In America, there are a minute number of fertility drugs that can assist a woman to conceive a child, however, infertility is a growing issue. A fertility drug comparable to Swenson’s could be world renowned or it could be a nightmare. It would be world renowned if there were certain regulations on it. However, without regulations, the fertility drug would be a catastrophe. A fertility drug that allows a woman to always be able to conceive would help an abounding amount of couples. In brief, this drug would have minor setbacks yet with the right procedures and regulations it could be a phenomenon. A misfortune of a fertility drug such as Swenson’s is it could have the consequence of an increase of birth defects. An eminently controlled experiment
…show more content…
Families might have eight plus children only for the benefits of welfare. Our class had an elongated discussion about a woman named Natalie Suleman. She is prominently known as “Octomom”. Octomom was famous for giving birth to eight children at one time. It was later discovered that her doctor and she schemed the eight child pregnancy. Octomom was eventually sued for welfare fraud; so many might say her fame ended quickly. Octomom was only one example of what could happen with a fertility drug comparable to Swenson’s.In 2000, 2,738,475 families were on public assistance in the United States. This number, in 2012, increased dramatically to 3,341,535 families. If the numbers are already increasing without a fertility drug related to Swenson’s, then her drug being introduced would not generate too colossal of a deal. Wistfully, individuals will abuse the system with or without drugs like Swenson’s. Nevertheless, if a drug comparable to Swenson’s should be acquired if it became possible, for the sake of the couples in need of a …show more content…
If the drugs were unethical then they would not be available to women in America. In the book, Swenson’s method of obtaining the drug was unethical. If the drug was tested the right way, for example, with clinical trials, then the drug would be completely ethical. One preeminent issue was that the fertility drug would cause addiction for the rest of the woman 's life. On the other hand, if the couple truly desired a child, they could attend therapy and addiction therapy sessions. The key point is that the couple would have a child. Most of the fertility treatments that woman can have are painful. That is unethical; for a woman to conceive, she has to go through pain. Swenson’s fertility drug would be painless and guaranteed conception. The way that a drug is found should not determine if it can be used or not. To summarize, a fertility drug that causes addiction for a lifetime, but aides in conception are ethical. Addictions can be fixed, but infertility cannot be fixed so
Families might have eight plus children only for the benefits of welfare. Our class had an elongated discussion about a woman named Natalie Suleman. She is prominently known as “Octomom”. Octomom was famous for giving birth to eight children at one time. It was later discovered that her doctor and she schemed the eight child pregnancy. Octomom was eventually sued for welfare fraud; so many might say her fame ended quickly. Octomom was only one example of what could happen with a fertility drug comparable to Swenson’s.In 2000, 2,738,475 families were on public assistance in the United States. This number, in 2012, increased dramatically to 3,341,535 families. If the numbers are already increasing without a fertility drug related to Swenson’s, then her drug being introduced would not generate too colossal of a deal. Wistfully, individuals will abuse the system with or without drugs like Swenson’s. Nevertheless, if a drug comparable to Swenson’s should be acquired if it became possible, for the sake of the couples in need of a …show more content…
If the drugs were unethical then they would not be available to women in America. In the book, Swenson’s method of obtaining the drug was unethical. If the drug was tested the right way, for example, with clinical trials, then the drug would be completely ethical. One preeminent issue was that the fertility drug would cause addiction for the rest of the woman 's life. On the other hand, if the couple truly desired a child, they could attend therapy and addiction therapy sessions. The key point is that the couple would have a child. Most of the fertility treatments that woman can have are painful. That is unethical; for a woman to conceive, she has to go through pain. Swenson’s fertility drug would be painless and guaranteed conception. The way that a drug is found should not determine if it can be used or not. To summarize, a fertility drug that causes addiction for a lifetime, but aides in conception are ethical. Addictions can be fixed, but infertility cannot be fixed so