Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
77 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is a mass
|
a space occupying lesion seen in two different projections
|
|
Describe the contour of a mass
|
convex
|
|
What is the density of a mass (center vs periphery)
|
denser in the center than periphery
|
|
3 characteristics of a mass according to birads
|
seen in 2 projections
convex contour denser in center than periphery |
|
What are 6 characteristics that must be examined when looking at a mass
|
size
location density shape margins interval change |
|
Does the size of a mass predict benign Vs malignant etiology
|
no
|
|
Does size affect the clinical managment of a mass
|
no
|
|
What does size affect
|
the clinical managment (large palpable masses may be biopsied under palpation guidance)
|
|
Where is the MC quadrant of breast cancer
|
upper outer
|
|
Does a mass being in the upper outer quadrant affect managment
|
no bc the most common location of benign tumors is in the upper outer quadrant
|
|
If a mass is seen within the skin can it be a primary breast cancer
|
no
|
|
What are the 2 common views of breast imaging in screening
|
CC and MLO
|
|
If a mass has indistinct margins should it be biopsied
|
yes (make sure all supsicious lesions are not in the skin)
|
|
What is the typical appearance of a skin lesion
|
air halo surrounding it
|
|
What view should be obtained if you suspect a skin lesion
|
tangential
|
|
What are the different birad density classifications
|
fat
mixed fibroglandular |
|
How is fibroglandular subdivided
3 |
high, equal (isodense) and low
|
|
What are fat density and mixed density considered; benign or malignant
|
benign
|
|
Name 3 fat containing masses
|
oil cyst
lipoma galactocele |
|
Name mixed density masses
|
hamartoma
lymphnode |
|
What is a hamartoma often referred to in the breast
|
fibroadenolipoa
|
|
What is a classic appearnace of a lipoma and oil cyst of the breast
|
fat density mass with a pseudocapsule
|
|
Are lipomas and oil cyst palpable
|
yes (but still dont biopsy)
|
|
What type of benign fat containing breast lesion may have a fat fluid level
|
galactocele
|
|
What is a classic give away that a lesion is a hamartoma
|
this one is different it is mixed density but has a pseudocapsule and is classic for a hamartoma
|
|
What is the classic appearance of a intramammary LN
|
mixed density mass with a fatty hilum
|
|
What are the 5 characteristics of interpreting a mass (we have be going throug)
|
size
location density shape margin |
|
What is the most helpful category for deteming how to manage a mass
|
shape
|
|
What is the BIRADS descriptors for shape
|
round
oval lobular irregular |
|
What shape is considered highly suspicious
|
irregular
|
|
What does BIRADS consider round, oval and lobular shapes
|
probably benign
|
|
What are the BIRADS descriptors for the margins of a mass
5 |
circumscribed
microlobulated obscured indistinct spiculated |
|
What margin does BIRADS consider likely benign
|
well circumscribed
|
|
What margins will always require additional work up
|
microlobulated
obscured indistinct spiculated |
|
What percent of the margin are you required to see inorder to call a lesion circumscribed
|
>75%
|
|
If a mass is microlobulated what percent of cancer is there
|
50%
|
|
Do masses with indistinct or spiculated margins need to be biopsied
|
yes
|
|
If a lesion appears well circumscribed but you are unable to see >75% of the border what should be done
|
additional views or US
|
|
What should be done with masses that have multiple margins (part well defined and part spiculated)
|
act on the feature that is most suspicious
|
|
Once you find a mass that is suspicious what is always the next step
|
spot compression views and magnification
|
|
What is the categorization of a suspicious mass on screening
|
birads 0 (need additional workup)
|
|
What are the 6 steps to interpretating a mass (fix prior slide)
|
size
location density shape margins -->interval change |
|
What are the 4 categories of interval change of a mass
|
new mass
interval enlargement of mass borders mor lobular or indistinct appearance of new calcifications |
|
Is new mass, interval enlargement of mass borders, more lobular or indistinct and appearance of new calcifications all worrisome
|
yes
|
|
Is US useful for diagnosing cyst
|
yes
|
|
What type of masses will be get a birads category 3
|
shape; round, oval or lobular
margin; well circumscirbed |
|
If a mass is stable for 2 years what is the birads classification
|
birads 2
|
|
If there is a mass and it is not a classic benign structure, is not round, oval, or lobular and have well circumscribed margin what should be done
|
additional imaging and then biopsy if the same
|
|
What are 3 benign features?
|
fat
pseudocapsule in the skin |
|
If a mass has benign features what is the birads category
|
2
|
|
What are 4 types of asymmetries
|
asymmetry
global asymmetry focal asymmetry developing asymmetry |
|
What was formerly called a density
|
a asymmetry
|
|
Define an asymmetry
|
area of fibroglandular density tissue seen in one view only
|
|
What do 80% of asymmetries represent
|
superimposition of normal breast tissue
'summation artifact' |
|
What is global asymmetry
|
substantially greater volume of fibroglandular tissue in one breast than in the corresponding location of the contralateral breast
|
|
Does global asymmetry occupy more than one quadrant
|
yes
|
|
Does global asymmetry have assoicated mass, calcification or architectual distortion
|
no
|
|
If the right breast is much denser than the left what is it called
|
global asymmetry
|
|
What do the vast majority of global asymmetry represent
|
a normal variant
|
|
When should additional workup be considered with global asymmetry
|
associated mass
grouped microcalcifications architectual distortion palpable correlate |
|
What are the first two categories of asymmetries that we have covered
|
asymmetry
global asymmetry (next focal asymmetry) |
|
What is a focal asymmetry
|
fibroglandular tissue asymmetry occupying less than 1 quadrant
visible on two views lacks convex outward contours (not a mass) |
|
What could a focal asymmetry represent
|
an island of normal breast tissue
|
|
What makes a focal asymmetry seem suspicious
|
it may lack interspersed fat and therefore warrant additional workup
|
|
What are the similarity between a mass and a focal asymmetry
|
focal asymmetry and mass
space occupying lesion seen in two different views |
|
What are the differences between a focal asymmetry and a mass
|
focal asymmetry
concave borders (mass has convex) interspersed fat (mas is denser in the center than perphery) |
|
When a focal asymmetry is not associated with suspicious features (no mass, calcification, architectual distortion or palpable correlate) has what % chance of malignancy
|
less than 1%
|
|
What is the work up for a focal asymmetry
5 |
rule out summation artifact (repeat same view)
change beam obliquity slightly breast obliquity via the roll view spot compression and mag views targeted ultrasoud (like a real lesion) |
|
What should be done if a pt has a focal asymmetry
|
call patient back and repeat same view (slight different technique may 'resolve' asymmetry)
|
|
What is the baseline Birads category for a focal asymmetry
|
3
|
|
What is the birads of a focal asymmetry after 3 years of stability
|
2
|
|
What are the 3 prior types of asymmetries we have discussed
|
asymmetry
global asymmetry focal asymmetry (now developing asymmetry) |
|
What is a developing asymmetry
|
focal asymmetry that is new, larger or denser than prior study
|
|
What is the category of a developing asymmetry
|
4
|
|
What is the likelihood of malignancy of a developing asymmetry
|
13-27%
|
|
If you see a focal asymmetry for the first time what is the birads category (if patient had priors)
|
4
|
|
What are the birads categories for all the breast asymmetries discussed (general)
|
asymmetry 1
global asymmetry 2 focal asymmmetry 3 developing asymmetry 4 |