Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
4 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
What are all the cases in the enrichment list? |
Gebhadt v Saunders - plaintiff Greenwood v bennett - car Cressman v coys - licence plate sempra metals - interest Rowe - savingof a necessary expense (sewerage repair) Chief Constable v Wigan Gibb v maidstone Benedetti v Sawiris - services Littlewoods Retail - interest rate, borrowed at government rates |
|
|
Gebhardt v Saunders |
P ordered to fixed pipes to abate nuisance, even though as lessee not liable the D as landlord was liable. the expenses inucrred where for the D's use. P's claim for cost of repairs inucrred was allowed |
|
|
Chief constable v Wigan |
Club requested services of police, but not prepared to pay for what police proposed police provided more police than requested because thought that they were required to provide it Club did not Club did not request the special police servicesfor which the Chief Constable seeks to recoverF2 |
|
|
Littlewoods Retail Ltd presents an application and further analysis ofthe decision in Sempra Metals: |
o The case is distinct from Sempra Metals as the payment of tax in this case was not due at all (cf. the early payment of tax) Thegovernment argued on the basis of this reasoning that they had spent all of themoney and had not saved any extramoney by not borrowing<1st: o At first instance, Henderson held that thegovernment had the opportunityto use the money and this could not be refutedthe ̮( CA: CA held that the govt spent it on public resources, and assuch, couldn't be rebutted it was of benefit to them |
