• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
ego theory
we are one unified self, inner self is the experiencer, changes gradually but same "me", self is continuous entity. problems: multiple personality, split brain
bundle theory
unified self is an illusion, only experiences linked together, there is no "someone". problem: why do we feel like there is? what is the use in this
interpreter
LH makes up a reason for bodily reactions even when it is not getting information from the RH
teletransporter thought experiment
ego vs bundle theorist, is there an inextricable link between our bodies and minds, can we replicate our bodies and still be "me", are we more than biology
NCC
study of neural functioning and correlate it with reports of conscious experience
binding by synchrony
no single area of visual consciousness but rather a combination of many areas firing at once
zeke's theory of microconsciousness
not one unified consciousness byt many levels of parallel processing
Multisensory integration
superior colliculus; more than one sensory input relating to same object are processed at one time leading to consciousness
unity of consciousness
unifying experiences, are one self with one conscious or are we multiple parallel streams of consciousness? how do we feel things in a unified manner?
sane vs insane automatism
insane = disease of the mind, sane= outside influences like stress, trama, hypnosis, drugs
Sesmets
Pearls, multiple selves exist like pearls on a string, no longterm continuity, selves are subjects of experience that are single mental things may be short or long, had unity at any given moment
James' Theory
between ego and bundle, believes in the 3 mes and an I. Mes are social, spiritual and material. I is the feeling of experiences. Thought ties it all together into unified experience
neuroscientific model
conscious experiences are input to executive system of neuronal processing. Brain processes give rise to the illusion of self
Dennet
no inner self, center of narrative gravity, self is a web of words they spin us we don't spin them
Wegner's 3 requirements
thought must occur before action, must be consistent with it and must not be accompanied by other causes. all leads to mislabelling
libet's study of voluntary actions
subject moved wrist, said what time on clock they decided and measure RP. RP first then W then action
churchland on self control
easier to measure/understand than free will. can understand the neurobiological profile of brain with normal vs impaired control in prefrontal cortex. related to punishment and reward
3 theories on phantom pain
stump nerves, spinal cord nerves, somatosensory in brain
melzack's theory on phantom pain
in cerebrum not somatosensory, believes in predisposed neuromatrix which senses "self"
raichle
used skill learning to determine NCC of consciousness
lamme
believes NCC can/must be found without behavioral methods, argues recurrent processing the key to consciousness, believes in multiple streams of consciousness and that it is different from attention
mackay
20 questions, argued that split brain are still one
gazzniga
two conscious streams in split brain
functions of LH
interpreter, language
function of RH
better at specific memory, still has some independence and free will
Mcsherry
dissociation should be defined by presence of identity confusion, derealization, depersonalization, amnesia, identity alteration
Ramachandra & Hubbard
cross activation thoery in synesthetics, same neural structures give rise to different feelings/qualia, super unified consciousness