• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/153

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

153 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is the purpose of the judicial branch?
to interpret the law
The judicial branch interprets ____ and ______
facts and the law
Structure of the judicial system - How many separate judicial systems are there.
Each state has one (50) + 1 federal system = 51
Within systems, there are subdivisions.
the area over which a court has the authority to interpret the facts of the events that occur and to interpret the laws
jurisdiction
What type of jurisdiction only deals with federal crimes, such as killing a federal official, interstate murders; only deals with federal laws (interstate in nature); and the Constutitution (statutes, regulations)?
Federal Jurisdiction
opposite of federal jurisdiction
state jurisdiction
What type of jurisdiction only deals with matters of state law (safety, health, morality, general welfare)? -vast majority of lawsuits that deal with criminal crimes
State jurisdiction
State jurisdiction is defined by what amendment?
10th
a law that deals with a violation against the state (burden of proof is on the state)
criminal law
opposite of criminal law
civil law
conflicts between individuals
civil law - violations against society as a whole; normally involve millions or billions of dollars
What type of jurisdiction are courts that deal with any case that comes to them; this is the official part of the government whose job it is to solve everyday conflicts
general jurisdiction
opposite of general jurisdiction
limited jurisdiction
specialized courts have _____ jurisdiction (family court, drug court, criminal court)
limited
What type of jurisdiction establishes that most courts must take every issue that comes to them, including stupid ones?
mandatory jurisdiction
opposite of mandatory jurisdiction
discretionary jurisdiction
What was a way to try to get rid of stupid cases because they take up the court's time?
Tort reform
What type of jurisdiction uses summary judgment and establishes whether or not there's even a matter of law there?
Discretionary jurisdiction
What type of jurisdiction deals with cases that involve questions of facts?
original jurisdiction
opposite of original jurisdiction
appellate jurisdiction
What type of jurisdiction tries to establish that the law has failed you, is bad/illegal, the court wasn't run right? Arguments are based on laws, not facts.
Appellate jurisdiction
highest court in the u.s. judicial system
supreme court
structure of the federal system
1. supreme court
2. courts of appeal
3. district courts
What is the only court the Constitution makes mention of?
Supreme Court
The problem with the Articles of Confederation was that until the Constitution was enacted, there was a _____ court, only _____ courts.
supreme, state
the court that rules the land
s. court
courts of appeal operate through ______.
circuits
How many circuits are there in the federal courts of appeal?
9
What federal courts exist in particular states, deals with issues within states, and do not cross state lines?
district courts
highest court in the state
courts of last resory
a court that most states have, but not all
intermediate appellate cort
lowest court of the state
trial/district court
let the decision stand
stare decisis
Courts of the past have decided this way, so courts of the future will too.
common law tradition
Look at diagram involving courts and jurisdictions.
note
What did Marbury vs. Madison establish?
judicial review
First documented case in human history in which political authority moves from one party to the opposition party
Election of 1800
Who were the two parties involved in the election of 1800?
Adams & Jefferson
Adams party
federalist
What did Adams do to make life more difficult for the democratic republicans coming in & to keep some federalists in power?
appointed a number of midnight judges that would hold positions even after adams leaves office
jefferson's party
democratic republicans, a.k.a. jeffersonians
In the case of Marbury vs. Madison, _____ was appointed as a midnight judge by _____ and confirmed by _____. After the inauguration comes and goes, _____ has yet to receive his _____. He goes to the Secretary of state (_____) to find out why. The secretary of state refuses to give him his commission. Marbury decides that he needs a _____ to get his commission. He goes back to the judicial act of 1789 where congress states that in cases involving writs of mandamus, the U.S. Supreme court shall have _____ jurisdiction. The case is taken by the Supreme court. The chief justice _____ is a _____. He knew that he would be ignored and though of as weak if he said Madison needed to give writ to Marbury (also would go against trying to make Supreme Court more powerful) If he didn't give Marbury his commission, he'd also be seen as weak. In _____ of the Constitution, every possible federal case is there. He ruled that the writ of mandamus case doesn't fit with _____ jurisdiction and that Congress violated the law of
William Marbury, John Adams, Senate, Marbury, commission, James Madison, writ of mandamus, original, John Marshall, federalist, Art. II, original, Constitution
an order from a court to some other part of government ordering them to do something
writ of mandamus
judge that will lead the court in answering
chief justice
one of the most influential S. Court justices of all time who radically altered the S. Court and turned it into a more prestigious institution
John Marshall
taking the actions of some other part of government, usually Congress, and seeing if they're consistent with the Constitution
judicial review
John Marshall ruled that Marbury's _____ but he's in the _____ because the law that told him to come here was not good law.
right, wrong
If Congress does something in opposition to the Constitution, it is _____ and _____.
null, void
Both judicial _____ and judicial _____ are used in judicial review
activism, restraint
judges in the court interpret cases the way they thing they should be (judges make the law)
judicial activism
courts bow down to decisions of Congress, Exec. Branch, States
judicial restraint
In cases that involve statutory interpretation _____ courts spend a lot of time on these (not _____ court)
federal, supreme
cases that involve the court interpreting what a statue means
statutory interpretation
executive agencies often find themselves in lawsuits because of how they're _____ and _____ statues
enforcing and interpreting
In federal courts, judges are _____, selected by the _____, and confirmed by _____ all the way down to _____judges)
appointed, president, senate, district
Judges of federal courts have _____ tenure.
lifetime
A criticism of lifetime tenure
judges are in no sense responsive to the wills of the people
the only way that judges can be impeached
if they've done something illegal
3 ways of staffing state benches
1. appointment- less common
2. election - elected by people, run for reelection (corruption
3. missouri plan (combine the two)
- judges appointed by the governor, retain their seats by elections
Rostow argued that their is something inherently _____ about judges who have lifetime tenures.
democratic
Rostow's Argument- Antidemocratic and counter majoritarian don't mean the same thing. The center of democracy is relying on _____.
elections
Rostow says that there has to be an inherent limit of what _____ can do. There has to be rights possessed by each _____, has to be more than just the rule of the _____.
majorities, individual, majority
Rostow- Democracy is based on the will of the _____ but has to respect the will of the _____.
masses, individuals
Rostow- frequently courts must rule against the will of the _____, for _____. They have to overturn something the _____ wanted because they wanted something that the Constitution couldn't do
majority, minority rights, majority
What keeps Congress from deviating too far away from the masses so they'll be reelected?
Democratic Process
The reason behind lifetime tenure is to enable the judge to rule on the _____ instead of _____
law, popular behavior
The _____ we put in power appoints judges and _____ who confirm the judges determine the _____ of the courts.
president, senators, composition
Congress can't lower the _____ of a supreme court judge.
salary
a label attached to courts frequently
tyranny
Federalist 78 (Hamilton) says that the judiciary is the _____ dangerous branch.
least
Each branch has a certain authority. At the same time, that's their _____ authorities. The Supreme Court can't _____ or _____ the laws.
only, write, enforce
Hamilton says that the judicial branch is the least dangerous because it has _____ not .
judgment, will
Hamilton Fed. 78 says that the supreme court can _____ the law, but do not have the power to make something happen (_____)
interpret, will
Hamilton Fed. 78 says that the j. branch lacks _____ and _____
purse, sword
purse in hamilton's comparison refers to what
legislative branch's monetary power
sword in hamilton's comparison refers to what
executive branch's enforcement power
a petition submitted to the court, loser of the lower court petitioning the s. court to take their case
writ of certiorari
In conference judges operate in _____.
Rule of 4 (4 judges have to agree to accept case)
2 kinds of briefs
party briefs, amicus curiae
parties to the case, attorney submits brief, argument why the court should rule in their favor
party briefs
briefs submitted by people who are not involved in the case trying to convince judges to rule a certain way
amicus curiae
Amicus curiae lets people try to _____ through _____ the S. Court.
lobby, argument
Oral arguments have a max of _____ hours, there are no _____ or _____. It's basically just arguing with the judges because most judges have already formed an opinion.
1, testimony, witnesses
In the second conference, the judges decide who wins by _____. Then they will write _____ which are published in a document called _____.
majority, opinions. U.S. reports
Steps of the Supreme Court Process
1. Writ of Certiorari
2. Conference "Rule of 4" (80-90)
3. Briefing (Party, Amicus Curiae)
4. Oral Arguments
5. Conference
6. Opinions (U.S. Report)
The Constitution isn't self-evident and must be _____
interpreted
2 supreme court judges that served on the supreme court together for a number of years that had the highest disagreement rate in history
brennan, rehnquist
justice brennan's approach
developmentalism (living constitution)
rehnquists judicial philosophy was _____
strict construction
components of strict construction
plain meaning approach, original intent
Rehnquist relied more on what component of strict construction
original intent
when interpreting the constitution, rely on text of constitution and interpret that text by plain meaning
plain meaning approach
Whoever wrote this, what did they mean by it?
original intent
Brennan says that _____ on the part of the judge is always present
interpretation
Brennan accuses Rehnquist of imagining judges don't add their own _____
value
Brennan says that the idea of the Constitution is that there are some things that the _____ can't do
majority
look at constitution not as a set of specific rules, but embodying certain values/ things change over time, interpret for today's time
living constitution
Concept of legal positivism was more dominant in _____ ideology. It means that _____ and _____ are two separate things.
Rehnquist, law, morality
The Constitution is a document of _____ not _____ according to Rehnquist.
law, morality
Rehnquist says that right and wrong is determined by _____ and in general _____
legislatures, majorites
the freedoms and rights an individual possesses against the larger society
civil liberties
Even people through majoritarian politics can't do certain things to one another. Most are in the _____.
Bill of Rights
First amendment rights
freedom of press, petition, assembly, religion speech
Schenck vs. U.S. developed what test?
Clear and Present Danger Test
Schenck V. U.S. says that freedom of speech does not mean you are free to yell fire in a crowded theater because chaos would ensue. The man in this case was a anarchist who believes that the U.S. is engaging in an immoral unjustified _____. Through a series of publications, he says the U.S. should stay out of what would eventually be known as WWI. One publication encourages people who agree with him to _____.
war, ignore the draft
Democracy does allow people to express _____ to current policy (speech)
opposition
In Schenck vs. U.S., J. Holmes says that there is the freedom to express opposition to the direction in which U.S. policy is going. However, encouraging people to disobey the draft could lead to the military not being staffed with enough soldiers, so the _____ test was developed.
Clear and Present Danger
You have the right to speak but have to recognize that speech can be dangerous. Speech can be restricted when there is _____ and _____ danger by _____.
clear, present, context
In the modern world, both _____ and _____ are used to determine whether or not someone can have their speech restricted.
content, context
You can't have a ban on language based on _____. By and large, courts rely on _____.
content, context
Most courts agree that actions are still _____
speech. You can't ban the burning of the cross as a freedom of speech.
Types of speech that because of their context produce bad content and are prohibited:
libel, obscenity
defamation of a person's character or reputation, not protected by the 1st amendment
libel
what s deemed purely obscene, the government can ban if they want
obscenity
If something has _____ merit it is protected to express _____ attitudes.
artistic, political
2 clauses that protect the freedom of religion
free exercise and establishment
can't make laws/policies that prevent you from freely exercising the religion of your choice, prohibits the gov't from requiring or prohibiting any type of belief. However prohibition religions from using drugs is legitimate. The government is required to give a person the right not to work on their religious days (only get one)
free exercise
What clause prohibits the government from making official religions
establishment
What court case recognized that while a government can't endorse a religion, they frequently have to interact
lemon v. kurtzman
under lemon vs. kurtman, there are three components a policy must meet
1. secular purpose
2. neutral effect
3. avoid excessive entanglement
most common for individuals to interact with their government
criminal law
Locke- important freedoms -> essential liberties
life, liberty property
Art I and Art IV limit what?
limits on ex post facto laws (can't make a crime after the fact), bills of attainder (can't circumvent the courts), habeas corpus (can't be arrested without a charge being brought against you
can only take away freedoms through a process that is fair
due process
When it comes to due, process what amendment strictly applies to the federal government?
5th
When it comes to due process, what amendment extends it to the states?
14th
You have to assume that people are _____ until proven _____
innocent, guilty
Burden of proof is placed upon the _____
state.. beyond all reasonable doubt
Our legal system is based on the recognition that we can never know the _____
actual guilt
What amendment establishes protections that deal with search & seizure?
4
Cops need a _____ to search people
warrant
What court case was based on illegal searches and seizures and established a nationwide requirement for due process?
Mapp v. Ohio
punish the state by leaving out evidence that was gathered illegally
exclusionary rule; Mapp v. Ohio
What is the significance of Mapp v. Ohio
It defines due process, illegally gathered elements can't be used in a trial
What amendment has to do with double jeopardy?
5th
can't be tried for the same crime twice
double jeopardy
What was the Miranda v. Arizona case
A kidnapper who was questioned without an attorney, didn't know that he didn't have to answer their questions or had the right to an attorney, so he confesses and is proven guilty. This violated due process. He was retried without a confession and still found guilty. It established that people have a right to be informed, not talk, and to an attorney.
What amendment guarantees a right to counsel?
6th
Gideon v. Wainwright said what?
In criminal matters regardless of severity, counsel myst be provided
What amendment protects against c & u punishment?
8th
civil war amendments
13, 14, 15
What did the 14th amendment establish?
due process & equal protection
What did Griswold v. Connecticut establish?
right to privacy
Griswold vs. Connecticut case
doctor with planned parenthood, advised married couple on birth control options...
Majority rules in G vs. C that privacy is a right implied
note
constitution casts certain shadows and within those we can find things implied
penumbral rights
Roe v. Wade
Texas, abortion, RIGHT TO PRIVACY
Lawrence v. Texas
sodomy laws, two gay men arrested for engaging in homosexual contact. requirement sex act private & consensual
requires that each state treat its citizens equally with its laws
equal protection clause
laws frequently must classify groups by race, gender, age, etc
classification
Plessy v. Ferguson
Louisiana - Trains will have black & white cars, developed separate but equal, if equal in nature
Brown v. board of education
challenge to topeka, ks dpt of education that provided for segregated schools, makes de jure (blacks and white to be treated differently) illegal, puts requirements on states for affirmatie actions
What did brown v. board of ed establish
affirmative actions