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

Drawing a conclusion based on admitted


ignorance

Appeal to Ignorance

EXAMPLE:


"No one has ever proved that there is a God, so obviously God does not exist."

When an arguer attempts to support a conclusion by using a premise that claims that some questionable source says the conclusion is true.

Appeal to Inappropriate Authority

Sources may be questionable if they are known to be, or suspected of, lacking expertise in the area.

A causes B simply because A and B are associated with one another.

False Cause (cum hoc ergo propter hoc)

EXAMPLE:
"Every time I have a bad day, it rains. Therefore, me having a bad day must cause it to rain."

When a conclusion is asserted on the basis solely that B follows A, so A must cause B.

False Cause (post hoc ergo propter hoc)

EXAMPLE:
"Look at what happened as soon as Obama became president: our nation is in greater financial ruin than it has been since the Great Depression."

Assertion that A causes B when in reality there are many causes besides A.

False Cause (causal oversimplification)

EXAMPLE:
"Ralph Nader is the sole reason that Bush became president."

Confusing "A causes B" when in reality, "B causes A".

False Cause (confusion of cause and effect)

EXAMPLE:
"CSU decided to build a new parking lot for students. Sure enough, as soon as they did it caused more students to start driving to campus."

When a proposed causal sequence is unlikely to be true and this false sequence is used to justify a conclusion.

Slippery Slope

When the arguer draws a conclusion that creates a general rule based on too few specific cases or exceptional cases.

Hasty Generalization/Composition

Also may occur by inappropriately attributing a characteristic of the parts of something to the whole.

Inappropriately distributing a characteristic of some whole thing to parts of that thing.

Division

EXAMPLE:
"The United States is the most powerful nation on earth, so each American must be extremely powerful."

Basing a conclusion solely on established practice.

Appeal to Tradition

EXAMPLE:


"College freshmen have always been subject to hazing, so there obviously can't be anything wrong with it."

Basing a conclusion on the rejection of two options when there are plenty of other options.

False Dichotomy

EXAMPLE:


"Mom, either you let me go to the NSYNC concert or I will die!"