Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
40 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
sub-components of language
|
phonemes
morphemes syntax |
|
phonemes
|
smallest unit of speech - the sound
45 phonemes in english language |
|
morphemes
|
meaningful units of language that make up words
|
|
syntax
|
set of rules used for arrangement of morphemes into meaningful sentences
i.e. "man bites dog" "dog bites man" syntax tells us what is incorrect |
|
development of human language during infancy
|
birth - 2 months = cooing
2 mos - 12 mos = babbling 12 mos = first word 2 yrs - 7 yrs = holophrases and telegraphic speech, adds 6-10 words a day |
|
overextension v. underextension
|
over: when a child incorrectly uses a word to describe a wider set of objects
i.e. inside of a flower, wheel or anything round is a ball - every woman is mama under: incorrectly uses word to describe narrow set of objects i.e. toy box filled with multiple trucks and asks for truck, when parent gives it to them it is wrong "truck" |
|
behaviorist perspective on language acquisition
|
places great emphasis on the role of reinforcement and imitation
|
|
nativist perspective on language acquisition
|
assumes that children make use of language acquisition device (LAD) to acquire transformational rules which enable them to easily translate between surface structure and deep structure
|
|
interactionist perspective on language acquisition
|
biology and experience both make important contributions to the development of language
|
|
evidence on language acquisition in animals
|
chimp learning sign language
pygmy chimpanzee could differentiate between chasing and being chased = grammatical rules |
|
research on monolingual and bilingual children
|
research suggests that bilingual and monolingual children are largely similar in that the course and rate of their language development
|
|
superordinate v. subordinate concepts
|
super: very broad, top of food chain, Amber's mug->container -- can continue to break down
sub: very specific grouping - schwebels rye bread --can't break down anymore |
|
concept hierarchy
|
levels of concepts from general to specific
|
|
two types of concepts
|
natural
artificial |
|
natural concepts
|
mental representation of objects/events drawn from personal experience - images and emotions
|
|
prototype
|
ideal example of a conceptual category
|
|
artificial concepts
|
defined by rules - dictionary definition, math
|
|
three types of problems - Greeno
|
problems of arrangement
problems of inducing structure problems of transformation |
|
problems of arrangement
|
require people to arrange the parts of a problem in a way that satisfies a criterion. parts can be arranged in many ways, but only one or few form a solution.
|
|
problems of inducing structure
|
require people to discover the relations among numbers, words, symbols or ideas.
|
|
problems of transformation
|
require people to carry out a sequence of transformations in order to reach a specific goal.
|
|
how irrelevant information can hinder problem solving
|
leads people astray
has adverse effects on reasoning |
|
functional fixedness
|
the tendency to perceive an item only in terms of its most common use
|
|
how functional fixedness can hinder problem solving
|
rigid way of thinking of an objects use can cause difficulties
|
|
mental set
|
exists when people persist in using problem solving strategies that have worked in the past
|
|
how mental set can hinder problem solving
|
tends to put one's mind in a rut
rigid |
|
how unnecessary constraints can hinder problem solving
|
nine dot problem
people place constraint that aren't stated |
|
algorithms
|
methodical, step-by-step procedure for trying all possible alternatives in searching for a solution to a problem
|
|
heuristics
|
a guiding principal or rule of thumb used in solving problems or making decisions
|
|
how working backwards can assist in problem solving
|
if you're working with a problem that has a well-specified end point may be easier to start at the end and work backwards
|
|
how searching for analogies can assist in problem solving
|
if you can spot an analogy between problems, you may be able to use the solution to a previous problem to solve a current one
|
|
how forming subgoals can assist in problem solving
|
intermediate steps toward solution
facilitate solution |
|
field dependent
|
rely on external frames of reference and tend to accept the physical environment as a given instead of trying to analyze or restructure it
tend to focus on the total context of a problem instead of zeroing in on specific aspects or breaking it into component parts |
|
field independent
|
rely on internal frames of reference and tend to analyze and try to restructure the physical environment rather than accepting it
more likely to focus on specific features of a problem and to recognize component parts |
|
convergent v. divergent thinking
|
divergent: brainstorming -- thinking that produces many alternatives or ideas
convergent: thinking directed toward discovery of an established correct answer |
|
how representative heuristics often lead to incorrect conclusions
|
basing estimated probability of an event or person on how similar it is to your prototype.
i.e. cheerleaders are dumb, blondes are dumb |
|
how availability heuristics often lead to incorrect conclusions
|
basing estimated probability of an event on the ease with which relevant instances come to mind
|
|
confirmation bias
|
makes us pay attention to events that confirm our beliefs and ignore evidence that contradicts them
|
|
hindsight bias
|
tendency after learning about an event to believe that one could have predicted the outcome in advance
"I KNEW IT ALL ALONG" |
|
anchoring bias
|
bias heuristic caused by basing an estimate on completely unrelated quantity
car dealers/real estate agents -- show you expensive first then downgrade to make you think you're getting a great deal |