• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/44

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

44 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Rostker v. Goldberg
women could not be drafted
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
desegregation of schools with "all deliberate speed"
Swann v. Charleotte-Mecklenburg Board of Ed.
busing and redrawing district lines to integrate public schools
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S.
congress has power to prohibit discrimination in private businesses
Regents of the Univ. of CA v. Bakke
affirmative action quotas are constitutional. "diversity" legit goal...but not take race as sole criterion for admissions
Buckley v. Valeo
limits $ given individually to political campaigns. candidate can personally use as much of own $-freedom of speech
Clinton v. City of NY
Line Item Veto unconstitutional
McCulloch v. Maryland
federal law supreme over state law. power to "necessary and proper" clause
South Dakota v. Dole
raise minimum drinking age to 21 or lose federal highway funds
Wesberry v. Sanders
NO apportionment system (congressional districts vary greatly in size)
Prinz v. U.S.
invalidated a fed law that required local police to conduct background checks on all gun purchases. ruled: violated 10th amendment--forcing state govs to carry out fed regulatory programs
Shaw v. Reno
Race canNOT be main factor in drawing congressional district lines
Marbury v. Madison
Supreme Court could declare an act of Congress unconstitutional
Weeks v. Ohio
Court forbids ill-gotten evidence. EXCLUSIONARY RULE: illegally obtained evidence could not be used in federal court
Terry v. Ohio
stop and frisk
Miranda v. Arizona
suspect must be informed of his/her rights
Gideon v. Wainwright
can't afford attorny, state will provide one
Texas v. Johnson
flag burning protected: form of symbolic speech
Engel v. Vitale
school sanctioned prayer unconsitutional
Gregg v. Georgia
death penalty constitutional
--imposed based on circumstances of case
Furman v. Georgia
death penalty unconstitutional
--imposed arbitrarily
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Lemon Test: law must
1) have primarily secular purpose
2) principle effect must neither aid nor inhibit religion
3) it must not create excessive entanglement between gov and religion
Schenck v. U.S.
speech that created IMMINENT DANGER is not protected
** Gitlow v. New York **
incorporation of FREE SPEECH to states
Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Community School
symbolic speech protected by 1st Amendment
Miller v. California
standards for obscenity:

1) major theme appeals to indecent sexual desires applying to modern day community standards
2) shows in clearly offensive way sexual behavior outlaws by state law
3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value
Reno v. A.C.L.U.
free speech on internet:
very hard to regulate
Near v. Minnesota
incorporation of free press to states:
NO prior restraint (cannot ban offensive publications)
New York Times v. Sullivan
protected statements about public officials
New York Times v. U.S.
reaffirmed ban on prior restraint:
refused to stop publication of Pentagon Papers
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
school district censorship of student newspapers as long as it is related to legitimate concerns
United States v. Leon
good faith exception:

searches done illegally under assumption it was legal
+added to exclusionary rule
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
no "fighting words"
Roth v. U. S.
obscenity NOT protected under 1st amendment
De Jonge v. Oregon
Right of Assembly incorporated to states
New Jersey v. T.L.O
student can be searched at school by school officials. ruled almost no privacy when on grounds of school.
Bethel School District v. Frasier
school officials can punish student for statements made in a speech at school
Griswold v. Connecticut
"zones of privacy"

enhanced concept of enumerated rights (9th amendment)
Roe v. Wade
constitutional right of privacy for woman to determine whether to terminate a pregnancy
Planned parenthood v. Casey
reaffirmed Roe v. Wade but upheld certain limits...
Mapp v. Ohio
Court ruled that evidence obtained without search warrant was excluded from trial in state courts
Escobedo v. Illinois
person cannot be forced to self incriminate
Webster v. Reproductive Health
states allowed to ban abortions:
from public hospitals
doctors permitted to see if fetuses were viable
Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith
state could deny unemployment benefits to a fired person for violating a state prohibition (like use of certain drugs, peyote in this case)