• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/96

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

96 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Civil liberties
Personal guarantees and freedoms that the federal government cannot abridge by law, constitution, or judicial interpretation.
Civil rights
The government-protected rights of individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment
Bill Of Rights
The first ten amendment of the constitution that largely guarantees specific rights and liberties
Ninth Amendment
Part of BOR; "Enumeration in constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people
Tenth Amendment
Part of BOR; reiterates powers not delegated to national gov't are reserved to states/ppl
due process clause
Clause contained in 5th & 14th amendments. Over yrs, it has been constructed to guarantee to individuals a variety of rights ranging from economic liberty to criminal procedural rights to protection from arbitrary govt action.
substantive due process
Judicial interpretation of 5th/14th amendment's due process clauses that protects citizens from artbitrary or unjust laws
incorporation doctrine
interpretation of constitution that holds that the due process clause of 14th amendment requires that states and local govt guarantee the rights
selective incorporation
judicial doctrine whereby most but not all of protections found in BOR are made applicable to the states via 14th amendment
fundamental freedoms
rights defined by court to be essential to order, liberty, and justice and therefore entitled to the highest standard of review, strict scrutiny
1st amendment
BOR; restricts the fed govt w/ respect to civil liberties of the people, ex) freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition
establishment clause
1st clause in 1st amendment; natl govt cant est natl religion
free exercise clause
2nd clause of 1st amendment; freedom of religion, govt cant interfere
prior restraint
constitutional doctrine; govt cant prohibit speech/publicatiomn b4 the fact. violation of first amendment
clear and present danger test
test by S.C. in case Schenck v. US(1919) to draw line b/e protected and unprotected speech; if words create clear/present danger that there will be substantive evils, congress will prevent
direct incitement test
test by S.C. in case Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) that says govt only punish advocacy of illegal action only if "advocacy is directed to intiice/produce immiment lawless action/protests
symbolic speech
forms of expressions protected as speech
libel/slander
untrue statements, libel is printed; slander is spoken, false, defaming statements
fighting words
words that" by their utterance inflict injury or incite breach of peace"- first amendment
writs of habeous corpus
prove prisoner held lawfully and prisoner allowed free if judge not persuaded by govt's case- these rights imply prisoners have right to know charges against them
ex post facto law
prohibited by constitution; actions committed before law passes, for US is legal bc not a law before
bill of attainder
prohibited by US constitution; legislative punishment w/o judicial action
4th amendment
BOR; protects people from unreasonable searches by fed gov't. it also somewhat what may or may not be searched- warrants by probable cause required
5th amendment
"no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" thus govt restricted w/ respect to rights of ppl. law is -protection of self-incrimination, inditement of grand jury allowed and cannot deny ppl w/o due process
govt cannot take land w/o conpensation
Miranda Rights
statements must be made by police informing a suspect of constitutional rights protected by 5th- ex) lawyer
double jeopardy clause
part of 5th that protects individuals from being tried twice for same offense
exclusionary rule
judicially created rule, prohibits police from using illegally seized evidence at trial
6th amendment
govt guarantees to accused person assistance of court in his defense. rights to speedy/public trial, impartial juries, trials in state where crime committed, notice of charges, right to confront/obtain favorable witnesses, right to counsel
8th amendment
excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted
right to privacy
judicially created principle that individual actions protected by amendments. includes 1,2,4,9,14 amendments
BOR; some areas of life meant to be private,
13th amendment
civil rights amendment, bans slavery
black codes
laws denying most legal rights that newly freed slaves just got; passed by southern states after civil war
14th amendment
civil war amendment; guarantees equal protection/due process of law of all u.s. citizens
15th amendment
enfanchised newly freed slaves, rights for citizens to vote regardless of color, race, creed etc.
jim crow laws
laws by southern states that discriminated against blacks by creating whites only public accomodations
civil rights cases (1883)
five cases under civil rights act of 1875. SC decided that discrimination that state laws enact could not be prohibited by fed govt, private discrimination is allowed
poll tax
obvious
grandfather clause
in southern states where only allow those who grandfathers had voted before reconstruction to vote unless they passed a literacy/wealth test
suffrage movement
drive for voting rights for women
19th amendment
women right to vote
equal protection clause
part of 14th amendment; guarantees all citizens equal protections of law
civil rights act of 1964
wide-ranging legislation passed by congress to outlaw segregation in public facilities/ discrimination in employment. edu, voting. also it created the equal employment opportunity commission
de jure discrimination
racial segregation thats a direct result of a law or official policy
de facto discrimination
racial discrimination that results from practice (ex. housing patterns) rather than law
equal employment opportunity commission
fed agency created to enforce civil rights act of 1964- which forbids discrimination
women's equality amendment
proposed amendment to constitution stating "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by US of state on the account of sex"
suspect classifcation
category/class that triggers highest standard of scrutiny from SC
strict scrutiny
heightened standard of review used by SC to determine the constitutional validity of challenged practice
title IX
provision of educational amendments of 1972 that bars edu institutions recieving fed funds from discriminating against females
affirmative action
policies designed to give special attention/compensatory treatment to members of previously disadvantaged groups
lemon v kurtzman
money from teachers cant go to teachers, 3 rules: 1. secular
2. govt action not affect religion
3. govt action not entangle w religion
lynch v donnelly
reliogus displays ok if for all religiions and for holiday purpose, not religous, not advances the religion
zelman v simmon-harris
money ok for catholic schools if for kids, not other things tho bc of establishment clause
engel v vitale
NY, non demoninationa prayer un constituonal
abingdom v schempp/ murrrary v curtlett
no go on school prayer
Gomillion v. Lightfoot
violated 15th amendment by redistrciting
crawford v marion county
indiana- upheld that id required is ok
wallace v jaffee
moment of silence unconstitutional
westwide v mergens
bible club ok bc social club
lee v weisman
no prayer at graduation, cant make student choose b/e graduation and religion
santa fe v doe
no prayer at hs football games
west virginia v. barnette
kids didnt do pledge bc jehovahs witness
wisconsin v yoder
amish kids dont have to go to h.s.
sherbert v. verner
no work on saturday, bc religion, company still has to pay them. SC protected action for first time
reynolds v us
no pologomy
oregon v smith
no peyote bc drug, even if for religion
lukumi v hialeah
illegal for hialeah to prohibit animal sacrifice
gonzales v o centru
SC ruled can use houscoa
schenk v US
war pamphlets pass-out illegal bc clear/ danger
gitlow v NY
distribute socialist manifesto, also c/p danger upgraded to bad tendency- might cause bad stuff to govt- 14th amendment- selective incorportation- extended to states reverseal of barron v. baltimore, where BOR only federal
brandenburg v ohio
kkk guy said bad things, but not direct incitement
symbolic expression is not as protected as free speech
ok, remember that
tinker v des moines
kids protest nam w black bands, ok bc politcal expression
texas v johnson/ us eichman
burned flag- ok bc political expression, congress mad and made it illegal, guy did it again and SC said again that law illegal and ok to burn the flag
roth/miller
rules, work taken as whole,
1. lewd as whole
2. sexual as a whole
3. not artistic, literary etc as whole
ny times v US (pentagon papers)
stolen papers, us argue cant print bc embaressing and didnt argue if it would be c/p to us
ny times v sullivan
must be false and malcious to be tried
mapp v ohio
looking for fugitive, found porn, illegal bc seach warrant didnt say that
us v leon
this narrows exclusionary rule with the good faith exception; police get a legit warrant but if see something in plain sight, or things you control, its ok; police get more power than individual
miranda v arizona
didnt know he didnt have to talk
gideon v wainwright
petty theif, jailed bc no lawyer, got a lawyer and got free. eventally over time, court made it more and more mandatory for lawyers to be present for convicts
furman v georgia
death penalty unconstituional, more blacks got penalty, arbitrary
greg v georgia
death penalty did not violate equal protection clause, must prove racial discrimation at hand
griswold v conneticut
contraceptions ok bc private and between married people, parent planning
roe v wade
based off griswold v conneticut; abortion to states earlier, but now fed law, legal for first trimester, rules for second, and prohibited in 3rd; SC exceeded constitution authority by writing laws, if decision is overturned, it is based off griswold
substantive due process
look into 5/14 amendment
bowers v hardwick
gay rights ruled illegal
lawrence v texas
overturned hardwick, activity only illegal if gay, thus discriminatory
slaughterhouse case
obliterated 14th amendment, it didnt apply locally, it said blacks not members of states
civil rights cases of 1875 or 83
literacy test/ grandfather clause ok, fed govt cant stop private discrimination
plessy v furgeson
s.c. upheld seperate but equal
sweatt v painter/mclaurin v oklahoma
tex law school unconstitutional, seperate not equal, must integreate bc 14th amendment's equal protection clause
brown v BOE
segregated schools illegal under equal protection clause of 14th amendment, then in 1955 ruled to desegrgate with all deliberate action
regents of cal v bakke
bars quota system, but allows affirmative action, bakke won w. equal protectio clause of 14th amendment
grutter v bollinger
law school, ok for them to consider race bc individual approach
gratz v bolinger
points system unconstituonal bc too mechanic for admissions process