Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
44 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
US v LUDWIG |
Certification of a k9 to 58% reliability is sufficient for PC |
|
|
US v KITCHELL |
Contamination does not undermine positive dog alert |
|
|
US v SHARP |
K9 sniffing exterior and jumping through window is a search and lawful |
|
|
US v RACE |
Indication of well trained dog is sufficient PC |
|
|
US v PLACE |
Sniffing personal items in public place is not search |
|
|
US v THOMAS |
Searching of an apartment is still a search and required PC |
|
|
STATE v BOYCE |
Use of K9 to sniff person requires reasonable suspicion. |
|
|
ROBINETTE v BARNES |
A dog is not deadly force |
|
|
US v LOVELL |
Lovell’s luggage was sniffed at airport not a search |
|
|
MATTHEWS v JONES |
Not excessive force to release dog after officer gave warnings. |
|
|
MERRETT v MOORE |
K9 can be used at a license and registration check |
|
|
US v. GUZMAN |
The handlers interest in the dogs alert can be used as PC |
|
|
US v KENNEDY |
Dog certified in detecting drugs to 70-80% is PC |
|
|
US v ANCHONDO |
A search incident to arrest can occur before arrest |
|
|
VATHEKAN v PRINCE GEORGE |
Don’t release dog without warning into private home |
|
|
VERA CRUZ v ESCONDIDO |
Use of dog to assist in arrest is not deadly force |
|
|
US v OWENS |
Dog certified at time of sniff is sufficient in finding PC |
|
|
INDIANAPOLIS v EDMOND |
It is unlawful to set up a checkpoint for drugs. |
|
|
KUHA v MINNETONKA |
Releasing a dog with warning is a constitutional right but can be ignored if officer is at risk. |
|
|
MILLER v CLARK COUNTY |
Biting and holding fleeing felony for up to a minute is justified. |
|
|
US v MOHR |
Unreasonable to release dog on surrendered suspect. |
|
|
US v OUTLAW |
Dog certified in variety of drugs alerted on PCP still reasonable suspicion. |
|
|
US v RAMIREZ |
Investigation into a package does not have to stop because dog didn’t alert. |
|
|
US v JACKSON |
Officers boarded a public bus and dog alerted where Jackson was sitting is reasonable suspicion |
|
|
ILLINOIS v CABALLES |
Drug dog can be used to sniff on traffic stop |
|
|
US v SANCHEZ |
Delaying stop to run computer checks for 45 mins is reasonable. |
|
|
US v MENDOZA |
Court observed that waiting 40 minutes for a dog was reasonable. |
|
|
US v SUITT |
Extended stop 3 minutes for search found 32 bales of marijuana. |
|
|
FLORIDA v HARRIS |
Must present an exhaustive set of records including logs and performance records. |
|
|
FLORIDA v JARDINES |
Taking K9 onto porch of defendants house requires a search warrant or consent. |
|
|
US v SALGADO |
Dog was 1 hour always and court said wait was reasonable. |
|
|
RODRIGUEZ v US |
Traffic stop can not be extended without reasonable suspicion or PC |
|
|
US v PINA |
Trooper contacted passenger bus and searched baggage search was lawful |
|
|
US v WHITAKER |
Consent to search common apartment hallways was lawful. |
|
|
BROWN v BATTLECREEK |
Deadly force against a dog is reasonable. |
|
|
US v BERRY |
Probable cause does not dissipate with time. |
|
|
COLORADO v MCKNIGHT |
Dog trained to detect marihuana where it is legal is not probable cause. |
|
|
MONTANEZ v PARKER |
Dog unintentionally biting suspect without officer commands is not excessive force. |
|
|
US v WHITAKER |
Consent to search common apartment hallways was lawful. |
|
|
BROWN v BATTLECREEK |
Deadly force against a dog is reasonable. |
|
|
US v BERRY |
Probable cause does not dissipate with time. |
|
|
COLORADO v MCKNIGHT |
Dog trained to detect marihuana where it is legal is not probable cause. |
|
|
MONTANEZ v PARKER |
Dog unintentionally biting suspect without officer commands is not excessive force. |
|
|
ESCOBAR v MONTEE |
Escobar had a knife dog was sent without alert and was not excessive force. |
