Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Mandatory Minimum Sentences are over exaggerated and harsh sentences criminals have to follow while they are in jail. This all started to prevent and stop crime for possession of any and all drug possession. Although mandatory minimum sentences stop crime and arrest criminals, it actually puts innocent who don’t deserve such harsh sentences in jail for unwarranted amounts of time. When mandatory minimum sentences began, the goal was to stop drug addicts who were violent, but it only affects harmless people who don’t deserve it. “Members of Congress, federal judges… found them too severe, unjust… ineffective at preventing narcotics use.” (Schlosser, 2) The author of his article explains that punishing people isn’t always the solution for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The illusion of death row inmates fitting a cookie cutter description is not true. Inmates on death row come from various socio-economic backgrounds and careers. Not all death row inmates are guilty. In 2004, the state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for allegedly setting his home on fire, killing his three daughters. However, it was the work of the Innocence Project (Garland, September, 13, 2010) proving the forensic and informant attested in court was invalid and just not true; hence, an innocent man was executed.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harsh minimum sentencing practices around drug offences exist because of the Reagan administration’s rhetoric that blamed drugs as the primary cause of violent crime in the US during the 1980s. Prior to Reagan’s “War on Drugs” era, drug crime in the US was relatively minor, however, beginning in 1980, the number of prisoners in jail for drug related offences skyrocketed. While there were just 41,100 of these prisoners in 1980, by 2010 that number had tripled, an increase of 1,100%. One of the biggest reasons for this seemingly outrageous increase is mandatory minimums, a system devised to enact harsher sentences for first time offenders, with the goal of making them reluctant to commit the same crime again. In her book, The New Jim Crow, professor…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence “at the most intense levels of drug use, drugs and crime are directly and highly correlated and serious drug use can amplify and perpetuate preexisting criminal activity”. Taking this into consideration, it is not hard to understand why so many people are in support of more severe sentences in response to drug related crimes. While the effectiveness of the use of mandatory minimums to reduce drug related crimes is questionable, supporters of mandatory minimums make some compelling arguments that apply to all mandatory minimums not just those set on drug…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines: Mandatory minimum sentence refers to the fixed sentence of a crime that a judge is forced to deliver. In 1986, Congress enacted mandatory minimum sentencing laws. This was to impose the mandatory minimum sentence that a person would receive for the offense committed. A mandatory minimum sentencing guideline requires for a judge to hand down sentences for a certain amount of time. For certain crimes, there are criminal sentencing guidelines, this gives the judges a certain discretion to make sure that the crime fits the punishment and that the offender severe that punishment no matter elements may exist.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second policy initiative that this memorandum proposes to positively impact mass incarceration is ASC (A Second Chance) which deals with reentry. Fiscal savings from the sentencing aspects of the New Orleans plan will be invested in programs to lower recidivism and help convicts get back on their feet. In the state of Louisiana, convicts will be eligible for welfare programs and student loans, encouraging ex-cons to pursue a college education will be a priority for entry and welfare programs are necessary to help convicts stay off the street. Public housing laws that allow discrimination will be abolished and reformed so that prisons will stop being the main housing program for the urban poor and homeless convicts will stop reverting to…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over half of the prisoners in the federal system are incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenses because of mandatory minimum sentencing. (NeSmith, 2015). Not only do they have damaging repercussions mentally but they also negatively affect the families of those punished by minimum sentencing. Because judges were unsure and untrained on how to use their discretion there was little to no appellate review on sentencing.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mass incarceration is a term used to describe the increase in the number of incarcerated people in the United States over the past forty years. The number of people getting put in prison in the United States started to increase since the beginning of War on Drugs in 1982. “US is home to 5% of the world’s population and 25% of the world's prisoners”, states the documentary 13th. There are currently more people in jail for a drug offense than the number of people in jail in 1980. The number of people incarcerated went from 40,900 in 1980 to 469,545 in 2015.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One can see, while created with good intentions, mandatory minimums have proven only to hurt rather than help. Mandatory minimums have been around in some fashion throughout history. Death or banishment were the typical punishments unless the offender was pardoned (Doyle, 2013). During the very first congress, a series of mandatory minimums were…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently, news emerged that John Horner, a father of three, received the minimum sentence of 25 years in prison for illegally selling $1,800 worth of painkillers to a friend. This is an example of how minimum sentencing causes people to be punished disproportionately to their crimes. Aristotle would call this an inequity our justice system. He defines equity as a “rectification of the law where the law falls short by reason of its universality.”…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    prison system are the mandatory minimums. Mandatory minimums are bad. Because mandatory minimums are the lowest sentence someone can get. For example if someone were to get caught with illegal drugs the mandatory minimum would be a 15 to 30 year sentence. In “The School To Prison Pipeline”(ACLU), the author states that most students will go to prison or jail for 5 to 10 years after getting suspended multiple times.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mary Price, a lawyer for an advocacy group against mandatory minimums: “Over the past several years, the tone of the discussion about incarceration has changed dramatically. We have come to the realization that our punitive approach to drug crimes is not working and has produced significant injustices” (qtd in Horwitz). Changing America’s approach to crime, specifically drug crimes, and incarceration would allow the country to reduce spending, and overcrowding in prisons. Changing the way nonviolent drug crimes are charged and sentenced would also help reduce overcrowding, and make room for people who committed violent crimes.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass incarceration is ideally a part of American history. The increasing number of the prison population is alarming contrasting to the decrease of crime in the United States. The Caging of America depicts the relationship between mass incarceration and racism and mass incarceration and the crime rate. Gopnik shows that during the period of which incarceration rates were going up in the entire country, the crime rate was dropping, particularly in New York, therefore showing the cause of the crime fall had no linkage with prison over population. Gopnik sheds light to high rates of incarceration and the fact that incarceration should not be a method of crime control.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Policies enacted in this movement include mandatory minimum sentencing laws like three strikes and truth-in-sentencing. Three strikes laws take away judicial discretion, giving more sentencing power to the prosecutor because they decide what to charge the defendant with. Mandatory minimums often require life sentences for many offenders who are nonviolent and non-serious. These include many drug offenders, where a life sentence will take away any chance they have of getting better. Our current system doesn’t offer any help with addiction; the real reason why many are…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays