The Decision To Drop The Bomb Analysis

Improved Essays
"How will the world use its nuclear capability?" (“The Decision to Drop the Bomb”) is a conflicting question that the world does not know the exact answer to. The American people never imagined the strength and lasting effects of the nuclear bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Most American citizens believe that bombing Japan was the only option at the time. While arguments against and for the bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are substantial and noteworthy, the appalling effects were ethically unjust to the civilians and suggest that American leaders were selfish and racist.
The article, “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” from USHistory.org, examines the “decision of unprecedented gravity” that President Truman faced. The article claims
…show more content…
Morton, like Alperovitz, also comments of the lack of military leaders within the decision and discusses the explanation given by Henry Stimson, who Morton says is “the man who more than any other was responsible for advising the President.” (Morton 334). According to Stimson, once the Manhattan Project began, most US officials assumed the use of atomic weapons if necessary. (Morton 335). While efforts in the Manhattan Project came to an end, the Interim Committee, consisting of various government department heads, suggested to the president that the nuclear bomb should be used against Japan as soon as possible, without prior warning, and in an area where the Japanese military was located. (Morton 337). Planning to shock the Japanese with atomic bombs goes against human rights. Rather than the Japanese military being killed, thousands of civilians died from the bombings. The content within Morton’s article is unbiased and shares the facts that went into the decision to drop the …show more content…
Hersey follows the lives of six survivors and their experiences during and after the bombing. “And now each knows that in the act of survival he lived a dozen lives and saw more death than he ever thought he would see. At the time, none of them knew anything.” (Hersey 2). Through “Hiroshima,” Hersey depicts the devastating effects that the atomic bomb that no American would ever begin to understand. Though the confusion of the Hiroshima people after the bomb had hit can remotely compare to the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001, a different motive of attack is apparent. “Almost all had their heads bowed, looked straight ahead, were silent, and showed no expression whatever.” (Hersey 29). Throughout the novel, a recurrent theme is helping hand the citizens of Japan lend to one another. “One feeling they did seem to share, however, was a curious kind of elated community spirit…” (Hersey 87). Although, the sense of community they acquired was heartwarming, it is a poor excuse for tragedy that happened. “Hiroshima” gives more than enough reason to believe that the decision to drop the bombs was unjust to the innocent civilians of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Author, Herbert Mason stated that, "the bomb cost two billion dollars to develop. How was the administration going to explain to Congress that they developed a weapon that cost two billion dollars and they decided not to use it?"1 How could Truman possibly justify that the greatest mega-weapon ever built wouldn 't be used in this time of need because of morality issues. Instead Americans would have to send thousands of their sons and daughters to an almost inevitable death. However, not only would the cost and casualties from this invasion be a major deciding factor for Truman, but the role that the Soviets would play in the surrender would be…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truman and the Atomic Bomb Tommy Rogers Kilgore College Author Note Tommy Rogers, Government 2305, Kilgore College Questions concerning the information in this paper should go to Tommy Rogers, Government 2305, Kilgore College, 1100 Broadway Blvd, Kilgore, TX 75662 Contact: Rogetomm9920@go.kilgore.edu Abstract In this essay, I will discuss the world altering decision newly-sworn-in President Harry S. Truman had to face and how he had to attack his issue. This essay explains and uses examples of each decision he had to face; deciding whether or not to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. It explains in detail the opinion of those in favor for and those in opposition to the bomb.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    August 1945, President Harry S. Truman made one of the most crucial international security decisions that has shaped how we view nuclear weapons today. The decision to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I will argue that Truman’s made the decision to drop the bomb for keep intact American national interest. According to Walker, J. S., and Alperovitz.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    August 6th, 1945 will be a day never forgotten in history. The atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki will always be connected to Harry S. Truman’s presidency, and is ultimately one of the toughest decisions a president has had to make in United States’ past. Justifying the situation was even more challenging. Having to address the general public after the fact added onto the affair, and will never be an all around positive response to the decision made. There will always be questions beginning with “what if?”…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    justifications of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were by no means rational. The decision to deploy the two bombs was made with little acknowledgment of the thousands of Japanese civilians that would inevitably die as a result. Shortly after the bombs were dropped, Japanese Emperor Hirohito broadcast a speech announcing the nation’s unconditional surrender, and in it, refers to the nuclear weapons as, “a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable…”. The sheer number of civilian deaths and infrastructural damage caused by the bombs was enough to make Japan, a country that was known for its “do-or-die” military style, to ultimately surrender the war. Also, at the time the bombs were dropped, Japan was already in such critical situation that it was apparent they would not be able to keep fighting and would eventually surrender.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the general public opinion, the decision by Trumann to drop the Atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima was unnecessary. It was mainly redundant regarding military standpoint. In fact, the view of the America’s leading generals concerning this decision contradicted with that of the politicians’ viewpoint. Perhaps, it will be important to consider that these generals raised their concerns before as well as after the bombing. Among these individuals were the Supreme Commander in charge of the Allied Forces in the Western part of Europe and General Eisenhower.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 16, 1945, Truman received news that the first ever atomic bomb was ready to be tested. This weapon was by no means just an experiment meant to store away and have in the event that conflict broke out and the US needed an effective way to protect itself from the offenders. The creation behind this weapon was solely to force Japan to surrender and allow the end of World War II. However, using it had been questionable ever since its initial creation, and especially after it had been tested for effectiveness. A weapon as powerful as the atomic bomb would cause a vast amount of death and destruction, the morality of using it was constantly questioned in different aspects.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Truman summarized; ‘we shall completely destroy Japan's power to make war.’ Therefore, dropping the atomic bomb is justified when considering the USA’s traditional realist policy of total victory. Utilizing the bomb proved to be the best decision for an America striving for…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki stand as the worst atrocities ever committed in the history of warfare. The United States committed the most terrible mistake in its history, that they could not foresee all these catastrophic consequences and radiation of the atomic bomb. Only after this historical event, people gained a knowledge about the atomic weapon itself and about its horrifying impact on the life. Albert Einstein said that ‘‘I know with what kind of weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones.’’ Despite Truman said that the target will be a purely military one and he will warn the Japanese asking them to surrender, the reality was that women, children and just innocent people became the target…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “ The fact that we can release atomic energy ushers in a new era in man’s understanding of nature’s forces.” This statement above was by President Harry S. Truman and was featured in his official White House press release for the Hiroshima bombings on the 6th of August 1945. The heart of this statement poses countless questions about the nature of the bombings; as did the justification for bombing a non-military city bring a means to an end or an end to the means. There are lingering questions surrounding the ethics of atomic and nuclear weapons, asking whether the United States truly had justifiable reasons for Hiroshima. Although it ended the physical warfare of the Second World War, the United States had no true ethical justification for the Hiroshima bombings of 1945, primarily due to the fact that these bombings were militarily…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Seventy-two years ago, for the first time people had witnessed one of the largest atomic destructions ever recorded in history when “shock and blast waves rippled over the city, punched the innards of buildings and homes, and bore the detritus on the nuclear wind”- everything immediately turned into dusk after America dropped the Little Boy on Hiroshima and the Fat Man on Nagasaki (Ham 317). To the civilians who saw the bombing of the two cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they would never be able to come back to their normal lives. It was a shock, a fear and a scar in the heart and the soul that can never be cured. There are several perspectives and ongoing debates on this topic since both countries have their own evidence to back up for their…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During World War 2 in 1945,the president of the United States, Harry S. Truman decided to use two atomic bombs against Japan in Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. This decision has been a constant argument around the world. What it is clear is that whether or not this was the right decision, this colossal war ended. Launching the atomic bombs towards Japan was the best decision for the benefit of both countries, even if it doesn’t look like it, It prevented larger tragedies. The bomb prevented more deaths for Japan and US, the war could have lasted much longer bringing other consequences, and the Japanese were warned before the…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 are encased in one of the most controversial presidential decisions of America’s history. The war on the European front was coming to an end, but Japan still held a firm fighting position against the Allied Powers. With each Japanese island the U.S. Army seized control of, American casualties increased evermore. The next phase of crippling Japan’s fighting power was to invade the southern island of Kyushu, and eventually the main island of Honshu – islands twice, and three times the size of the preceding islands. Due to the increasing amount of casualties each island demonstrated, alternative options had to be discussed before proceeding with one of the most costly invasions America would undertake.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate over whether President Truman should have dropped the atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki has occurred over decades. There are many people who the favor other options to dropping the bomb, because they feel as if the thousands of innocent Japanese citizens who lost their lives could have been spared. They believe dropping the bombs were not necessary to winning the war. However, this researcher has come to the conclusion that, though this incident was tragic, nuclear warfare was the best decision in the end.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays