• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/21

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

21 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

appeal to force

arguer threatens the reader/listener

appeal to pity

arguer elicits pity from the reader/listener

appeal to the people

arguer incites a mob mentality or appeals to our desire for security, love, or respect

accident

a general rule is applied to a specific case it was not intended to cover

straw man

arguer distorts an opponent's argument and then attacks the distorted argument



*there must be two arguers

missing the point

arguer draws a conclusion different from the one supported by the premises

red herring

arguer leads the reader/listener off the track

appeal to unqualified authority

arguer cites an untrustworthy authority

appeal to ignorance

premises report that nothing is known or proved about some subject, and then a conclusion is drawn about that subject

hasty generalization

a general conclusion is drawn from an atypical sample

false cause

conclusion depends on a nonexistent or minor causal connection

slippery slope

conclusion depends on an unlikely chain reaction of causes

weak analogy

conclusion depends on a defective analogy(similarity)

begging the question

arguer creates the illusion that inadequate premises are adequate by leaving out a key premise, restating the conclusion as a premise, or reasing in a circle

complex question

multiple questions are concealed in a single question

false dichotomy

an "either... or..." premise hides additional alternatives

suppressed evidence

arguer ignores important evidence that requires a different conclusion

equivocation

conclusion depends on a shift in meaning of a word or phrase

amphiboly

conclusion depends on an incorrect interpretation of an ambiguous statement made by someone other than the arguer

composition

an attribute is incorrectly transferred from the parts to the whole

division

an attribute is incorrectly transferred from the whole to the parts