• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Define autotrophy, and describe how energy and nutrients are gained by autotrophs.
Autotroph "Self Feeders": An organism that converts energy from sunlight or from inorganic chemical compounds in the environment into chemical energy stored in the carbon-carbon bonds of organic compounds.

-For example, photosynthetic and chemosynthetic organisms. We are mostly interested in photosynthetic organisms.

-Moss, trees, coral reefs, macroalga, ferns esc.
Define heterotrophy, and describe how energy and nutrients are gained by the main categories of heterotrophic organisms
-Heterotrophs "Different Feeders": An organism that obtains energy by consuming energy-rich organic compounds from other organisms.

-We are mainly concerned with chemoheterotrophic forms (consuming energy in the form of biomass).

-Heterotrophs acquire energy from either plants (monkeys eat coconuts), consumers of plants (humans eat cows that eat straw) or waste products (dung beetle cleans up poop).
Explain the concept of optimality, using the terminology of evolutionary adaptation.
-Optimality results when fitness is maximized.

-Optimal Foraging Theory proposes that animals will maximize the amount of energy acquired per unit time, energy and risk involved in finding food.

-Optimal Foraging theory relies on the assumption that evolution acts on the behaviour of animals to maximize their energy gain.
Differentiate the optimization pathways of energy-maximization, time-minimization and risk-minimization, in the context of competing demands on prey and on consumers.
-Energy-maximization: Selection favours the individuals gathering the richest resources (energy and nutrient content) and/or the largest possible amounts of resources.

-Time-minimization: Selection favours the individuals able to collet their resource requirements in the shortest period of time.

-Risk-minimization: Selection favours the individuals that avoid exposing themselves to unnecessary risks.

-These optimization categories are not independent of each other. They may all occur at the same time.
Explain predicted patch use by foragers in heterogeneous habitats
-The Marginal Value Theorem assumes that a foraging animal will encounter food patches of varying densities. The time the animal spends in a patch should optimize its rate of energy gain per amount of time spent foraging.

-This can be determined by drawing the cumulative energy gained versus time including travel time

-Add the cost of travel information curve - which runs tangent to the cumulative curve

-The intersection point is the threshold point at which the worth of the patch becomes marginal to the forager.
Explain why the predictions of the marginal value theorem may not be true in real world cases.
-In real habitats, patches are never consistent!

-Patch spacing will be both variable and changeable

-Abiotic factors may prevents using a patch fully

-Competitors may have an impact on a patch using forager - it may give up sooner than the patch qualities would predict.
Interpret comparative data concerning the evolutionary impact of predation on both predator and prey populations in terms of specialization and frequency dependence.
-The stronger the pressure applied by a given predator, the stronger the response-diversity shown by the prey.

-This particular pattern of natural selection is referred to as frequency-dependent selection: the outcomes for a genotype are determined primarily by its relative abundance in the population rather than its other characteristics.
Interpret comparative data concerning the evolutionary impact of predation on both predator and prey populations in terms of specialization and frequency dependence.
-The stronger the pressure applied by a given predator, the stronger the response-diversity shown by the prey.

-This particular pattern of natural selection is referred to as frequency-dependent selection: the outcomes for a genotype are determined primarily by its relative abundance in the population rather than its other characteristics.