• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

What are the 4 legal theories under which X may bring a claim against L?

1. Negligence (most common)



2. Fraud/Misrepresentation



3. Breach of Contract



4. Breach of Fiduciary Duty

What are the 4 elements of a malpractice suit based in negligence?

1. Duty



2. Breach



3. Causation



4. Damages

What is the most important question to ask when dealing with a malpractice claim based on negligence?

Did X receive competent representation?



YES --> NO BASIS for malpractice claim



What is the general standard of care L owes his X's?

The skill, thoroughness, diligence & knowledge possessed by general practitioners of ordinary skill, experience & capacity who perform similar services in the community



When does L's responsibility to exercise reasonable care in representing X begin?

When it's reasonable for X to rely on L to provide professional advice/perform an act for X



(doesn't matter if the X-L relationship has expressly or formally been created)

When does L's duty of competent representation extend to persons other than X?

injured 3rd party may have a claim under the general principles of privity



OR



injured 3rd party is the intended beneficiary of L's acts

Why is it so difficult to prove the causal relationship between L's negligence & X's injury ?

Because X has to prove two cases:



1. That L was negligent; AND



2. The outcome would have been different & more advantageous to X

If L is subject to discipline for violating the Model Rules, is he also necessarily liable for malpractice?

Not necessarily



L can be liable for malpractice w/o being subject to discipline

When may L contract with X to limit L's prospective liability for malpractice?

ONLY if X is represented by independent counsel in making the agreement

What is the difference between an agreement by X to limit L's liability for malpractice & an agreement by X to settle an existing claim for malpractice?

Limiting Liability: Valid only if X is independently represented in making the agreement



Settling Claim: Valid if L advises X in writing that independent representation is appropriate (but NOT required)