• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
subjective
definitions vary between countries and even within cultures - no set definition. are you poor if you have a large mortgage, owing a lot of money? or are you poor if you can't afford a car?
absolute definition
ROWNTREE basic needs. weekly cost. poverty line. if below poor. primary and secondary. - diff shops - nutritious

- what is a basic need? - ignores soc needs - destitution - hides extent of relative poverty.
relative definition
TOWNSEND. social survey large geog rep. deprivation index. 4+ = poor. warm waterproof coat, use of shower, weekly sunday joint, cooked breakfast everyday. - veg - subjective - choose

- inequality not poverty - diff countries diff norms - inflate never disappear in C
multiple (consensual)
MACK AND LANSLEY list household items volunteers rank order of imp. socio not decide so consensual. those lacking number of most imp items due to money exp multiple dep

- still subject to bias > social desirability - not operationalized
social exclusion
inab to fully participate in soc because of low income unemployment bad housing bad neighbourhoods.

SEU: new labour monitor redue amount social exclusion in uk. never put figure on number of people - looks at indiv idicators ie number unemployed, homeless, teen preg.
millennium survey
Bristol uni researchers. measure extent both poverty and social exclusion. three mil adults and 400,000 kids underfed in uk. nine mil poor housing. 10m adults 1m children no leisure activities. believe govt should do more to help poor.
probs of using official stats
no overall figures given
cant look at changes in peoples lives
sample could change every year effecting amount poverty found
Marxist: govt only publish positive findings
OS on wealth hard to obtain - values > unreliable (ie Times Rich list)