Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

Improved Essays
Russia was and still is a vast empire, covering ⅙ of the planet's total surface area. Over a hundred years ago, Russia was ruled by the Tsar, who was the absolute ruler of Russia. At this time Nicholas II was the Tsar of Russia and he did not want anyone to tell him how to rule

To begin with, Tsardom collapsed in February was because Nicholas II was not the “little father” that the russians expected him to be (the big father was referred to God. People expected Nicholas to protect them and care for them if they were in need. His authority and care for the Russians was meant to be like the care of a father in a family but Nicholas fails to show this. This was especially demonstrated during Bloody Sunday in 1905. The day first began with an Okhrana double agent. He was leading a group of workers who were demanding for better working conditions and they went to the winter palace where the Tsar went. Once they arrived, instead of NIcholas to listen to what they were saying, he deployed troops to shoot them which resulted in several causalities. This made people to think of the Tsar as a ruthless and
…show more content…
The Duma was a group of wealthy 3rd class members who wanted to help the Tsar and Russia. They also wanted to help during World War 1 because Russia was losing the war and many soldiers were dying. NIcholas did not answer them and continued governing Russia how he liked. At this point, people knew that the Tsar had very poor political judgement because he often relied on the help of his ministers to guide him. As well as this, the nobility were beginning to think that they were losing their influence in the economy because the Tsar wanted to do everything himself which lead to his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since he was hardly looked after as a child he took part in cruel and unusual things. He wasn’t able to act out with the nobility so he took his frustrations out on innocent animals; he tortured them till death. Ivan always killed and harmed people in various ways like hanging, beatings, and sometimes buried alive.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people think of brutality and ruthlessness when discussing Ivan the Terrible. Although he was cruel and ruthless during his reign, Ivan IV, as he was formally known, did implement some lasting reforms for his country. There were many events, some tragic, in his life that greatly affected him and would ultimately have profound consequences during his reign. Ivan the Terrible was the Grand Prince of Moscow from 1533-1547 and called himself “Tsar of All of the Russians” until his death in 1584. He inherited the title of Grand Prince of Moscow at an early age which greatly affected how he ruled.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miss Pinson English 4 9/19/14 Ivan the Terrible by- Zachary Chadwick Ivan the terrible was one of the most controversial rulers in Russia’s history. There is almost no writings about him that have survived over the years, therefore historians have been forced to go on rumors, diaries, etc. This biography will use this information in order to try and piece together his life from the golden age to the age of terror that he brought on in his later years. Early life-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those against the monarchy touted that they were turning “disorders into a revolution” (EUROPE 168) while they “destroyed the symbols of tsarism and attacked the rich”…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told Nicholas that the country was on the verge of revolution so potentially devastating. Nicholas had two choices, crush the rebellion or give the people civil rights, freedom of speech, and press, Nicholas recoiled at the idea of these democratic reforms. "The heart of the tsar is in the hand of God" Nicholas told his ministers any change would weaken the sacred, mortal power bestowed upon him by the Almighty. "I act in this spirit only because I am certain that it is necessary for Russia". Due to this Nicholas he thought it wasn't wretched that living conditions that had lead to the country's problems, it was the people that had turned against the autocracy and their holy tsar.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Romanov Dynasty Essay

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tsar had ultimate power, they ruled by ‘the divine right of kings’ and thus had ultimate decision over the direction of the country. In considering the fall of the Romanovs and the reasons for such a sudden collapse, it is important to acknowledge the centuries long framework of absolute – and typically highly concentrated – power to the monarchy that was facilitated by the dynastic, autocratic rule of the Romanovs. Almost in a cyclical pattern, the tsars of 19th century Russia implemented positive reform as starts to their reign and concluded with oppressive reversals. This pattern saw continuity throughout the entire reign of the Romanov family; Alexander III relaxed censorship and instated State Councils under the ideas of liberalism yet ended his rule with conservative and reactionary views of post-Napoleonic Europe; Nicholas I saw the Decembrist Revolt as a sign for reform yet fostered the regressive Nicholas System by the end of his time as tsar; Alexander II even, despite the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, military, judicial, and political reform, concluded his reign with oppression in the face of change. In each of these cases, the Romanov leaders shunned change, pushed away the fact that society was evolving to desire freedoms and liberties hitherto absent in the Russian Empire.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Essay

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ivan weakened the power of his own military personnel that he put into place, and this led to financial repercussions as well. His decision to engage in and drag on the Livonian war and his failure to reap success from it resulted in a shortage of Russian resources, as well as a dramatic decrease their economy (Andreyev). Ivan's successor also had an effect on the weakening of Russia's economy. His incompetence brought instability, and Russia's neighbors took advantage of that, causing what we refer to as The Time of Troubles. During this period of time, which was ultimately caused by Ivan the Terrible, Russia nearly fell from power completely ("What Was the Impact of Ivan the Terrible…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Romanov Massacre

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On July 16, 1918, in Yekaterinburg, Russia, Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and his five children, along with his loyal servants, descended downstairs and gathered together for a family photo shoot. However, the family photoshoot turned out to be a deceptive trick created by a communist leader, Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik troops to lure the royal Russian family, the Romanovs, out of hiding and to end Russia’s monarchical rule. Once the Romanovs and their servants made themselves known “...suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire” (“Romanov Family Executed”). Not only did they open fire on the family members but the troops also continued stabbing those who were barely remained…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nicholas II played a vital, negative role in contributing to his complete downfall during the early 20th century. His reluctance to become Tsar was a major factor that contributed to his own demise. The release of the October Manifesto in 1905 was one of the key events that led to the end of Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Tsar Nicholas’s poor leadership in World War 1 as well as his weak-willed personality was also issues that further contributed to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. These factors and events severely influenced the political, social and economic aspects of his ruling .The…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Cossacks rode right into the crowd and slashed with their sabres like madmen. A terrible confusion rose. ”(Source E). The awful events of this day marked a change in Russian attitudes, previously the Russian people had view their Tsar as the ‘little father’ a protector of Russia however now he was seen as ‘Bloody Nicholas’ the man who’s institutionalised brutality and incompetency be it directly or indirectly to the deaths of thousands of innocents, it was this shift in attitudes that gave way to anti-tsarist propaganda from the Bolsheviks and a revitalised interest by the Russian people in changing the way Russia was…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Tsar Summary

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Steven Lee Myers wrote a book titled The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Putin which tells the life of Vladimir Putin. The book gives details about Putin’s experience in the KGB and his movement toward President of Russia. The book starts on the day of November 17 in 1941 with Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin (Putin’s father) on a suicide mission to stop the German army from completely destroying the last Soviet fleet left to defend their nation. The setting was about thirty miles from Leningrad and Putin was to capture a German soldier to interrogate and gather some information from. Putin and some comrades were approaching a building filled with German soldiers and their orders were to infiltrate the building.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peasants made up 80% of the Russian population at the time and although they manly were loyal followers of the Tsar, many supported the Social Revolutionaries as there was a large discontent over land as most of the land was owned by the aristocracy (who made up only 1.5% of the population) and the church. This strained relationship between the Tsar and his people was shown when in 1903 rules on censorship and repressive measures were relaxed, which lead to ‘an explosion of anti-government pamphlets, books and newspapers’ 8 this shows that many people were unhappy with the way the Tsar ruled. An example of the people protesting against the way the Tsar ruled was on Sunday, 22 January 1905, also known as Bloody Sunday. On this day 200,000 protesters who were mainly workers, led by the priest Father Gapon marched to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg with a petition for the Tsar, all carrying pictures of the Tsar to show respect.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then, the military began to not listen to the Czar Nicholas II. Then, political insecurity ensued inside Russia. Vlademir Lenin wanted to “capitalize” the political structure. He wanted to take away the authority from the provisional government and place it with the…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas was charming and intelligent a man who had the welfare of russia at heart. But Nicholas lacked the necessary characteristics for autocratic rule. He was anxious, distrustful of ministers such as Witte and stolypin, who urged reform. his abilities were undermines by his diffidence and irresolution.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    distinguishing itself two distinct classes, namely: The Nobleza, with the King at the helm, was with the aristocracy, the privileged class in Russia. They ran the government, were the largest owners, they enjoyed all their rights and, also, of all privileges. Others showed themselves and insensitive to the needs and sufferings of the people. The people, was made up of professionals, employees, workers and peasants, who cried because they recognize their freedoms and rights, because disappear exploitation, excessive hours of work and low wages; They asked also, a better distribution of land and the prevalence of justice regardless of class. They were the backbone of the Russian Revolution, because thanks to the triumph of this, they could transform a feudal state into a prosperous nation "USSR", eager to universal dominion.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays