Consensus Model Vs Conflict Model

Improved Essays
There are two major models of the criminal justice system, the Consensus Model

and Conflict Model. The Consensus Model of Criminal Justice is “a criminal justice

Perspective that assumes that each of the component Parts of the criminal

Justice system strives toward a common goal and that the movement of cases and people

Through the system is smooth due to cooperation between the various Components of the

System that the components work together hand in hand to achieve the social outcome we

call justice. On the other hand the Conflict Model provides another approach to the study

Of American criminal justice. The conflict model says that the interests of criminal

Justice agencies tend to make actors within the system self-serving.
…show more content…
While decision making is as much about conflict as it is about

Agreement, structure Consensus works best in an atmosphere in which conflict is

Encouraged, supported, and resolved cooperatively with respect, nonviolence, and

Creativity. Conflict is desirable. It is not something to be avoided, dismissed, diminished,

Or denied According to This logical structure, justice is more a result of Conflicts among

Agencies within the System than it is the result of team work among Component

Agencies. And even though these two models have distinct origins both of these models

Or beliefs are evident in every day of our society.

In my Perspective the both consensus and conflict theories ultimately exist to

Promote consensus the main problem is what kind and under what Terms. An example

Of the conflict model is police persuading of innocent people into confessing to crimes in

Order to achieve higher clearance rates which are the number of cases police resolve.

And even though we want to believe that our criminal justice system works based on

Conflict model that exists in reality but would prefer consensus, I would love to see

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The justice approach stems from the Aristotelian philosophy where it is stated that “equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally”. The justice model of ethical decision-making can be described as “moral obligation to act on the basis of fair adjudication between competing claims. Hence, when making the decision, the individual should assess how fair the action will be and if it could potentially discriminate and show favouritism. Discrimination by definition “imposes burden on people who are no different from those on whom burden are not imposed”. Favouritism, on the other hand, provides benefits to a certain group of people, without a justifiable reason.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nils Christie Case Study

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nils Christie is trying to implement the notions of perceiving conflicts as a property and the multiple fashions by which it has impacted the victims and accused within the legal system. One may agree with Christie’s indication of conflicts as property but to a certain extent. Furthermore the acuity of his insight is debatable and will be analyzed throughout this paper. Utilizing example of violent crimes within Canada; it will distinguish the strong and weak points of Christie’s argument. Lastly, the means of which experts within the judicial system can be recognized as “professional thieves” will further confirm the theory of conflict as property to another degree.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun control is one of many contemporary social problems that has created a lot of controversy and disagreement between a variety of groups in the United States. Underlying this issue as well as others is the Conflict Theory, one of the few traditions highlighted by Randall Collins in his book, Four Sociological Traditions. Disagreements can arise from individual beliefs that end up opposing one another, and once these conflicts reach their tipping point, one side become alienated, and change begins to be fought for. In the present day, there is so much disagreement that it makes the Conflict Theory one of the most relevant traditions for explaining and understanding society as it currently is due to the constant disagreements between people.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Imagine a man that always donate clothes and feeds the homeless. This man regularly visits children with terminal illnesses and is one of the largest donors to Susan G. Komen for the Cure non-profit organization. He is viewed by tens of thousands as a saint, heaven sent or a reincarnation of Jesus himself. A just man in the eyes of many, but this man has twisted dark secrets; which involve human trafficking, murder of any competitor and extortion of politicians. The man is an unjust person by nature but is viewed as just.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sports law is relevant to the administration of sports and a person’s participation in sport whether they play at amateur, professional or international level. The legal issues that arise from a sporting activity can involve aspects of contract law, torts, anti-discrimination, trade practice and criminal law The most common procedure involves breaches of the rules of the game that are contrary to the principles of the game that are seen as being against the morals of sportsmanship. From this point this is able to be dealt with by the governing bodies through possibly being sent to a tribunal and then Governing bodies Most commonly it can be seen that parliament does not make law regarding sports as a result they leave the decision to…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Conflict as Property Nils Christie explains that he believes that society has created a system in which the conflict has been taken away from the parties involved. He used the Tanzanian and the Scandinavian court systems as examples. In the Tanzanian system the parties involved were in the centre, the friends and relatives there took part but did not take over and the judges were extremely inactive. While in the Scandinavian system the courts were not the central element in the daily life of the citizens and it was outside of the territories of ordinary people. The parties do not speak for themselves instead they are represented and the judges are very active in the proceedings.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Parricide

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To be convinced of something takes little effort but to convince someone it takes a great deal of effort. There are more than one way to craft an argument. Whether it be through statistics, persuasion, feelings, they all have a goal, to make the audience listen and believe what one has to say. On the topic of the justice system and parricide I have found three articles who portray similar arguments, but craft them in different ways. But whether it be extrinsic or even touching on intrinsic they are successful in creating a strong argument towards their claims.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Bryan Stevenson’s memoir, he explains how “the power of mercy…belongs to the undeserving. It’s when mercy is least expected that it’s most potent – strong enough to break the cycle of victimization and victimhood, retribution and suffering” (294). However, Stevenson isn’t just talking about mercy. Mercy plays a part with other prominent aspects of the book, most relating to problems in the justice system. These faults are what led Walter McMillian being put on death row for a crime he did not commit, which is the main storyline of the memoir.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A frame is a fully developed social construction template that allows its users to categorize, label, and deal with a wide range of world events. Frames simplify one’s dealing with the world by organizing experiences and events into groups and guiding what are seen as the appropriate policies and actions. ”(37,38) The 3 crimes and justice frames I am going to describe and discuss are the Faulty Criminal Justice Frame, Blocked Opportunities Frame and Social Breakdown Frame.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many parts of the criminal justice system have been set up to seek justice for families and victims whom have been negatively impacted by crime. The criminal justice system seeks to find and fairly punish criminals for the crimes that they have committed. The system however, while having many good factors, also has some negative ones. There are problems within the police force, the court system, prison and jail, and the rehabilitation process. Movies and television shows can lead to people having a misconception of the truth of the criminal justice system.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a term that people use to describe as an act or behavior that represents the good people present to others and themselves. It serves as a moral high ground that people strive to be, although sometimes these thoughts can be twisted into its opposite and cause pain, anger, and other negative emotions and acts arise within people. This pain erupts into what is known as injustice and is the epitome of what people should not strive for due it bringing so much negativity. It is a moral choice that no one what’s to make due to the label that it puts on them making them into monsters in the eyes of others due to what they believe could have been done. Although, in some cases, injustice is sometimes the best choice in the matter if one is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Module 4: Levine, King, Rogers Rachel King Aspen University: N491 September 5, 2017 King’s Conceptual System Imogene King’s conceptual system theory involving goals focuses on the patient to client interaction during the care relationship. The nurse’s primary function is to establish, maintain and achieve health to the patient under their immediate actions. The nurse is successful on regaining the patients’ health by following a framework and guideline of assessing the patient, interacting with the patient and by setting goals that involves the patient within a social group. King, also expressed, that human beings have basic functions and assumptions that are described as systems which are in constant interaction with their environment…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Silence: The court is in session is written one of the finest works which represents our Indian Patriarchal society. This work was a rebel against the established values of fundamentally orthodox Indian society. This drama also represents the metaphorical trial between humanists and anti-humanists. And it has been one of the controversial topics which inequality in the society, it also tells us that we human beings are part of the society’s court in some part of our life.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays