How Did Tsar Nicholas Follow World War I?

Improved Essays
Internal turmoil of fighting countries boiled to their peaks by the end of World War I. The end of the war left countries left in ruins financially, geographically, and even governmentally. Influential countries, such as Russia, Germany, and Austria-Hungary, experienced change on a much more dramatic level. Revolutions were sparked by ordinary citizens and fueled by the desire to fix what had been done in the government both during and before the war. Russia had been lagging behind the rest of Europe when it came to industry and modernity, but they were toward the beginning of the revolutionary movement. When World War I came about, Russians believed the war would be a short one and that they would not need to make use of all of their resources, such as soldiers and supplies. Tsar Nicholas put his faith into a Russian victory for the sake of national unity (EUROPE 165). Against Nicholas’s original beliefs, the war raged on, and peasants in Russia experienced even more unrest. Intellectuals became revolutionaries, and a regime was desired that “would let Russia catch up to the west” (SOURCES 84). Those against the monarchy touted that they were turning “disorders into a revolution” (EUROPE 168) while they “destroyed the symbols of tsarism and attacked the rich” …show more content…
Russia and Hungary both experienced a revolution consisting of communism. Germany and Austria worked to prevent a communist take over. Germany, Austria and Hungary each had communists in their countries that wanted to model the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Socialists played a big role in the revolutions also. Economies were struggling along with the governments, which made it even harder for those attempting to seize power. Russia lost land in a treaty, and Austria-Hungary lost land by splitting apart. Peasants, minorities, and common citizens in general participated in uprisings and frustration in each

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1) Describe the rule of Czars Alexander III and Nicholas II and the effect on Russian society. Be specific. The rules of Czar Alexander III and Nicholas II were cruel, oppressive, and completely autocratic. Czar Alexander III saw anyone that questioned his authority, spoke a language other than Russian, or did not worship the Russian Orthodox Church to be threat.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The movie depicts the change of identity in Russia and for the Russian people by showing the downfall of the Romanov dynasty. It starts with the beloved Tsar and Tsaritsa ruling over imperial Russia and progresses forward with them becoming less and less popular. This downward shift in popularity is partly because of the close friendship of the Tsaritsa with the drunkard Siberian priest Rasputin. Despite his stated noble intentions to help and serve his Matushka and Batushka his mere presence started to crate rumors and change the identity of his rulers.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    “The Russian Revolution of 1917 as a By-Product of Modernization.” Russian Social Science Review 56:1 (2015): 79-95. This argues for the idea that WWI was not the only reason for revolution. It demonstrates that progress made by the working class and peasants gave them an increased sense of autonomy leading to their push away from autocracy.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Europe, many people thought they were going to win. Germany wanted Liese and this was necessary for Germany advance. France and Belgium were heavily defended and had many forts around. The Fortresses were attacked later and this failed. On August 6th Autria-Hungary declared war on Russia and Serbia declared war on…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II – Leadership and Reign Lions, otherwise known as “King of the Jungle,” walk majestically across their territory observing the animals of their kingdom. Their strength and power make them believe that they are the obvious ruler of those beneath them. Just like lions, Tsar Nicholas II felt that he was the only one capable of ruling his land. He thought that God chose him to be the ruler of Russia, and that all his decisions were correct because God put him there to rule. Tsar Nicholas II's autocratic leadership lead to tragedies and effected the outcome of wars during his reign.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many individuals of the Intelligentsia, as well as the Duma had constructed plans against the Tzar is response. None of which were enacted at this time but the layed the ground work for the cous that came latter. At this time speeches were made against the autocracy in public settings. Those losing power called Nicholas II stupid, others treasonous.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ill-fated by the Khodynka Tragedy, the reign of the last Tsar was plagued with public discontent from his inauguration. Nicholas’ fear that he was “not prepared to be Tsar” caused him to cling to the outdated social and economic rhetoric of his father, Tsar Alexander III, despite the rapidly changing and evolving state of Russia. By 1905, many of the classes, particularly the peasants, urban workers and the reformist middle class were angered and politicized by Nicholas’ reactionary policies. The events of 1905 were preceded by a Progressive and academic agitation for more political democracy and limits to Tsarist rule in Russia. Nicholas II caused grievances for almost every class of people under his protection, to the extent that the gentry…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will first explained Marx and Engel’s ideology and their vision of socialist and communism. Then I will explain how did Russia revolution happened which diverge from Marx and Engel’s blueprints of revolution to socialist. Such as; the spread of socialism, transition from socialism to communism, which people started the revolution, transition of power and how the revolution came about and the difference in life style that people lived in Russia to what Marx and Engel envision. Marx and Engels, wrote that revolution would happened in the most modernize and industrialize countries first. Then it will expand throughout the world, not only in one state.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Russian Revolution: Definition: The Russian Revolution is actually two events in Russia, that took place in 1917. The Revolution took down the Tsar who had controlled Russia since 1440. The Emperor, also called the Tsar, was forced to quit, and a new government was formed.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction World War 1 started in 1914. Majorly, it rose as a result of the Germany determination to emerge a superpower through crippling Russia and France. This war was fought between two major coalitions of nations: the Central Powers and the Allied Powers (Sowards). The Allied Powers were formed to counterpart the aggression Central Powers and Germany. Countries Involved in World War 1 Austria-Hungary After the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife, Austria declared a war against Serbia.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Nicholas didn’t follow through with the October Manifesto which promised to give the parliament more power, it gave the public more reason to distrust him. Nicholas belief in upholding the autocracy, can be seen as a factor which led to the downfall of the Romanov…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Tsarist regime in Russia, under Tsar Nicholas II, survived the 1905 Revolution but not that of February 1917. Several important factors such as the economy, the government and the military, contributed the eventual failure of the autocratic monarchy in Russia. These factors influenced the people of Russia differently in 1905 and 1917. Some factors were not prevalent in the earlier rebellion but increased and changed over the period of eleven years. The way the Tsar dealt with each of these issues had a significant influence over the outcome of the rebellion in February, 1917.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the early nineteenth century, the world was involved in a catastrophic war, World War I. One of the many nations involved was Russia, fighting with the Allies. At the same time, Russia was dealing with an upcoming revolution. This revolution would cause many changes in the structure of Russia. Caused mainly by diverse ethnicities, nationalism, problems in the workforce, and peasant unrest, this revolution would be fought by two sides, the Reds and the Whites. By the 1920s the Russian Revolution would peter out, resulting in a communist government in Russia.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causes of the Russian Revolution: The Russian revolution was the time when the country of russia were very upset about inequality and the bad treatment they were receiving. The leader of Russia, called the czar, was not treating his people nicely. He killed people because of theft religion. He changer the official language to Russian and lead a dishonorable government.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays