Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
34 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Main principle of Tort Law
|
Everyone must in principle bear his own damage
|
|
Functions of tort law
|
1. Realisation of compensatory justice
2. Fair and efficient distribution of damage over society 3. Prevention of damage |
|
Compensatory / Retributive justice
|
Requires that the wrongdoer compensates the damage
= fault liability |
|
Fault liability
|
Somebody did something wrong / was at fault,
and thereby caused damage: must compensate |
|
Strict liability
|
Somebody is liable for a damage he did not cause.
Breakthrough in extra-contractual liability. |
|
Reasons for introducing strict liability
|
1. Fairness
2. Economic efficiency 3. Possibility to recover damages 4. Prevention |
|
Tortfeasor
|
A person who committed a tort
|
|
Grounds for tort liability / Three categories
|
1. Tortfeasor acted wrongfully
– fault liability 2. Sb. is liable for a damage that was wrongfully caused by a tortfesor – liability for a tortfeasor’s fault 3. Liability for damage caused by an animal or object for which the tortfeasor was responsible – strict liability |
|
Fault
|
1. Is a wrongful act
2. for which an agent can be blamed |
|
Tort law deals with cases in which
|
a victim suffered a damage and wants compensation
|
|
Questions in Tort law
|
1. Why the damage should be shifted?
2. Under what conditions should sb else compensate? 3. Which damages qualify? |
|
Negligence as a tort
|
- Person breached a legal duty to take care of other persons and their interests
- this breach resulted in damage to someone towards whom care was due |
|
Liability under the tort of negligence
/ 4 conditions – common law/ |
1. There was a duty of care
2. This duty was breached 3. There is damage 4. for which the tortfeasor is responsible |
|
Precautionary measure is required if
/common law/ |
Its costs are less than the costs of a possible accident
|
|
Learned Hand formula
|
Liability exists when
B < PL |
|
Conditions for fault liability
/civil law/ |
1. An act or an omission unlawfully violated a legally protected interest
2. Thereby causing damage of a type which qualifies for compensation |
|
Unlawful act or omission
/civil law / |
- Infringes a right, or
- Violates a legal duty, or - Violates an unwritten norm that specifies what is required in society unless there is a ground for justification |
|
Insolvency
|
Unable to meet debts or discharge liabilities; bankrupt
|
|
Adage
|
A saying that sets forth a general truth and that has gained credit through long use
|
|
Indemnify
|
To protect against damage, loss, or injury; insure
|
|
Cellar hatch
Precautionary measures – aspects |
- degree of probability that 1. the required attention and care could be disregarded and 2. that this might lead to accidents
- gravity of the consequences of such accidents - burden of adequate precautions |
|
Ex post determination
|
- for a particular case, only with an eye for the damages as they occurred
- best allocation of existing damages |
|
Ex ante determination
|
- best result for the given case and all similar future cases
- will no incorporate all the details of the present case - with an eye for future cases too - prevention |
|
Efficiency standard
|
The rule that allocates liability should be formulated in such a way that
- the total amount of the expected costs - for the potential tortfeasors and potential victims of damage - is made as small as possible - division between the parties is only relevant in this sense |
|
Vicarious liability
|
Employers’ liability for damages caused by their employees.
(Under certain circumstances – there exists a special relation at least in theory, that allows for influence over the tortfeasor’s behaviour) |
|
Basic requirements for vicarious liability
|
1. Employee was at fault
2. Employer had sufficient power of direction and control 3. Harm was caused in the course of employment |
|
Course of employment
/ one definition / |
Broadly comprises all acts done concomitantly to the accomplishment of the tasks which were entrusted to the employee.
|
|
Vicarious liability / Advantages
|
1. Victim is protected against insolvency (Deep pocket theory)
2. Employer benefits from the behaviour of the employee 3. Damages might not be bearable for the employees or the children |
|
Strict liability / Common feature
|
The person who becomes liable
is somehow responsible for or benefits from the fact that there is a possibility of faultless damages |
|
Strict liability / Criteria for defective products
|
1. more protection for the injured
2. incentive to improve safety 3. better options for insurance 4. fewer problems in determining liability – saving procedural costs |
|
Rules of Interpretation / Construction
|
1. Literal
2. Golden (unless absurdity/narrow, or against public policy/wide) 3. Mischief 4. Purposive approach 5. Teleological approach (spirit of the legislation) |
|
Rules of Language
|
1- Ejusdem generis
2- Noscitur a sociis 3- Expressio unius est exclusion alterius |
|
Dutch traffic liability
(Fault into a kind of strict) |
1. Burden of proof shifted
2. Limitation on what counts as a valid excuse |
|
Contributory negligence
|
The damage to the victim is not only caused by the damage-causing act or event, but also by the negligent or wrongful behaviour of the victim himself
|