The Legitimacy Of The Provisional Government

Decent Essays
1) Democratic legitimacy. The Provisional Government was basically the reconstituted State Duma - only a few monarchists were arrested, and they were not elected to office by the majority of the Russian people. The Petrograd Soviet, and the composition of the Congress of Soviets - and the later Supreme Soviet - provided the Bolsheviks with a democratic veneer. This veneer they would, in time, lay on top of their imposition of Communist rule across Eastern Europe.
2) Failure to listen. The Provisional Government failed to address the reasons that the Russian people rose up against the Tsar; Russia's involvement in WWI, the land question, hunger in the cities and long hours and low pay - along with poor working and living conditions for Russia's

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Chapter 22 Apush Essay

    • 2882 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Chapter 22 MRQ#1 When and where did communism exercise influence during the twentieth century? Originated from Karl Marx and Marxism; Karl Marx predicted communism to take place in industrial societies, not rural/ peasant areas Represented final stage of development of equality and collective living w/out private property Vietnam was a major struggle; nationalistic, violent roots and communism from ho chi Minh spilled into Laos and Cambodia Fidel Castro led rev. nationalist movement in Latin Am.…

    • 2882 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russia had been lagging behind the rest of Europe when it came to industry and modernity, but they were toward the beginning of the revolutionary movement. When World War I came about, Russians believed the war would be a short one and that they would not need to make use of all of their resources, such as soldiers and supplies. Tsar Nicholas put his faith into a Russian victory for the sake of national unity (EUROPE 165). Against Nicholas’s original beliefs, the war raged on, and peasants in Russia experienced even more unrest. Intellectuals became revolutionaries, and a regime was desired that “would let Russia catch up to the west” (SOURCES 84).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas led Russia into many defeats and his people faced extreme poverty and poor working conditions. During Tsar Nicholas's rule more than half the population was in poverty and war was both unavoidable and unwinnable. Although Tsar Nicholas was not ready to rule it does not mean that the Tsar family was always so…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    , the nobility were beginning to think that they were losing their influence in the economy because the Tsar wanted to do everything himself which lead to his…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The czar got rid of these concessions and kept letting go of the Duma when it came up, contributing to the growing public support for the Bolsheviks and other revolutionary groups. In 1914 Nicholas the 11 led Russia into another war, World War One, that Russia wasn’t prepared to win. As the war went on food became scarce, soldiers became tired and terrible defeats by Germany demonstrated the ineffectiveness of Russia under Nicholas. In March 1917, revolution broke out on the streets of Petrograd (now St. Petersburg) and Nicholas was forced to abdicate his throne later that month.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because of his role in the war as the Supreme Commander, his people began to blame him for the military defeats and also the economic conflicts. This intensified the political disillusionment about Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Thus, Tsar Nicholas’s poor…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The leadership of Tsar Nicholas II and the public perception of the Empress Alexandra was the single greatest cause of the Russian Revolution. Discuss.” These are my research questions and haven't joined them so they flow yet sorry The citizens of Russia were getting restless in their everyday lives, questioning not only their government but getting increasingly frustrated with their situation. On the 12 of March 1917, the president of the Duma (nobility parliament), telegraphed the tsar saying: “The situation is getting worse.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nationalism In Russia

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In1917 Russia a rocky country and not very stable. They were unable to accommodate with Tsar Nicholas II having just been over thrown and were in desperate need of help. The second revolution developed the Marxist Bolsheviks who were a communist party that looked to gain more freedom and justice for themselves. The Russians exhibited many internal problems while trying to establish the country. Russia was also struggling to find a strong political leader and government system that could provide guidance and bring the country together.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Politically changes in attitudes threatened the autocratic rule of Tsar, many had heard of democracy and civil liberties from their appearances in Western Europe, thus leading to the formation of several political parties with various anti-autocratic ideologies, including the Socialist Democratic Party (of which a faction later become the Bolsheviks (Source B). The Bolsheviks in particular played a big role in the revolution and Russia society in the early 20th century, with ideology rooted in socialism and the belief that revolution was the only way to overthrow the tsarist rule, the Bolsheviks spent much of the years prior to the Tsars abdication working to undermine his rule. It is these changes which many historians attribute to reasons for the fall of the dynasty, suggesting that Russian political attitudes were no longer compatible with an autocratic political…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The collapse of the Old Regime could have been avoided if there was a strong leader for Russia. The last Tsar, Nicholas II, was an incapable leader which led to him making a series of mistakes that brought an end to the Old Regime. Nicholas was not a natural leader, which he was aware of, and he decided to avoid any changes and follow his father’s rule. Nicholas was easily persuaded by those advising him and a lot of the time he followed bad advice . However, he was also stubborn and he believed that it was his divine right to rule .…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon, the Tsar lost his power and the empire fell collapsed. The reasons are split by short, medium and long term factors. The mix of cultures in such a large country and the clash of different views and religions were things that had been a long term problem in Russia for a long time. The First World War was the only medium term factor. The War did not create problems but increased them, making each group of people progressively unhappy on how the Tsar ruled.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How far was Rasputin responsible for the collapse of the Tsarist regime? The Tsarist regime collapsed in March 1917 when Nicholas II abdicated. By the time of the abdication the Tsarist regime had already been damaged by a number of factors that could be held responsible for the overall downfall of Tsar Nicholas II. One of these factors is the influence that Rasputin, a monk who convinced the Tsarina that he could cure her son of his haemophilia.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The revolutions in Russia during 1917, particularly the February Revolution, 'grew out of prewar political and economic instability, technological backwardness, and fundamental social divisions, coupled with gross mismanagement of the war effort, continuing military defeats' and the inadequacy of the Tsar and his government. However, whilst it was these factors combined that resulted in the Russian Revolution, the primary factor…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the opinion of George Buchanan, British ambassador to St Petersburg from 1910, “The emperor Nicholas was one of the most pathetic figures in history, he was so unfitted for the role and never really governed Russia.” The industrial revolution throughout russia had just been started at the time of the First World War, this is partly to blame for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Due to late industrialisation, the economy of russia was very weak, leading to there being no way for russia to provide for its people, soldiers and even war supplies. The russian army was even left with ridiculous supplies, many soldiers fighting barefoot and without weapons.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was in this climate that the revolution broke out in the Russian capital and then spread throughout the country. Kerensky 's government lasted a few months , then became unpopular because of having tried to continue the war against the Germans and because they had made no economic reform favorable to the…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays