Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
3 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
3.1 Evaluation |
Diagnosing DB -Reliability, lower due to SR -Validity, construct no evidence to prove an illness is an illness. Empirical validity, case history driven -Ad, good inter rator, standardised clinical interviews, no diagnosis no treatment -dis, symptom driven, people shoehorned, faking, subjective -comparison, DSM (american, psychological, priced, members) ICD (uk, both, free access) -Ethnocentric, homo, race, gender
|
|
|
3.2 Evaluation |
Explanations of DB -Reliab, self report, subjectivity -Valid, con Torgersen, pop Watson, all lack EV -Nature bio, Nurture beh -all Reductionist - bio hard det, beh enviro det and cog soft det -Ethno bio least, cog most -all 3 believe in exp but lack agreed paradigm -cognitive beh therapy useful and bio useful for medicine -Ethical issue in Watson
|
|
|
3.3 Evaluation |
Treatment of DB -Reliab, too sub, rating scales -Valid, pop Lucy, Internal IMD good rep but ID, control groups lack blinds - Nature bio, Nurture beh -all Reductionist - bio hard det, beh enviro det and cog soft det -Ethno bio least, cog most -all 3 believe in exp but lack agreed paradigm -all 3 studies show improvements -Bio has possible side effects
|
