• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/78

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

78 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
know from lecture the 3 characteristics of ( democracy) a democratic regime
participation, competition, and liberty
what are the 3 types of legitimacy as discussed in lecture
traditional, charismatic, legal-rational
traditional legitimacy
valid because “it has always been done this way.” Accepted over a long period of time. Historical myths and legends. Continuity between past and present. Exemplified by monarchies. Heavily institutionalized.
charismatic legitimacy
opposite of traditional. Charisma as the force of ideas. Embodied in a single individual. Weakly institutionalized
legal-rational legitimacy
based on neither rituals nor force of ideas. Based on laws, procedures. Rules are key – how did someone come into power? Exemplified by George Bush, though some might contest this.
what is inductive reasoning?
creates own theory
deductive reasoning
data driven, facts
quantitative method of research
gather numerical data for statistical analysis. look for patterns, test ideas
qualitative method of research
carry out intensive study of cases through archival research, and interviews
the uk is known to be a birthplace of which economic model?
liberalism
why was democratization in the uk a process of evolution and not revolution?
begain with the 13th century limitations on absolute monarchs and continuing incrementally to the establishment of the rule of law in the 17th century and the extension of suffrage to women in the 20th century. the process still persists today, with reforms of the anachronistic upper house of the legislature, decentralization of power, and ongoing discussions about electoral reform. unlike many other democracies the uk can not attach a specific date or event to the advent of its democracy.
the collapse of Communism is important for comparative politics because
it was not predicted
when an executive head is elected from within the legislature we usually refer to the legislative-executive system as
parliamentary (UK)
which term best describes the uk political regime
majoritarian
uks ethnic makeup
relatively homogeneous
scots are mainly catholic or presbyterian
english church of england
gay rights and abortion not politicized
degree of radical diversity
france's ethnic makeup
relatively homogeneous
uks relationship with the eu
european skeptic
france relationship with eu
a very much in to it
what did the magna carta do?
limited power of monarchy and established rule of law

a royal promise to uphold feudal customs and rights. the magna carta set an important precedent by limiting the power of British monarchs and subjecting them to the law. as a result the uk never experienced the type of royal absolutism that was common in other countries ( for ex russia) and this in turn helped pave the way for public control over government and the state
how did democratization weaken or strengthen institutions in the uk?
two factors gradually democratized parliament and further weakened monarchial power.

first was the rise of political parties. second was expansion of suffrage.
how did democratization weaken or strengthen institutions in france?
?
three estates in france?
catholic clergy or first estate had primary responsibility for administering the legal system, the landed aristocracy. second estate, prosecuted the kinds wars and financiers form the commoners who made up the commercial class, or third estate, gathered the taxes that paid for the military, the luxuries of the court, and the rest of the state apparatus.
why does the uk and france offer valuable study of regimes?
uk is the worlds oldest democracy
no written constitution
birthplace of industrial revolution
how has geography affected the development of regimes in france
has border tension with neighbors to the ne. lead to more centralized absolute monarchy
what legacies did louis the XI and his successors leave in france?
absolutism, strong standing army, in place until 1789
centralized state
how would you describe the legislative-executive relations in france? the uk?
uk parliamentary system
france- semi-presidential
charless de gaulle said he would only return to politics if what occurred?
strong head of state, strong executive model
states
states are organizations that maintain a monopoly of violence over a territory

refer to a national organization
regimes
political regimes
are the norms and rules regarding individual freedoms and collective equality , the locus of power and the use of that power.
democratic regimes
have rules that emphasize a large role for the public in governance, protect basic rights and freedoms, and attempt to ensure basic transparency of and accountability for government actions
Authoritarian regimes
limit the role of the public in decision making and often deny citizens basic rights and restrict their freedoms.
government
leadership or elite that administers the state
politics
?
coercion
rise of the state and institutions created inequality and harmed social balance (Rousseau)
consensus
social contract between ruler and ruled (Hobbes)
modernization theory
notion that if a country is to become more modern, they must look more like the US, UK, etc.)
o Dominant view post – WWII
o Articulate how countries modernize or fail to do so
o Hope to apply to American foreign policy
o Spread capitalism an democracy

as societies become more modern they inevitably become more democratic.
o Modernization associated with:
➢ More education
➢ Weakening of older, traditional institutions
➢ Greater gender equality
➢ Rise of middle class
behaviorism
(inherent to the notion of rationality, and that we are all rational beings)
o New approach to the study of comparative politics
o Rejected qualitative approaches
o Focused on behavior of individuals, not political structures
o Favored greater use of statistics and statistical data gathering
o Hope for a “grand theory” of politics
autonomy
?
capacity
?
sovereignty
ability to carry out actions independently of internal/external challengers
legitimacy
: a value where someone or something is recognized or accepted as right and proper.
o Confers authority and power
o Legitimate behavior is seen as the “right thing to do” from a sense of reciprocal responsibility
o Consensus over coercion
traditional legitimacy
valid because “it has always been done this way.” Accepted over a long period of time. Historical myths and legends. Continuity between past and present. Exemplified by monarchies. Heavily institutionalized.
charismatic legitimacy
opposite of traditional. Charisma as the force of ideas. Embodied in a single individual. Weakly institutionalized
rational-legal legitimacy
based on neither rituals nor force of ideas. Based on laws, procedures. Rules are key – how did someone come into power? Exemplified by George Bush, though some might contest this.
institutions
army, police, legislature, taxation
common law
a system based on local customs and precedent rather than formal legal codes. that system forms the basis of the contemporary legal systems of the uk ( with the exception of scotland) the united states, and many former british colonies
code law
law derived from from detailed legal codes rather than from precedent
ethnicity
refers to the specific attributes that make one group of people culturally different from others: for example customs. language, religion, geographical region, and history.
nationalism
a pride in ones people and the belief that they share a common political identity.
society
a broad term that refers to a complex human organization

collection of people bound by shared institutions that define how human relations are conducted
national identity
extent to which citizens of a country are bound together by a common set of political aspirations ( most often self-government and sovereignty)
citizenry
individuals or groups relationship to the state,
swear allegiance to the state
state provides benefits
people have obligations in return
majoritarian
majority in parliament has virtually unchecked power. unlike political parities in other democracies, even parliamentary democracies, the majority party in the uk can enact policies with few checks from other branches of government. also unlike other democracies, there are no formal constitutional limits on the central government, few judicial restraints, and no constitutionally sanctioned local authorities to dilute the power of the government
reign of terror
seizure of power and class war launched by radical jacobins in revolutionary france
coup d'etat
forceful and sudden overthrow of a government
laicit'e
complete separation of religion from public life in france.
federalism
significant power devolved to the local level by constitution, not easily taken away. (Ex: taxes, education, security – local police/militia
feudalism
: A Source of Democratization
o Though hardly a democratic institution, feudalism did create a system of mutual obligations at two levels:
➢ Lords and Peasants
➢ Monarchs and Lords
o Perhaps these obligations became the foundation for the eventual limits on royal power
absolute monarchy
the stage in the evolutionary development of europe between the more decentralized feudal monarchies of the middle ages and the constitutional governments of the modern era. made several important contributions to the modern french state
republic
information about the state is public, not just for leaders to know. leaders are elected directly by the people or appointed
cohabitation
french president is a different political party then his legislature. so he appoints an opposite prime minister so he can gain support of legislature.
blocked vote
a vote that forces the legislature to accept bills in their entirety and allows amendments only if approved by the government
motion of censure
an act of legislature against the government, requiring new elections when proposed legislation submitted as matters of confidence are not passed
constitutional council in france
has the power of abstract review, which is allowing it do decide questions that do not arise from legal cases, sometimes even allowing it to make judgments on legislation that has not yet been enacted
constitutional council
has the power of abstract review, which is allowing it do decide questions that do not arise from legal cases, sometimes even allowing it to make judgments on legislation that has not yet been enacted
council of state in france
it determines constitutionality of decrees and regulations. its the highest court and hears cases
understand
legislative-executive systems
parliamentary system
seen among our cases in germany, india, japan, uk) features an executive head of government ( often refereed to as a prime minister) who is usually elected from with in the legislature. the prime minister is usually the leader of the largest political party in the legislature. the pm and the cabinet ( the body of chief ministers or officials in gov in charge of such policy areas as defense, agriculture etc) are charged with formulating and executing policy. the head of state has largely ceremonial duties and is usually either an indirectly elected president or a hereditary monarch
difference between electoral and liberal democracy
electoral vote for themselves.
uks regime
highly majoritarian features.
parliament has virtually unchecked power
political attitudes?
o Radicals: seek revolutionary change, violently if necessary.
o Liberals: seek evolutionary change.
o Conservatives: seek little or no change of system.
o Reactionaries: seek to restore previous order, violently if necessary
political behaviors
?
semi-presidential system
legislative-executive systems
france and russia, this systems includes both a prime minister approved by the legislature and a directly elected president, with two sharing executive power. in practice, semi-presidential systems tend to produce strong presidents akin to those in pure presidential systems, nut the exact balance between the executives varies form case to case
presidential system
L-E S
used by brazil, mexico, and usa, combines the roles of head of state and head of government in the office of the president. these systems feature a directly elected president who holds most of the governments executive powers. Presidential systems have directly elected legislatures that to varying degrees serve as a check on presidential authority
proportional representation PR
most commonly used of the two. brazil, russia, and south africa employ this system. pr relies on multimember districts (MMDs) in which more than one legislature seat is contested in each electoral district. voters cast their ballots for a list of party candidates in each electoral district rather than for a single representative, and the percentage of votes a party receives in a district determines how many of that districts seats the party will win. this, the percentage of votes each party wins in each district should closely correspond to the percentage of seats allocated to each party. pr systems produce legislatures that often closely reflect the percentage of votes won nationwide by each political party. as a result they tend to foster multiple political parties, including small ones
Single member districts (SMDs)
france, uk, usa. in these systems, there is only one representative active for each constituency, and in each district the candidate with the greatest number of votes( not necessarily a majority) wins the seat. As opposed to pr systems, SMD votes cast for all but the one winning candidate are, in effect, wasted: that is, they do not count toward any representation in the legislature. SMD systems tend to discriminate against small parties, especially those with a national following rather than a geographically concentrated following.
mixed electoral system
germany, japan, and mexico voters are given two votes, one for a candidate and the other for a party. Candidates in smds are elected on the basis of a plurality; other seats are elected from MMDs are allocated using PR
france regime
semi-presidential
what are duvergers laws
pr that leads to many party
two round leads to multiple party
1st past post smd result in two parties