• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Charles' personality
- had shown himself to be untrustworthy since Petition of Right in 1628
- escape from army custody on 11th November 1648
- inflexibile and refused to accommodate other views
- godly Puritan zeal was not inherently anti-monarchical
- drove social and political conservatives to develop revolutionary attitudes
- often went back on his words
- Engagement with the Scots showed his duplicity
- rejection of Heads of the Proposals meant that freedom of religious conscience and secure parliamentary power could not be achieved with Charles in the mix
- could not make a "mathematical security" (Rudyerd)
Army influence
- Prayer meeting in Windsor in April suggested that God's anger was caused by negotiations with the King: "our duty, to call Charles Stuart, that man of blood, to account"
- after Pride's Purge, the army had the power to enforce its will by military means
- polarised and politicised
- a settlement with Charles would abandon all the army had fought for in the Civil Wars
- soldiers witnessed the bloodshed firsthand: Cromwell could not believe the recklessness with which Charles had launched the country into another bout of civil war
- the Remonstrance and army regiments demanded an end to negotiations with Charles, and capital punishment for a "war criminal"
- hardened attitudes, i.e. court-martialling after sieges in Pembroke and Gloucester
- army was unwilling to disband until until it had created a world fit for its heroes to live in
'Eye for an eye'
- Ireton's Remonstrance demands the trial of the King
- Charles blamed for blood spilt and atrocities committed in the civil wars
- Old Testament: "for blood it defileth the land, and that land cannot be cleansed of that blood that is shed therein but by the blood of him that shed it"
- must be killed
Religion
- Charles was seen as hoing against God's judgment by leading the country into war again
- "a man against whom God hath witnessed"
- milinarianism: widespread belief in providence, evident in Cromwell's letters after battles ("the work of God")
- radical political and religious thinking created preconditions for the execution
- many, including Ireton and Cromwell, believed Charles' death was necessary for God's forgiveness
Lack of viable alternatives
- Morrill: "by Jan 1648 there were two alternatives: capitulation to or decapitation of the monarch"
- if he was imprisoned, he would become a focus for Royalist uprisings
- Charles was unwilling to accept abdicational exile