• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Why do psychologists violate ethics principles?
-Might be because principles are vaguely worded
-Might be the psychologist’s perception that violating the code will satisfy even higher moral values
When laws and values conflict
-57% of psychologists said that they intentionally broke a law or formal ethical principle for the client’s welfare or other deeper value
*9% of these instances involved engaging in sex with a client
-73% said they would do it again if the circumstances were the same
-77% believed that psychologists should sometimes violate standards
Common thinking errors in clinical judgment (Haferkamp, 2005)
-Confirmation bias
-Trait negativity bias
-Availability and representativeness heuristics
-Illusory correlation
-Fundamental attribution error
The role of emotion in moral judgment (Greene, et al., 2001)
-fMRI results found differential brain activity when comparing moral-personal and moral-impersonal dilemmas
-Also found significant differences in reaction time for moral-personal dilemmas
The Beliefs and Behaviors of Psychologists as Therapists (Pope, Tabachnick, & Keith-Spiegel, 1987)
Major findings
-Psychologists’ behavior was generally in accordance with their ethical beliefs
-Informal networks of colleagues were viewed as the most effective source of guidance
-Ethics code and Ethics committee were also highly valued resources
Ethical ambiguities in the practice of child psychology
Major findings:
-Generally, the younger the client, the greater the leniency when evaluating the propriety of the specified practice
-Individual uncertainty high in forensic practices
-Group variability high in clinical boundary issues and confidentiality
-Situational variability high in clinical boundary issues and professional relationship issues
Perspectives on culture and ethics (Knapp & VandeCreek, 2007)
-Ethical universalism
-Moral relativism
-Soft universalism
Perspectives on culture and ethics (Knapp & VandeCreek, 2007)
-Beliefs Vary Within the Same Culture
-Cultures Change Over Time
-Apparent Cultural Conflicts Are Often Similar to Ethical Conflicts With European-American Patients
Responding to conflicts in cultural beliefs (Knapp & VandeCreek, 2007)
-Clarify values through respectful dialogue
-Use principle-based ethics to balance conflicting moral obligations
Malpractice & Licensing Pitfalls for Therapists (Caudill)
-Excessive or inappropriate self-disclosure
-Business relationships with patients
-Using techniques without proper training
-Using incorrect diagnosis deliberately
-Avoiding the medical model
-The “true love” exception for sexual relationships
-Inadequate notes
Malpractice & Licensing Pitfalls for Therapists (Caudill) (cont...)
-Failure to obtain an adequate history
-Uncritically accepting what a patient says
-Use of inappropriate “syndromes”
-Out of office contact
-Failure to obtain peer consultation
Ethical decision making (Tymchuk et al., 1982) -Major Findings
Major findings:
-Vignettes about confidentiality issues, moral issues involving the male therapist-female client relationship, and standards for growth groups had strong consensus
-Vignettes about test scrutiny and interpretation, research activities, and fees had the weakest consensus
Ethical decision making (Tymchuk et al., 1982) -Conclusions
Conclusions:
-Ethical decision making is easier when professional/legal standards exist and when the issues are current and related to the therapist-client relationship
-Psychologists have more difficulty agreeing on treatment issues that may be closely intertwined with clinical orientation or on issues that are not in the forefront of the discipline
Ethical dilemmas in psychological practice (Haas, Malouf, & Mayerson, 1986)
Major findings:
-There was high agreement ( > 75%) on what to do in only 3 of the 10 vignettes
-None of the ethical issues were reported as more than occasionally a concern
-11 of the 17 ethical issues were rated as fairly serious or extremely serious by > 50% of respondents
-Modal number of hours in formal education (e.g., graduate coursework and CE courses) was zero
-Discussions with colleagues and graduate education rated as most useful in ethics issues