• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/67

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

67 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Observational study that collects data from a group of people to assess a frequency of disease, at a particular point of time

Cross-sectional study

Can show disease prevalence, risk factor association with disease but noes not establish causality

Cross-sectional study

Observational and retrospective study that compares group of people with disease to a group without disease

Case-control study

Looks for prior exposure or risk factor, use Odds ratio (OR)

Case-control study

Compares a group with a given exposure or risk factor to a group without such exposure

Cohort study

Study that can be observational and prospective or retrospective

Cohort study

Looks to see if exposure or risk factor increase the likelihood of disease, use relative risk (RR)

Cohort study

Compares the frequency with which both monozygotic twins or both dizygotic twins develop same disease

Twin concordance study

Measure heritability and influence of environmental factors (nature vs nurture)

Twin concordance study

Compares siblings raised by biological vs adoptive parents

Adoption study

Experimental study involving humans, compares therapeutic benefits of 2 or more treatment, or of treatment and placebo

Clinical trial

Clinical trial study improves quality when study is

Randomized


Controlled


Double blinded

Drugs trial Phase I

Small number of healthy volunteers


Purpose (is it safe)

Drugs trial Phase II

Small number of patients with disease of interest


Purpose (does it work)

Drugs trial Phase III

Large number of patients randomly assigned either to the treatment under investigation or the best available treatment


Purpose (is it as good or better)

Drugs trial Phase IV

Postmarketing surveillance trial of patients after approval


Purpose (can it stay)

Neither patient nor doctor knows whether the patient is in the treatment or control group

Double-blinded

Random assignment to experimental group and control group

Randomized

Experimental group receives experimental treatment and control group receives placebo

Controlled

Proportion of all people with disease who test positive, or the probability that a test detects disease when disease is present

Sensitivity (true positive rate)

Proportion of all people without disease who test negative, or the probability that a test indicates non-disease when disease is absent

Specificity (true negative rate)

Proportion of positive test results that are true positive

Positive predictive value

Proportion of negative test results that are true negative

Negative predictive value

What is the formula of sensitivity

=TP/ (TP+FN)

If sensitivity is 100% TP/ (TP+FH) =

1


FN=0, and all negatives must be TNs

What is the formula of Specificity

TN/ (TN+FP)

If specificity is 100% TN/ (TN+FP)=

1


FP=0, and all positives must be TPs

What is the formula of Positive predictive value

TP/(TP+FP)

Positive predictive value varies directly with

Prevalence and Pretest probability

What is the formula of negative predictive value

TN/(TN+FN)

Negative predictive value varies inversely with

Prevalence or pretest probability

Test + and Disease +

True positive

Test + Disease -

False positive

Test - Disease +

False negative


Test - Disease -

True positive

How is incidence rate defined?

Number of new casa in a specified time period / Population at risk during the same time period

How is prevalence defined?

Number of existing cases / Population at risk

What is odds ratio?

Odds that the group with disease was exposed to a risk factor (cases) divided by the odds that the group without disease was exposed. (controls)

How is odds ratio calculated?

a/c / b/d = ad/bc

What is relative risk?

Risk of developing disease in the exposed group divided by risk in the unexposed group

Quantifying risk typically used in case-control studies

Odds ratio

Quantifying risk typically used in cohort studies

Relative risk

What is the relative risk reduction?

The proportion of risk reduction attributable to the intervention as compared to the control

How is relative risk reduction calculated?

RRR = 1-RR

What is attributable risk?

The difference in risk between exposed and unexposed groups, or the proportion of disease occurrences that are attributable to the exposure

How is relative risk calculated?

RR = a/(a + b) / c/(c + d)

How is attributable risk calculated?

AR = a/a+b - c/c+d


What is absolute risk reduction(ARR)?

The difference in risk attributable to the intervention as compared to a control

What is the number needed to treat?

Number of patients who need to be treated for 1 patient to benefit. Calculated as 1/ARR

What is the number needed to harm?

Number of patients who need to be exposed to a risk factor for 1 patient to be harmed. Calculated as 1/AR

What is the mean?

Sum of values/total number of values

What is the median?

middle value of a list of data sorted from least to greatest

What is the mode?

most common value

What is the standard deviation?

How much variability exists from the mean in a set of values

What is the standard error of the mean?

An estimation of how much variability exists between the sample mean and the true population mean

How is the standard error of the mean calculated?

SEM = SD/√n

How is the graph shaped in normal distribution?

Bell-shaped


Mean = medium = mode

What is bimodal distribution?

Nonnormal, suggests 2 different populations

What is positive skew distribution?

Nonnormal, Asymmetry with longer tail on the right.


Mean>median>mode

What is negative skew?

Nonnormal, asymmetry with longer tail on the left


Mean<median<mode

Stating that there is an effect when one exists

Correct result

Stating that there is an effect when none exists (null hypothesis incorrectly rejected in favor of alternative hypothesis)

Type I error

Stating that there is not an effect when one exists (null hypothesis is not rejected when it is in fact false)

Type II error



How do you increase power and decrease the probability of making a type II error?

Increasing sample size, increased expected effect size and increasing precision of measurement

What is confidence interval (CI)?

Range of values in which a specified probability of the means of repeated samples would be expected to fall

When CI = 95%, Z = ...

1.96 = 2

When CI = 99%, Z =...

2.58