The Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing

A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there …show more content…
This law allows for judges to give out harsher sentences to criminals, the only down side to this would have to be the fact that this provision has increased the prison overcrowding. In closing, the sentencing guidelines were designed to aide with the tremendous work that is brought on in the criminal justice division, but this has caused for problems in that it does provide for a more consistent and uniform sentencing process for allowing prison resources such as, reducing punishment but it also gives way to unbalanced justice in the cases pertaining to drugs and offenses for drug usage. The fact of the matter is that sentencing guidelines are helpful with certain respects in handling case matter, like reducing punishment for certain groups of crimes and offenders alike, they aide in enhancing judicial accountability and the most important of overcrowding within the prison