• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Intent to ____ (2 answers)
act, harm
fragile skull
take your plaintiff as you find them
false imprisonment elements
intent to confine another within fixed boundaries, person confined is conscious of the confinement
IIED elements
intentional, extreme and outrageous, causal connection, proof of distress
what is "sufficient communication"?
enough so that a reasonable person would understand
self-defense elements
reasonable belief of harm, reasonable contact
jury role in negligence
find facts, set standards of care
BPL
Burden should be less than the Probability of loss, and the Loss amount
2 areas where children are deficient as far as negligence is concerned
bad data, bad judgment
Per Se elements
violation of statute, causation, protected class
res ipsa three elements
the action would not ordinarily happen without negligence, exclusive control of the defendant (old), and events not caused by injured party
4 standards of scientific knowledge:
testable, peer review, rate of error, general acceptability*

*this was the old standard, before other three were added
dillon rule, three factors
contemporaneous, shock from direct emotional impact, relationship between plaintiff and victim
Impact rule, 4 part test
proximate cause, emotional distress HAS TO bring physical injury, emotional distress caused by D, reaction must be reasonable (no thin skin rule)
3 catagories of land entrants
trespassor, liscensees, invitees
pure comparative negligence
damages are exactly recoverable based on percent of the fault
two moditfied comparative negligence schemes:
1)D's fault is be greater than P's for P to recover
2)D's fault must be greater than 50% for P to recover
4 catagories of indivisible harm:
actors knowingly join together, actors fail to perform a common duty, special relationship between the actors, independant acts combine to create the harm
2 rules for abnormally dangerous activities:
not common usage, high chance of harm even if all rules followed
3 reasons for punitive damages
deterrence, retribution, compensation
Garret v. Dailey
chair pulled out case, minors are liable for intentional torts but not for negligence
Ranson v. Kitner
wolf/dog case