• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

S70 A Charities and Trustees Investment (S) Act 2005

There is a special provision of how trustees can be appointed.


Disqualified under S69

How can new trustees be appointed?

S3(b) 1921 - Deed of assumption. Trustees can appoint a new trustee.




S22 1921 - The court can appoint a trustee




Nobile Officium - the court has a common law power to appoint upon deadlock.




S34(5)/70A 2005 - For charities

Sch B Trusts (S) Act 1921

When a new trustee is appointed the patrimony must be conveyed. This is done in accordance with sch B.




It must be added to the land register for a real right.

Ker v City of Glasgow

Acceptance can be implied.


Ker acted as trustee, signed some documents and this meant that he was joint and severally liable. Best expressly decline.

Resignation of a trustee

S3(a) 1921 - allows a trustee to resign office except where prohibited by the trust deed says or due to 3(1) or (2). you cannot resign if you are sole trustee.




S19 - A minute of resignation is required. Explains which ones can be used




Trustees that are paid cannot simply quit

McKenna v Rafique

Sheriff suggested that explicitly resigning 'I'm done, I resign' could count.




However, note that in Ker v City of Glasgow Bank being inactive does not constitute resignation.



Moness Country Club v First National Trust Co Ltd

With the purpose of the trust it appeared that the trustee could simply be replaced by the beneficiaries (the clerk and office members)

S23 1921 Act

Covers certain grounds for removal - insanity, incapacity, absence from the UK, disappearance for 6 months.


Prelonged absence discretionary whether remove


REMOVAL REQUIRED IF INSANE OR INCAPAX

Effect of removal/resignation on patrimony/liabilities

There is no need for a conveyance - the remaining trustees automatically become the joint owners (minus old trustee).




Neither removal or resignation reduces or removes the personal liability of the trustee. However, there is not further liability.

Lapsed trusts

If there are no trustees left then the court can appoint new trustees.


S22 1921

Wolfe v Richardson

Any decision binding the trust must be by a quorum of trustees (unless trust deed provides otherwise).


Must be quorum of all the trustees - not just those that have turned up.

S3(c) 1921 act

Definition of quorum. This is what is used




Apart from if the trust deed sets another number.

Wyse v Abbott

All trustees must be consulted


2/3 trustees decided to assume new trustees but this was invalid as the 3rd trustee had not been consulted.

Malcom v Goldie

Held that it is okay not to consult a trustee if they are not contactable within reasonable time.




In this case it would take 6 weeks for the trustee to receive the letter

S7 Act 1921

Although joint property a quorum can technically push through a deed. Land register will accept a deed if the quorum can explain why the others did not sign

Where can you find the trustee's powers?


And examples of these powers

S4 1921 act



  • Sell all or part of the estate (heritable or movable)
  • lease all or part of heritable property
  • borrow money on security of trade estate
  • Convey (excamb) heritable property
  • Acquire/invest in heritable property
  • discharge trustees who have resigned and the representatives of trustees who have died

Rezac's Excrs v Rezac's Ex

S4 provides general powers but the powers exercised cannot be at invariance with the terms or purpose of the deed.


They were going to sell a property subject to a liferent and this was against the purpose and therefore not allowed.

S5 1921 act

If there is any question to whether a power/action is at invariance with the terms, then a s5 can be raised.




Allows them to exercise s4 regardless if there in an invariance with the terms

Administration under Nobile Officium

The Court of Session can grant additional powers. It remedies 2 situations:



  • No legal rule adequately covering a given situation
  • Where there is a legal rule, the application would be unduly excessive, oppressive or burdensome

Investment of trust funds

S4(1)(ea) - allows for unrestricted right to acquire land and invest it




S4A - they must be careful with their investments. There must be diversification (not all eggs in one basket)

S2(1) Trusts (S) Act 1961

VERY IMPORTANT -


Cannot void 3rd party transactions (even if it was a bad faith transaction).




Donations can still be struck down. Has to be a transaction.

S2(2) Trusts (S) Act 1961

Although transaction cannot be struck down -


Trustee personally liable and will have to make up the loss from their own personal patrimony.




not clear what loss would be for sentimental values.

Sanders v Sanders' Trs

Contracts by trustees - if the contract was entered into ultra vires, then the trustee's personal patrimony is liable.

Gordon v Campbell

Contract with a third party -


This one was intra vires and expressly contracted as a trustee. The trust's patrimony was liable.

Brown v Sutherland

Contracts with a third party - who is liable?


They failed to mention that they were acting as trustees when signing the bill of exchange.

Alexander's Trs v Dymock's Trs

When looking at which capacity the trustee has entered into the contract, they may look at the nature of the contract.




In this, they were entering into the contract as a group and therefore it was implied that it was as trustees not individuals.

Cunningham v Montgomery

Where the trustees are personally liable for a contract -


They can pay the third party from the trust patrimony first. This liability wiped out the trust patrimony and the two trustees.

Appointment of agents

S4f 1921 - The trustees can appoint agents: 'factors and law agents'.


Trustee still ultimately liable - however, if they supervised and paid due care, then they are not personally liable. Not strict liability.

Scott v Occidental Petroleum (Caledonia)

The traditional view is that a trustee can delegate their administrative duties, but not their discretionary ones.


This case was on fiduciary duties (not trustee but legal representative, ratio still relevant).


YOU CANNOT DELEGATE FIDUCIARY DUTIES.

S16 1921

Advance of vested share to minor for beneficiary for education and maintenance.