• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/76

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

76 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Social Psychology

incredibly broad field, lots of subdivisions; scientific study how we think about influence and relate to one another

Fundamental Attribution Era

assume behavior is inherent, not conditioned

Power of Situation

can make people do horrible things

Power of the Person

individuals respond differently

Importance of Cognition

think differently + applicability of social psychological principles

Social cognition

The general process we use to make sense out of social events, which may or may not include other people

Sociology

the study of society; how people act within, looks more at groups than individuals, more field research, observational rather than experimental

Theories of Personality

really in depth person rather than average person, longer history than social psych

Social Psych began in...

the 1960's

1940's

Prejudice

1950's

Conformity

1960's

Agression

Post-9/11

terror-management

Social representation

socially shared beliefs, helps make sense of the world/our values influence our ideas and experiments

Naturalistic fallacy

era of defining what’s good; what is observable (Be aware of being subjective)

Hindsight bias

tendency to exaggerate one’s ability to have foreseen how something turned out

Observational description

what’s the nature of the phenomenon

Correlation prediction

if know x, can predict y?

Experimental Causality

does variable x cause y?

Systematic observation

trained scientist solving q’s by observing + coding it by a criteria

Participant observation

joining a cult to see reaction/tries not to alter situation

Archival Analysis

looking @ archive data, observing through recorded data

Correlation method

2 or more variables, systematically measured, assess relationship-- Positive or negative, closer to one, stronger relationship

Experimental Method

random assignment ≠ random sampling (random sampling comes before assignment)-- Only have one independent variable to manipulate and record results

IV

manipulated variable

DV

measured variable

Internal validity

the IV the only thing affecting the DV

External validity

you generate results to other situations

Basic Research

best answer to why people behave in a certain way… satisfies curiosity

Applied Research

intended to solve problem

Self-concept

answer to the question “Who am I”; your ideas and beliefs about who YOU are; usually includes the roles we play and personality traits we have (specific to Western cultures)→ fluxuates EX: becoming a parent

Self-esteem

one’s overall self-evaluation or sense of worth

Self-schema

specific beliefs by which you define who you are, the elements of your self-concept

Self-reference effect

tendency to process efficiently information related to oneself

Two Factor Theory of Emotion

diff. emotions can have the same psychological responses. EX: sweaty palms for attraction and sweaty palms for fear

Social comparison

evaluating one’s abilities and opinions by comparing oneself to others (surroundings will impact how u view urself)

3 TYPES OF SOCIAL COMPARISONS:




UPWARD, DOWNWARD, LATERAL

UPWARD- Comparing self to someone better than u




DOWNWARD- Comparing self to some1 worse than you




LATERAL- Comparing self to someone same as you

Schadenfreude

taking joy in other’s misfortunes

Individualism

(Western cultures) giving priority to own goals over group goals; defining identity in terms of personal attributes rather than group identification

Collectivism

(Asian cultures) giving priority to the goals of one’s groups & defining identity accordingly EX: “I am a Buddhist, Asian, etc”

Self-efficacy

feeling of competency and effectiveness EX low self esteem in math, self esteem high in everything else, but anxious over math




Self efficacy ≠ self-esteem

Locus of Control

extent to which ppl percieve outcomes as under their control or controlled by external events

Internal and External Locus of Control

Internal: You feel you can control what happens to you : “I have control of my actions”




External: out of one’s control, doesn’t matter what you do; FAITH, COINCIDENCE

Learned helplessness EX?

dogs- shocked in cage




People- abusive relationships




RESULT:


Both: stop looking for a way to leave

Self-serving bias

the tendency to perceive oneself favorably

THREE TYPES OF EXCUSES

“I didn’t do it”-- refusal to admit to wrongdoing, common in children“




It’s not so bad”-- Admitting to fault but perceiving wrongdoing as subjectively appropriate/okay




“Yes, but…”-- Admitting to ignorance or incompetence but not malicious intent

Self-Presentation

act of expressing oneself and behaving in ways designed to create a favorable impression


EX: false modesty (fishing for compliments PURPOSELY)

Self-handicapping

protecting one’s self-image w/ behaviors that create a handy excuse for later failure (can be done subconsciously)


EX: “There’s no way I’m passing this exam” and going out drinking instead of studying

Self-monitoring

being attuned to how we present ourselves in social situations and adjusting performance to create a desired impression


EX: JOB INTERVIEW, ACTING

High self-monitors

more likely to adjust behavior to the situation more likely to express an opinion, seen as tactful and adaptable

Low self-monitors

more likely to speak and act as they really believe, rigid and stubborn, but honest and forthright

Impression formation

process by which observers integrate various sources of information about other’s self-presentation into a unified and consistent judgement

Nonverbal behavior

6 universally recognized emotions: happy, sad, disgusted, shocked/surprised, fear, anger

Attribution Theory

the theory of how ppl explain other’s behavior

Internal Attribution Theory

deciding one’s personality is the underlying cause of their behavior

External attribution theory

deciding one’s situation is the underlying cause of their behavior

KELLEY’S ATTRIBUTION THEORY Says:

we use 3 different factors when we are making our attributions

DISTINCTIVENESS

Information about the extent to which one particular actor behaves in the same way to different objects

CONSISTENCY

Information about the extent to which the behavior between one actor and the object is the same between time & circumstances

CONSENSUS

Information abt the extent to which other ppl behave in the same way toward the same object as the actor does

Fundamental attribution error

when explaining someone else’s behavior, we underestimate the impact of the situation and overestimate the influence of traits and attributes

actor/observer difference

we have a different perspective when we are observing other’s behavior than when we’re performing the behavior (POV, WHEN WE ARE THE ACTOR)

Schemas

mental templates by which we organize our words

Priming

activating particular associations of one’s inital conceptions, as when the basis for one’s belief is discredited but an explaination of why the belief might be true survives




EX: “people who take risks are the best firefighters”


Years later, it is proven to person X that people who are careful are the “best” firefighters


REMEDY?


Person X must spend the time to accept the facts and fight preconditioned beliefs

Overconfidence Phenomenon

the tendency to be more confident than correct; to overstimate the accuracy of one’s beliefs

Confirmation bias

tendency to search for information that confirms one’s preconceptions

Behavioral confirmation

a tendency for perceivers to behave as if their expectations are correct and the targets then respond in ways that can confirm the perceiver’s beliefs

Heuristics

mental shortcuts or rules of thumb; so for efficiency not accuracy

Representative heuristic

strategy of judging the likelihood of things by how well they represent or match particular prototypes

anchoring and adjustment heuristic

using a number or value as a starting point and then adjusting it sufficiently

availability heuristic

shortcut used to estimate the frequency or likelihood of an event based on how quickly examples of it come to mind (tends to bias our interpretations)

counterfactual thinking

the tendency to create positive alternatives to a negative outcome that already occurred

Illusory correlation

perception of a relationship where none exists




EX: “When couples stop trying, that's when they conceive”


“It always rains when I'm wearing my glasses”


“Birds always crap on my car right after I clean it”

Illusion of control

the idea that chance events are subject to our influence




EX: wearing lucky socks before the big game

Regression toward the average

the statistical tendency for extreme scores or extreme behavior to return towards one’s average

Heuristics are...

easier and quicker


THINK: accuracy v. efficiency