Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
22 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Intent to ____ (2 answers)
|
act, harm
|
|
fragile skull
|
take your plaintiff as you find them
|
|
false imprisonment elements
|
intent to confine another within fixed boundaries, person confined is conscious of the confinement
|
|
IIED elements
|
intentional, extreme and outrageous, causal connection, proof of distress
|
|
what is "sufficient communication"?
|
enough so that a reasonable person would understand
|
|
self-defense elements
|
reasonable belief of harm, reasonable contact
|
|
jury role in negligence
|
find facts, set standards of care
|
|
BPL
|
Burden should be less than the Probability of loss, and the Loss amount
|
|
2 areas where children are deficient as far as negligence is concerned
|
bad data, bad judgment
|
|
Per Se elements
|
violation of statute, causation, protected class
|
|
res ipsa three elements
|
the action would not ordinarily happen without negligence, exclusive control of the defendant (old), and events not caused by injured party
|
|
4 standards of scientific knowledge:
|
testable, peer review, rate of error, general acceptability*
*this was the old standard, before other three were added |
|
dillon rule, three factors
|
contemporaneous, shock from direct emotional impact, relationship between plaintiff and victim
|
|
Impact rule, 4 part test
|
proximate cause, emotional distress HAS TO bring physical injury, emotional distress caused by D, reaction must be reasonable (no thin skin rule)
|
|
3 catagories of land entrants
|
trespassor, liscensees, invitees
|
|
pure comparative negligence
|
damages are exactly recoverable based on percent of the fault
|
|
two moditfied comparative negligence schemes:
|
1)D's fault is be greater than P's for P to recover
2)D's fault must be greater than 50% for P to recover |
|
4 catagories of indivisible harm:
|
actors knowingly join together, actors fail to perform a common duty, special relationship between the actors, independant acts combine to create the harm
|
|
2 rules for abnormally dangerous activities:
|
not common usage, high chance of harm even if all rules followed
|
|
3 reasons for punitive damages
|
deterrence, retribution, compensation
|
|
Garret v. Dailey
|
chair pulled out case, minors are liable for intentional torts but not for negligence
|
|
Ranson v. Kitner
|
wolf/dog case
|