• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/37

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

37 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Incapacity - Intentional Torts
Every D s/b held liable for ITs = no incapacity defenses!
Intentional Torts - Battery
Intent by D to cause a harmful or offensive contact and contact results with, to, or upon P's person
- offensive = unpermitted by persons of ordinary sensitivity
- does not have to happen immediately or involve P's person (holding, touching, connected w/)
Intentional Torts - Intent Requirement
specific intent or a knowledge to substantial certainty that the consequences will result
Intentional Torts - Causation Requirement
Satisfied when D's conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about P's injury
Intentional Torts - Assault
D intentionally places P in reasonable apprehension of immediate battery (harmful or offensive contact)
- Apprehension does not mean fear, but knowledge!

Words alone not enough - requires overt conduct like brandishing a weapon.
Intentional Torts - False Imprisonment
D intentionally engages in an act of restraint that results in P's confinement to a bounded area, AND P knows of the confinement or is harmed by it.
- Threats c/b sufficient if meaningful to a person of ordinary sensitivity

Bounded area = 360 degrees, all directions.
- Not bounded if reasonably discoverable and reasonable means of escape (no right to subject P to physical danger)
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
D intentionally engages in outrageous conduct meant to upset P and results in severe ED to P.
- Reckless behavior is enough
- Conduct that exceeds all bounds of decency tolerated in a civilized society

PLUS factors w/ hallmarks of outrageousness
- continuous or repetitive conduct
- type of D = common carrier, innkeeper, etc.
- P is a fragile class = young children, elderly, pregnant women
- Hypersensitive persons IF D knew of the sensitivity (outrageous to target a known emotional vulnerability)
Intentional Torts - Trespass to Land
Intent to enter land (merely crossing a boundary), act of physical invasion to land of someone who is in actual or constructive possession w/o privilege or consent.
- Physical presence or throwing/causing a tangible object to go there
- includes air above and below, to a reasonable distance
Intentional Torts - Trespass to Chattels and Conversion
Intentional interference w/ P's right of possession in chattel (intermeddling/dispossession), causation, actual damages.
- Recovery = actual damages from harm to chattel or loss of use, rental value

Conversation
- intentional act by D interfering w/ P's right of possession in chattel (wrongful acquisition, detention, transfer, or substantially changing, severely damaging or misusing chattel), causation and damages
- so serious, it warrants D paying FMV - like a forced sale
Intentional Torts - Affirmative Defenses
Consent - defense if P had legal capacity
- Narrows to scope of consent
- Express or Implied

Protective Privileges - self-defense and of property

Necessity

Recapture of Chattels
Re-entry onto Land
Consent Affirmative Defense
Express
- giving D permission to behave in the challenged way
- void if given under fraud or duress

Implied
- Apparent by Custom and Usage = participating in activity or going to a place where routine invasions are customary OR D's reasonable interpretation of P's objective conduct
- Implied by Law = when action necessary to save a life OR another important interest in person or property
Protective Privileges - Defense
M/b response to conduct in-progress or imminent = in the moment!

Reasonable belief that threat is genuine - reasonable mistake w/n negate availability of defense.

Test = D reasonably believes she is being/about to be attacked, use reasonably necessary force to prevent injury, same as to defend 3P, and to protect property IF request cease and desist or tort already committed.
- no deadly force to protect property
Necessity Defense
Property torts only.

Public = D interferes w/ P's property to protect community/particular group
- absolute defense!

Private = D invades P's property to protect his own interests
- limited defense
- D liable for actual harm done, but NOT nominal/punitive damages
- D free to remain on land in position of safety until emergency ends - P m/b liable for ejecting, expelling, etc.
Common Law Defamation
D makes defamatory statement specifically IDing P, publishes it, and damage results to P.
- mere insults are not defamatory
- reflects negatively on trait of character - honesty, morality, etc.
- negligent publication sufficient

DAMAGES
- LIbel = d/n/h to prove damages to get to jury. Same for radio and tv broadcasts
- Slander Per Se = no need to prove damages for spoken statements concerning P's business or profession, that P committed crime of moral turpitude, imputing on a woman's chastity, or suffering from a loathsome disease
- Other Slander = M/show economic harm
Constitutional Defamation
If matter of PUBLIC CONCERN - adds to CL test
- Falsity = P M/show the statement was false (no truth AD)
- Fault = P M/show D d/n/h reasonable basis for GF belief in accuracy of the statement
- PUBLIC figure = Actual malice standard/proof of reckless behavior or intent by D
- PRIVATE figure = negligence standard (did not act as RP to verify the statement)
Defamation Affirmative Defenses
Consent
Truth = if D can prove statements were factually accurate
Privilege
- Absolute = based on status/ID of speaker
- Qualified = based on circumstances of speech and is available to D if:
- D spoke in GF AND
- D confined herself to matters relevant to the purpose at hand

Mitigating factors - retraction, provocation, lack of malice - will be considered on damages issue, but are not defenses
Privacy Torts
Disclosure = widespread dissemination of confidential information about P that w/b objectionable to an average person (underlying information w/b truthful) - sensitive, private
- Newsworthiness and Dual Life exceptions

Intrusion = D invades P's seclusion in a way objectionable to average person
- P M/h REP; no requirement for physical trespass

Appropriation = D uses P's name/likeness for commercial purpose
- newsworthiness exception

False Light = widespread dissemination of material falsehood about P that w/b objectionable to an average person
- not IT; liable even where D has GF belief in accuracy of information

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES = consent and privileges w/r/t disclosure and false light
Misrepresentation Torts
Intentional Misrepresentation
- fraud and deceit PFC = knowing misrepresentation of material fact intended to induce P to act/refrain in reliance AND actual reliance plus actual damages
- No affirmative defenses

Negligent Misrepresentation
- PFC = D's misrepresentation in a business/professional capacity, breaching a duty to a PARTICULAR P, causation, justifiable reliance, and damages.
Wrongful Institution of Legal Proceedings
Malicious Prosecution
- instituting criminal proceedings against P, terminated in her favor, w/ no PC for prior proceedings (no sufficient facts for RP to believe P was guilty or that D believed so), an improper purpose AND damages
- Prosecutor immune from liability

Abuse of Process
- wrongful use of process for ulterior purpose and definite act or threat against P in order to accomplish the purpose
Interference w/ Business Relations
Existence of valid K relationship or expectation b/t P and 3P
D knows of such relationship/expectancy
D intentionally interferes - inducing br/K or termination of expectancy/relationship
Damages

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
- D's conduct privileged if proper attempt to obtain business or protect interest, most especially when interference is w/ P's prospective business
Negligence Torts - Elements
Duty

Breach of Duty

Causation

Damages
Negligence Torts - Duty
Duty of Care owed to foreseeable Vs - unless rescuers

Standard of Care = reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances (objective!)
- no external attributes
- Exceptions for superior knowledge and physical characteristics (i.e. blindness)
Particular Standards of Care
Children
- Under 4y = legally incapable of negligence and no duty of care
- 4-18y = owes the care of a hypothetical child of similar age, experience and intelligence acting under similar circumstances
- EXCEPT = engaging in adult activity requires RP standard

Professionals/Client Services
- M/h knowledge and skill of a member of the community in good standing = owes care of average member of the profession acting in a similar community
- National standard of care for medical specialists
- Duty to disclose risks of treatment to enable IC. If not and treatment unsuccessful, P can sue and win showing she w/h declined procedure if h/k of risks

Common Carriers/Innkeepers

Land Possessors
Land Possessors' Duty of Care
ACTIVITIES = get RP care across the board. Conditions:

Undiscovered Trespassers = no duty

Discovered/Anticipated Trespassers = protect against all known man-made death traps

Licensees (no economic benefit) = protect against all known traps

Invitees (economic benefit) = protect against all reasonably knowable traps

SPECIAL CATEGORIES:
- firefighters, etc. = can never recover for injury, inherent risk of job
- Children = RP if presence on land is foreseeable

Note: c/discharge by warning or fixing problem
Statutory Standards of Care
P M/demonstrate:
- she is the class of persons statute seeks to protect AND
- accident or injury is in class of risk statute protects against

EXCEPTIONS
- compliance more dangerous than violation or impossible under the circumstances, do NOT borrow the statute
Duties to Act Affirmatively
Generally none - Except:
- Relationship
- Assumption = good samaritan statutes exempt from liability for ordinary, but not gross negligence
- Third Parties = if you have actual ability and authority to control 3P AND know or s/k she is likely to commit acts requiring exercise of that control
- Created the Peril
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
DOES NOT APPLY when P suffers physical trauma to the body b/c of D's negligence.

Must Show:
- P was in zone of physical danger b/c of D's act (near-miss!) AND subsequent physical manifestations

Bystander Cases/Grief and Sadness
- recovery if show proximity along time, space, and relationship
Negligent Torts - Breach of Duty
Res Ipsa Loquitur
- injury normally associated w/ negligence
- show D had control of object
- crates inference and gets to jury

Note: State SOC and any exceptions - specify wrongful behavior and explain why unreasonable ...
Negligent Torts - Causation
Factual/But For = but for breach, P w/h escaped harm
- joint causes = substantial factor test (c/lead to joint liability)
- unascertainable = jointly and severally liable Ds if they caused unascertainability

Legal/PC = measure fairness by foreseeability
- Direct Cause = continuous sequence from D's breach to P's injury (usually - unless results are freakish and bizarre)
- Indirect Cause = intervening stuff - foreseeable and fair if Well-Settled Quartet:
- Intervening Medical Malpractice
- Intervening Negligent Rescue
- Intervening Protection or Reaction Force
- Subsequent Disease or Accident
Negligent Torts - Damages
Punitive = D's conduct was wanton, willful, reckless, malicious

P has duty to mitigate adn c/n recover attorney fees or interest

Not reduced b/c P has collateral sources of recovery

Take P as you find her = all damages, even if they are surprisingly great in scope.
Negligent Torts - Affirmative Defenses
Common Law
- Contributory Negligence = all or nothing/any fault = absolute bar to recovery
- Assumption of Risk = knew of risk and proceeded anyway
- implied if average person w/h appreciated the risk
- no AOR if P d/n/h alternatives

CURRENT = Comparative Negligence
- Jury instruction = assign parties a percentage of fault
- Pure = P recovers something, based on percentage
- Partial/Modified = P recovers only if she is less than 50% responsible - and proportional reduction

Note: Rescuers exposed to certain amount of risk not CN
Strict Liability Torts
Domesticated Animals = when h/k of vicious propensities

Wild Animals = always

Abnormally Dangerous Activities
- Poses risk of serious harm even w/ reasonable care AND
- not a matter of common usage in community

Defective Products
Strict Liability Torts - Defective Products
P M/show:
- D was a merchant/commercial seller/Avis (not casual seller or service provider)
- Prove defect in product
- Manufacturing = safety precautions irrelevant, departs from design in a dangerous way
- Design = another way to build/hypothetical alternative that is safer, economical and practical
- Information = residual risks consumers w/n/b aware of AND lack of warnings
- E that product w/n altered after leaving D's hands (presumed if traveling in ordinary channels) AND
- P made foreseeable use of product (not necessarily intended!)

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
- P carelessness, foolishness, etc. IF P knew of danger
- results in percentage of fault and reduction in recovery
Nuisance Tort
D unreasonable interferes w/ use and enjoyment of property
- d/n/h to be intentional

Balance the Equities = allow D to use property as she likes while guaranteeing P that he w/n/b unduly interfered with
Vicarious Liability
Active and Passive Tortfeasors = always based on relationship
- ER/EE = w/in scope of ET; intentional torts where negligent hiring or retaining
- Hiring parties and Independent K = possessor of land w/b VL if IK hurts an invitee
- Car Owner/Driver = owner not VL unless driver is agent and is doing an errand for owner
- Parent/Child = never - but look for other tort grounds based on parent's conduct
Joint Tortfeasors
Multiple Ds = P collects all money from one D

Out of Pocket D can get back percentages from other Ds

FULL indemnification
- From active tortfeasor if VL
- From manufacturer if non-manufacturer held SL for product defect
Loss of Consortium
Uninjured health spouse gets second and separate COA:
- Loss of household services
- Loss of sex
- Loss of society/companionship