Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
96 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Civil liberties
|
Personal guarantees and freedoms that the federal government cannot abridge by law, constitution, or judicial interpretation.
|
|
Civil rights
|
The government-protected rights of individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment
|
|
Bill Of Rights
|
The first ten amendment of the constitution that largely guarantees specific rights and liberties
|
|
Ninth Amendment
|
Part of BOR; "Enumeration in constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people
|
|
Tenth Amendment
|
Part of BOR; reiterates powers not delegated to national gov't are reserved to states/ppl
|
|
due process clause
|
Clause contained in 5th & 14th amendments. Over yrs, it has been constructed to guarantee to individuals a variety of rights ranging from economic liberty to criminal procedural rights to protection from arbitrary govt action.
|
|
substantive due process
|
Judicial interpretation of 5th/14th amendment's due process clauses that protects citizens from artbitrary or unjust laws
|
|
incorporation doctrine
|
interpretation of constitution that holds that the due process clause of 14th amendment requires that states and local govt guarantee the rights
|
|
selective incorporation
|
judicial doctrine whereby most but not all of protections found in BOR are made applicable to the states via 14th amendment
|
|
fundamental freedoms
|
rights defined by court to be essential to order, liberty, and justice and therefore entitled to the highest standard of review, strict scrutiny
|
|
1st amendment
|
BOR; restricts the fed govt w/ respect to civil liberties of the people, ex) freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition
|
|
establishment clause
|
1st clause in 1st amendment; natl govt cant est natl religion
|
|
free exercise clause
|
2nd clause of 1st amendment; freedom of religion, govt cant interfere
|
|
prior restraint
|
constitutional doctrine; govt cant prohibit speech/publicatiomn b4 the fact. violation of first amendment
|
|
clear and present danger test
|
test by S.C. in case Schenck v. US(1919) to draw line b/e protected and unprotected speech; if words create clear/present danger that there will be substantive evils, congress will prevent
|
|
direct incitement test
|
test by S.C. in case Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) that says govt only punish advocacy of illegal action only if "advocacy is directed to intiice/produce immiment lawless action/protests
|
|
symbolic speech
|
forms of expressions protected as speech
|
|
libel/slander
|
untrue statements, libel is printed; slander is spoken, false, defaming statements
|
|
fighting words
|
words that" by their utterance inflict injury or incite breach of peace"- first amendment
|
|
writs of habeous corpus
|
prove prisoner held lawfully and prisoner allowed free if judge not persuaded by govt's case- these rights imply prisoners have right to know charges against them
|
|
ex post facto law
|
prohibited by constitution; actions committed before law passes, for US is legal bc not a law before
|
|
bill of attainder
|
prohibited by US constitution; legislative punishment w/o judicial action
|
|
4th amendment
|
BOR; protects people from unreasonable searches by fed gov't. it also somewhat what may or may not be searched- warrants by probable cause required
|
|
5th amendment
|
"no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" thus govt restricted w/ respect to rights of ppl. law is -protection of self-incrimination, inditement of grand jury allowed and cannot deny ppl w/o due process
govt cannot take land w/o conpensation |
|
Miranda Rights
|
statements must be made by police informing a suspect of constitutional rights protected by 5th- ex) lawyer
|
|
double jeopardy clause
|
part of 5th that protects individuals from being tried twice for same offense
|
|
exclusionary rule
|
judicially created rule, prohibits police from using illegally seized evidence at trial
|
|
6th amendment
|
govt guarantees to accused person assistance of court in his defense. rights to speedy/public trial, impartial juries, trials in state where crime committed, notice of charges, right to confront/obtain favorable witnesses, right to counsel
|
|
8th amendment
|
excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted
|
|
right to privacy
|
judicially created principle that individual actions protected by amendments. includes 1,2,4,9,14 amendments
BOR; some areas of life meant to be private, |
|
13th amendment
|
civil rights amendment, bans slavery
|
|
black codes
|
laws denying most legal rights that newly freed slaves just got; passed by southern states after civil war
|
|
14th amendment
|
civil war amendment; guarantees equal protection/due process of law of all u.s. citizens
|
|
15th amendment
|
enfanchised newly freed slaves, rights for citizens to vote regardless of color, race, creed etc.
|
|
jim crow laws
|
laws by southern states that discriminated against blacks by creating whites only public accomodations
|
|
civil rights cases (1883)
|
five cases under civil rights act of 1875. SC decided that discrimination that state laws enact could not be prohibited by fed govt, private discrimination is allowed
|
|
poll tax
|
obvious
|
|
grandfather clause
|
in southern states where only allow those who grandfathers had voted before reconstruction to vote unless they passed a literacy/wealth test
|
|
suffrage movement
|
drive for voting rights for women
|
|
19th amendment
|
women right to vote
|
|
equal protection clause
|
part of 14th amendment; guarantees all citizens equal protections of law
|
|
civil rights act of 1964
|
wide-ranging legislation passed by congress to outlaw segregation in public facilities/ discrimination in employment. edu, voting. also it created the equal employment opportunity commission
|
|
de jure discrimination
|
racial segregation thats a direct result of a law or official policy
|
|
de facto discrimination
|
racial discrimination that results from practice (ex. housing patterns) rather than law
|
|
equal employment opportunity commission
|
fed agency created to enforce civil rights act of 1964- which forbids discrimination
|
|
women's equality amendment
|
proposed amendment to constitution stating "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by US of state on the account of sex"
|
|
suspect classifcation
|
category/class that triggers highest standard of scrutiny from SC
|
|
strict scrutiny
|
heightened standard of review used by SC to determine the constitutional validity of challenged practice
|
|
title IX
|
provision of educational amendments of 1972 that bars edu institutions recieving fed funds from discriminating against females
|
|
affirmative action
|
policies designed to give special attention/compensatory treatment to members of previously disadvantaged groups
|
|
lemon v kurtzman
|
money from teachers cant go to teachers, 3 rules: 1. secular
2. govt action not affect religion 3. govt action not entangle w religion |
|
lynch v donnelly
|
reliogus displays ok if for all religiions and for holiday purpose, not religous, not advances the religion
|
|
zelman v simmon-harris
|
money ok for catholic schools if for kids, not other things tho bc of establishment clause
|
|
engel v vitale
|
NY, non demoninationa prayer un constituonal
|
|
abingdom v schempp/ murrrary v curtlett
|
no go on school prayer
|
|
Gomillion v. Lightfoot
|
violated 15th amendment by redistrciting
|
|
crawford v marion county
|
indiana- upheld that id required is ok
|
|
wallace v jaffee
|
moment of silence unconstitutional
|
|
westwide v mergens
|
bible club ok bc social club
|
|
lee v weisman
|
no prayer at graduation, cant make student choose b/e graduation and religion
|
|
santa fe v doe
|
no prayer at hs football games
|
|
west virginia v. barnette
|
kids didnt do pledge bc jehovahs witness
|
|
wisconsin v yoder
|
amish kids dont have to go to h.s.
|
|
sherbert v. verner
|
no work on saturday, bc religion, company still has to pay them. SC protected action for first time
|
|
reynolds v us
|
no pologomy
|
|
oregon v smith
|
no peyote bc drug, even if for religion
|
|
lukumi v hialeah
|
illegal for hialeah to prohibit animal sacrifice
|
|
gonzales v o centru
|
SC ruled can use houscoa
|
|
schenk v US
|
war pamphlets pass-out illegal bc clear/ danger
|
|
gitlow v NY
|
distribute socialist manifesto, also c/p danger upgraded to bad tendency- might cause bad stuff to govt- 14th amendment- selective incorportation- extended to states reverseal of barron v. baltimore, where BOR only federal
|
|
brandenburg v ohio
|
kkk guy said bad things, but not direct incitement
|
|
symbolic expression is not as protected as free speech
|
ok, remember that
|
|
tinker v des moines
|
kids protest nam w black bands, ok bc politcal expression
|
|
texas v johnson/ us eichman
|
burned flag- ok bc political expression, congress mad and made it illegal, guy did it again and SC said again that law illegal and ok to burn the flag
|
|
roth/miller
|
rules, work taken as whole,
1. lewd as whole 2. sexual as a whole 3. not artistic, literary etc as whole |
|
ny times v US (pentagon papers)
|
stolen papers, us argue cant print bc embaressing and didnt argue if it would be c/p to us
|
|
ny times v sullivan
|
must be false and malcious to be tried
|
|
mapp v ohio
|
looking for fugitive, found porn, illegal bc seach warrant didnt say that
|
|
us v leon
|
this narrows exclusionary rule with the good faith exception; police get a legit warrant but if see something in plain sight, or things you control, its ok; police get more power than individual
|
|
miranda v arizona
|
didnt know he didnt have to talk
|
|
gideon v wainwright
|
petty theif, jailed bc no lawyer, got a lawyer and got free. eventally over time, court made it more and more mandatory for lawyers to be present for convicts
|
|
furman v georgia
|
death penalty unconstituional, more blacks got penalty, arbitrary
|
|
greg v georgia
|
death penalty did not violate equal protection clause, must prove racial discrimation at hand
|
|
griswold v conneticut
|
contraceptions ok bc private and between married people, parent planning
|
|
roe v wade
|
based off griswold v conneticut; abortion to states earlier, but now fed law, legal for first trimester, rules for second, and prohibited in 3rd; SC exceeded constitution authority by writing laws, if decision is overturned, it is based off griswold
|
|
substantive due process
|
look into 5/14 amendment
|
|
bowers v hardwick
|
gay rights ruled illegal
|
|
lawrence v texas
|
overturned hardwick, activity only illegal if gay, thus discriminatory
|
|
slaughterhouse case
|
obliterated 14th amendment, it didnt apply locally, it said blacks not members of states
|
|
civil rights cases of 1875 or 83
|
literacy test/ grandfather clause ok, fed govt cant stop private discrimination
|
|
plessy v furgeson
|
s.c. upheld seperate but equal
|
|
sweatt v painter/mclaurin v oklahoma
|
tex law school unconstitutional, seperate not equal, must integreate bc 14th amendment's equal protection clause
|
|
brown v BOE
|
segregated schools illegal under equal protection clause of 14th amendment, then in 1955 ruled to desegrgate with all deliberate action
|
|
regents of cal v bakke
|
bars quota system, but allows affirmative action, bakke won w. equal protectio clause of 14th amendment
|
|
grutter v bollinger
|
law school, ok for them to consider race bc individual approach
|
|
gratz v bolinger
|
points system unconstituonal bc too mechanic for admissions process
|