• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/6

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

6 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
When reading argumentative questions on the L-sat the first step involves what type of thinking?
Making sure you are thinking critically.
The conclusion of a argumentative question on the L-sat is really nothing more than what?
An Idea
When dealing with an argumentative question, evaluating whether the evidence alone is able to support the conclusion without making a large leap, we can question what of the argument.
The validity of the argument
All of the arguments on the L-sac where the author is advancing the conclusion have some kind of what or are supported by what?
Evidence, all conclusions are supported by evidence, except for passages.
Since arguments on the L-sat are flawed in someway, it is important to remember or pay attention to what, how, and where?
What the author is trying to persuade you of.
How the author is making the case.
Where the author has lapsed in that attempt.
Why would you want to pay attention to what the author is trying to persuade you of, when examining an L-sat argumentative question?
Because the author in most cases is not presenting and airtight case for a point of view, so the vast majority of arguments are flawed in someway.