Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
8 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Define autotrophy, and describe how energy and nutrients are gained by autotrophs.
|
Autotroph "Self Feeders": An organism that converts energy from sunlight or from inorganic chemical compounds in the environment into chemical energy stored in the carbon-carbon bonds of organic compounds.
-For example, photosynthetic and chemosynthetic organisms. We are mostly interested in photosynthetic organisms. -Moss, trees, coral reefs, macroalga, ferns esc. |
|
Define heterotrophy, and describe how energy and nutrients are gained by the main categories of heterotrophic organisms
|
-Heterotrophs "Different Feeders": An organism that obtains energy by consuming energy-rich organic compounds from other organisms.
-We are mainly concerned with chemoheterotrophic forms (consuming energy in the form of biomass). -Heterotrophs acquire energy from either plants (monkeys eat coconuts), consumers of plants (humans eat cows that eat straw) or waste products (dung beetle cleans up poop). |
|
Explain the concept of optimality, using the terminology of evolutionary adaptation.
|
-Optimality results when fitness is maximized.
-Optimal Foraging Theory proposes that animals will maximize the amount of energy acquired per unit time, energy and risk involved in finding food. -Optimal Foraging theory relies on the assumption that evolution acts on the behaviour of animals to maximize their energy gain. |
|
Differentiate the optimization pathways of energy-maximization, time-minimization and risk-minimization, in the context of competing demands on prey and on consumers.
|
-Energy-maximization: Selection favours the individuals gathering the richest resources (energy and nutrient content) and/or the largest possible amounts of resources.
-Time-minimization: Selection favours the individuals able to collet their resource requirements in the shortest period of time. -Risk-minimization: Selection favours the individuals that avoid exposing themselves to unnecessary risks. -These optimization categories are not independent of each other. They may all occur at the same time. |
|
Explain predicted patch use by foragers in heterogeneous habitats
|
-The Marginal Value Theorem assumes that a foraging animal will encounter food patches of varying densities. The time the animal spends in a patch should optimize its rate of energy gain per amount of time spent foraging.
-This can be determined by drawing the cumulative energy gained versus time including travel time -Add the cost of travel information curve - which runs tangent to the cumulative curve -The intersection point is the threshold point at which the worth of the patch becomes marginal to the forager. |
|
Explain why the predictions of the marginal value theorem may not be true in real world cases.
|
-In real habitats, patches are never consistent!
-Patch spacing will be both variable and changeable -Abiotic factors may prevents using a patch fully -Competitors may have an impact on a patch using forager - it may give up sooner than the patch qualities would predict. |
|
Interpret comparative data concerning the evolutionary impact of predation on both predator and prey populations in terms of specialization and frequency dependence.
|
-The stronger the pressure applied by a given predator, the stronger the response-diversity shown by the prey.
-This particular pattern of natural selection is referred to as frequency-dependent selection: the outcomes for a genotype are determined primarily by its relative abundance in the population rather than its other characteristics. |
|
Interpret comparative data concerning the evolutionary impact of predation on both predator and prey populations in terms of specialization and frequency dependence.
|
-The stronger the pressure applied by a given predator, the stronger the response-diversity shown by the prey.
-This particular pattern of natural selection is referred to as frequency-dependent selection: the outcomes for a genotype are determined primarily by its relative abundance in the population rather than its other characteristics. |