Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
261 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
structuring and ordering persuasive mssgs
|
ciceros
|
|
ciceros five canons of rhetoric- rhetoric
|
the faculty of discovering all the available means of persuasion
|
|
ciceros five canons of rhetoric
|
dispositio, elocutio,inventio,memoria,pronuntiato
|
|
dispositio
|
the effective and orderly arrangement of ideas
|
|
elocutio
|
fluency and command of lang
|
|
inventio
|
the invention and discovery of arg
|
|
memoria
|
memory and mnemonic devices
|
|
pronunciato
|
delivery factors such as pitch, rate, voice quality
-quintilian |
|
explicit conclusions
|
-hard sell
-persuasive mssg comes directly from the speaker,there is less rick the listener will reach the wrong conclusion |
|
implicit conclusions
|
-soft sell
-persuasive mssg more subtl, source may seem less patronizing |
|
implicit conclusions are the best option when
|
-perussion is more participatory
-self generated conclusions are more palatable -there is less risk of psych reactance |
|
explicit conclusions are better when
|
-the listeners arent knowledgable about the issue\
-the mssg is complex or difficult to understand -the conclusions could b edasily misconstrued |
|
gain framed mssgs
|
-emphasize the positive
-ppl take more risk to avoid loss than to get gain |
|
loss-framed mssgs
|
-emphasize the negative
|
|
quality vs quantity of arguments-would you prefer buffet or fancy restaurant of persuasive mssgs-the role of reciever involvement in the elm
|
-for the receivers with low involvement it is the quantity of the arguments that count
-for recievers with high involvement it is the quality of arguments that matter |
|
evidence use
|
--almost always facilitates persuasion, evidene can increase speakers credibility
-evidence is most effective wen recievers have high involvement |
|
narrative use
|
-ppl generally prefer stories over statistics we are story tellers
-wen recievers do not pay close attention, narratives, ten to b more effective -anecdotal evidene is subj to hast generalizaiton fallacy |
|
repetition oand mere exposure
|
-mere exposure effect
-repeated exposure to a stimulus increases liking for the stimulus -repitition can increase awareness, learning, retention -wear-out can occur with over-exposure. especiall if mssgs is complex ex new coverage of prez candidates |
|
order effects
|
-anticlimax,pyramidal order, climax order
-reserach shows it is better to place your strongest arguments first or last -the worst approach is to put ur best arguments in the middle |
|
anticlimax order
|
-giving your best arg first
|
|
pyramidal order
|
-placing your best arg in the middle
|
|
climax order
|
saving your best arg for last
|
|
primacy effect
|
it is better to speak first if the speeches r back to back
-in live political debate speaking first would b an advantage |
|
recency effect
|
-it is better to speak last if the speeches r seperated in time
-in campaign ads shown a week apart appearing las would b an adv |
|
primary vs recency
|
-bland topics-recency effect
-intrigueing topics-primacy effect -chunked info -high involvement favors info that is clearly segmented -unchunked info-low involvment favors info that is uncategorized |
|
inoculation, mssg sideness, and forewarning
|
-how to prevent ppl from being persuaded ex.no monopoly in former soviet union
-inoculation theory |
|
inoculation theory
|
-a small dose of the opposing position increases ur resistance to the opposers persuasion
-inoculation is especially applicable to cultural truisms (beleifs we take for granted such as brush ur teeth before bed) -incoluation is less effective on controvrsial topics becasue -we expect alt views |
|
two sided mssgs vs one sided
|
-almost always more persuasive
exceptions r wen recievers -agree already,r easily confused, r uneducated or unintelligent,will not b exposed the opposing side later on |
|
forewarning
|
-forewarning ppl about persuasive mssgs increases their resistance to that mssg
-recievers adopt less receptive state of mind and recievers may prepare defenses and rehearse counter arguments -forewarnings effectiveness depens upon motivation and ability to disagree |
|
forewarning vs inoculation
|
-forewarning merely warns a listener of an impeding persuasive mssg
-inoculation includes acutal ex of the opposing arg |
|
pre giving
|
-favors and gifts create a sense of indebtedness
-returning favors is culturally universal -beware of unfair exchanges |
|
pregiving illustrations
|
-befriending ur neighbors
-political fabors-campaign contributions buy access to a politician if not votes -panhandling tour guides-volunteer directions to toursits then ask for a tip -pregiving in sales- a comp gives important clients free tix to a ball game |
|
y does pregiving work so wel
|
-the liking explanation
-the gratitude explanation -norm of reciprocity |
|
the liking explanation
|
-the pregiver is percieved as good and kind person
|
|
the gratitude
|
-the pregiver evokes good vibes
|
|
norm of reciprocity
|
-favors create a sense of indebtedness
-impression management -internalied social norm |
|
impression managment
|
-ppl want to maintain a positive image
|
|
internalized social norm
|
-repaying favors is the right thing to do
|
|
the foot in the door strategy
|
- a person who agrees to a small initial request more likely to comply with a subsequent larger request
-freedmans and frasers 1966 classic study |
|
freedman and frasers
|
-initial request
-follow-up request -results -why it works |
|
initial request
|
-houeswives were asked to display a small sign in their window tha tread b a safe driver
|
|
follow-up request
|
-housewives were later asked to display a large billboard that read drive carefully in the front yard
|
|
results
|
-76 percent of the FITD houseiwives
|
|
why it works
|
- bems self perception theory-ppl make our personalities based on our own behavior. when you comply to a small request you think your are altruistic and therefor eneed to comply again becasue its wat altruistic ppl do
|
|
key fitd strategy
|
-size of first request
-prosocial requests -external incentives -who makes the request -social labeling -who answers the door -time delay |
|
-size of first request
|
must b small enough to ensure complane but not so small as to appear trivial
|
|
-prosocial requests
|
the strategy works best with prosocial causes
|
|
external incentives
|
-there should b no external inducements such as payment or rewards
|
|
who makes the request
|
- the first and second requests need not b made by the same requester
|
|
social labeling
|
-positive labels help activate relevant attitudes
|
|
who answers the door
|
-ppl with high need for conssitencey r more suseptible
-ppl with high self clarity r more susceptible |
|
time delay
|
-a time delay between first and second requests activate relevant attitudes
|
|
the food in mouth strategy
|
-Acknowledging that one is in a good mood predisposes a person to be more agreeable when dealing with requestors.
|
|
the door in the face strategy
|
-A person is presented with an initial, large request which she/he is inclined to reject.
-The person thereby becomes more likely to acquiesce to a second, more reasonable request. -Cialdini & Ascani’s (1976) study: |
|
Cialdini & Ascani’s (1976) study:
|
initial request: college dorm residents were asked to donate one unit of blood every two months for a period of three years.
follow-up request: dorm residents were asked to give blood once, the next day. results: compliance for the DITF group was 49% |
|
theoretical explanation for ditf
|
-perceptual contrast phenomenon
The 2nd request seems much more reasonable by comparison. -reciprocal concessions The target perceives he/she is engaged in a bargaining situation. -self-presentation explanation The target doesn’t want to be perceived negatively by others. -social responsibility position We comply based on our own, internal standards -guilt-based explanation The target feels guilty for not being helpful. Note: at present, it isn’t clear which of these explanations best accounts for the research findings |
|
keys to the ditf strategy
|
size of request, prosocial requests, time delay, who makes the request, size of the follow up request, who answers the door
|
|
size of initial request
|
The 1st request must be large enough to be rejected, but not ludicrous.
|
|
prosocial request
|
the strategy works best with prosocial causes
|
|
time delay
|
the 2nd request must follow right after the first one
|
|
who makes the request
|
the first and second request msut b made by the same requester
|
|
size of the follow up request
|
the second request must b unambiguously smaller than the first
|
|
who answers the door
|
ditf works best with exchange oriented ppl
|
|
the thats not all tactic
|
-But wait, there’s more…”
-The “that’s not all strategy” sweetens the deal. -Free extras add perceived value to an offer. -“Order now, and I’ll throw in…” -Often combined with the scarcity principle. “The first 20 callers will also receive…” -Effectiveness is based on reciprocity and contrasting |
|
the lowball tactic or technique
|
-Lowballing involves making an offer that sounds too good to be true. There are, however, hidden “strings” attached.
-Once the consumer is psychologically committed, it is hard to back out. -A credit card has a low interest rate, but only for a few months. -fine print in a low airfare ad (“restrictions may apply”) -Effectiveness is based on psychological commitment and unfulfilled obligations |
|
the bait an switch tactic
|
-An offer is made that seems too good to be true.
-When the consumer tries to buy the low-priced item, the item is no longer available. -The strategy is common in retail sales. |
|
the disrupt then reframe strategy
|
Disrupting and reframing is a diversionary tactic.
People want to help but the price or effort of the request causes them to reject it. A quirky statement disrupts cognitive processing |
|
legitimizing paltry contributions
|
-he strategy preempts potential obj
the strategy induces guilt if the target declines -the stratey produces a large quantity of smaller donations -donors ten to give far more than a penny however, |
|
the fear then relief strategy
|
Similar to “good cop, bad cop: routine
Fear causes people to react with an “action plan”, once fear is relieved there is a period of relief, where we do mindless things, in this time people are more compliant. |
|
the happiness then disapointment strategy
|
-An emotional see-saw from good to bad also increases compliance.
-The sudden withdrawal of positive emotion disrupts cognitive processing. |
|
compliance gaining
|
chapter 11
|
|
actions speak louder than words defining compliance gaining
|
-a sub set of persuasion
-is intentional -focus on behavioral conformity not jsut thoughts -one of most important studiesof interpersoanl influence studies emphasize stratey eselectionand effectiveness -5 types of compliance gaining strategies |
|
five types of compliance gaining strategies
|
-rewarding activity
-punishing activity -expertise -activation of impersoanl commitments -activation of personal comitments |
|
mazxwell and schmits 16 strategy taxonomy
|
1. Promise of reward
2. Threat of punishment 3. Expertise (positive) 4. Expertise (negative) 5. Liking 6. Pregiving 7. Aversive stimulation 8. Debt 9. Moral appeal 10. Positive self-feeling 11. Negative self-feeling 12. Positive altercasting* 13. negative altercasting* 14. Altruism 15. Positive esteem 16. Negative esteem |
|
situational factors
|
compliance gaining depends on - dominance, intimacy, resistance, personal benefits, rights, reational consequences, apprehension
|
|
intimacy
|
level of emotional attatchment
|
|
resistance
|
-likelihood of resistance
|
|
personal benefits
|
self benefit vs other benefit
|
|
rights
|
extent to which a persuader thinks request is warranted
|
|
relational consequences
|
-potential for long term effects on the relationship
|
|
apprehension
|
wen persuaders percieves nervousness in the sitch
|
|
seeking compliance from stranger and intimates all used liking-interpersonal /long term
|
more positive strategies, esp. regarding healthy habits
used threats to get them to quit smoking less strategy variety greater message adaptation |
|
seeking compliance from stranger and intimates all used liking-interpersonal-short term
|
more positive strategies, esp. regarding healthy habits
less strategy variety greater message adaptation |
|
seeking compliance from stranger and intimates all used liking-noninterpersoanl-long term
|
greater strategy variety
less message adaptation, |
|
seeking compliance from stranger and intimates all used liking-noninterpersonal-short term
|
more negative strategies (threats)
greater strategy variety less message adaptation |
|
couplte types
|
-traditionals
-seperates -independents |
|
traditionals
|
-hold conventional relationship values (stability, not spontaneity)
-exhibit more interdependence (physically & psychologically) - avoid conflict |
|
seperated
|
-hold ambivalent views of relationships
-exhibit the least interdependence -avoid open marital conflict |
|
independents
|
-hold nonconventional relationship values
-exhibit moderate interdependence, but not in - -physical/temporal aspects of their lives -Are more assertive when engage in some conflict |
|
compliance gaining for certain couples
|
-traditionals
-seperates independents |
|
traditionals
|
discussed potential positive/negative outcomes of a course of action. Were open & used relationship as a basis of power.
|
|
seperates
|
didn’t identify with their partner or use relationship to gain compliance. Focused on negative consequences on non-compliance & tried to constrain the behavior of their spouses
|
|
independents
|
use a wide variety of power bases for compliance. They discounted & refuted their partners more. They debate each other intensely
|
|
when trying to sabe a relationship
|
-commitment
-allignment -negativity -harm |
|
commitment
|
being loving & submissive; “I’ll do anything”
|
|
alignment
|
Alignment- demonstrating that your partner is taken
|
|
negativity
|
degrading your partner, making partner jealous, concealing your partner from others
|
|
harm
|
Harm- threatening or being violent someone who may come between you & your partner, or your partner
|
|
power, legitimacy and politeness
|
-power helps determine which compiance gaining strategy you choose to implement
-reward power,coercive, expert, legitimate, referent |
|
reward power
|
Based on the ability to confer benefits, used when the compliance seeker has control over valued resources
|
|
coercive power
|
Based on the ability to inflict punishments or impose penalties
|
|
expert power
|
Based on perceived knowledge, expertise
|
|
legitimate power
|
Based on official rank, formal standing. (VP of a company)
|
|
referent power
|
Based on admiration, respect, regard (mentor, celebrity)
|
|
politeness theory
|
face refers to a persons self-image
-positive face-wen others like and or respect and approve of us -negative face-our sense of freedom or autonomy -wen making or declining a request both faces may b ttack |
|
persuaders and persuadees face need are
|
-interdependant
-A source must adapt a message to a targets’ face needs. -Threats to another’s face tend to decrease compliance. -What about compliance between doctor & patient? -Compliance based on similarity, expression of concern, there are gender differences |
|
individual characteristics and compliance gaining behavior
|
-expressive design logic
-conventional design logic -rhetorical design logic |
|
expressive design logic
|
People who think communication is their chance to express how they think and feel without regard to appropriateness
|
|
conventional design logic
|
People who think communication is a game played cooperatively according to social norms. They express thoughts & feelings in an appropriate way.
|
|
rhetorical design logic
|
People who think communication’s purpose is to negotiate character, attitude, & selves. Every action has a purpose and an end goal. These people are proactive & use rational arguments.
|
|
probs facing compliance research
|
-Marwell & Schmitt (1967) had 16 typologies.
-Wiseman & Schenck-Hamlin (1981) criticized it for being created from previous theory instead of from real people -They tested participants by giving them scenarios & asked how they would respond-thus 14 strategies -Typology development became popular, Kellermann & Cole (1994) created 64 -Then they said typologies should be scrapped & research should focus on features of compliance gaining messages. |
|
the study compliance gaining goals
|
dillard (2004,2008) created goals-plans-action theory
-primary goals- to influence another person. An employee wants a pay raise. -secondary goal-influence people’s goals in compliance gaining situations The employee doesn’t want to work more hours. -identity goals -interaction goals -Resource goals -Arousal goals -Plans- |
|
identity goals
|
identity goals- maintaining your morals
|
|
interaction goals
|
- creating a good impression/behaving
|
|
Resource goals
|
maintaining relationship & increasing personal reward
|
|
Arousal goals
|
maintaining levels of arousal (keeping nervousness low)
|
|
Plans
|
The employee provides evidence demonstrating his/her higher productivity compared to other employees.
|
|
dillards goals, plans, action model
|
-5 typesof secondary goals
-identity -interaction -relational resource -persoanl resource -affect managment |
|
-identity
|
Goals consistent with one’s own character
|
|
-interaction
|
Goals regarding facework, impression management
|
|
-relational resource
|
Goals involving relationship maintenance
|
|
persoanl resource
|
Goals to improve one’s own assets or standing
|
|
-affect managment
|
Goals about managing one’s mood, emotions
|
|
Iconicity
|
An image stands for the thing it represents (icon).
Uncle Sam is an icon for America. |
|
Indexicality
|
-Images documenting events.
-Marines raising the flag on Iwo Jima, landing on the moon -Advertisers associate brands with idealized lifestyles. -LANDING ON THE MOON -Syntactic Indeterminancy- |
|
Syntactic Indeterminancy-
|
images lack logical operators, pics can’t convey “if-then” or cause-effect relationships
|
|
Art as Persuasion
|
Art used to further political/religious ends
Art provides social critiques. Art can spark controversy. Art increases awareness. Controversial Art danish, obama -Bansky-Dorothy- art increases awareness by changing the conversation -Art to increase awareness -Lacy-3 Days in May -Art increases awareness through participation -Bilal- “Domestic Tension” -The AIDS Memorial Quilt- the Names Project |
|
Socialist Realism-
|
-when Soviet Union declared all art to be to be subservient to the state. Art used as political propaganda
|
|
Cinematic Persuasion-
|
-They have potential for mass suggestion
-Movies are told in a narrative form. |
|
Movies are told in a narrative form.
|
-As stories which possess an aura of believability.
-When people watch a movie they don’t expect to be persuaded, they expect to be entertained- their guard is down -Some films persuade intentionally or unintentionally. i.e. Crash (intentional) & Juno (unintentional) |
|
Acting Out
|
-Cinema depicts Western values around the globe, some people/countries aren’t too thrilled with values portrayed
-Movie characters model risky behaviors. -Positive social modeling -Social Cognitive Theory- -Cultivation theory- |
|
Movie characters model risky behaviors.
|
-Alcohol abuse- Movies depict underage drinking and driving.
-Unsafe sex- 98% of movies with sex scenes make no mention of safe sex (Gunasekera & Chapman, 2005). -Violence- Gratuitous violence is commonplace on the Big Screen. |
|
Positive social modeling
|
*Finding Nemo normalized disabilities
*Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner tackled the subject of racial integration. *Tomb Raider, the Terminator films, Resident Evil, and other films portray smart, tough, empowered female protagonists. |
|
Social Cognitive Theory-
|
teens observe behaviors that are modeled in media & then imitate those behaviors. i.e. Project X parties
|
|
Cultivation theory-
|
the violence people watch, the more they think the world is mean & scary
|
|
Promoting popular culture
|
-Fashion
-Hairstyles -Dance -Lifestyles -Slang and expressions -Stories in film overlap with viewers’ experience. Viewers may identify closely with a character. Rocky, Rudy, |
|
Product placement
|
-Apple has placed its products in more than 1,500 TV shows.
-James Bond movies always feature a cool car. -Windex was the cure for everything in My Big Fat Greek Wedding. -Brandchannel.com lists product placements in movies. |
|
product placement
|
How much?
Who pays? Visual Extravaganza: Anti-advertising (sub-vertising): Image-based advertising: Shock ads |
|
how much?
|
We see approx. 3,000 ads a day. At a cost of $200 billion per year spent on advertising/ $800 per person in U.S./$40 per person in all other countries combined
|
|
Who pays?
|
20-40% of our money paid for goods/services goes to advertising.
|
|
Visual Extravaganza:
|
advertisers use vivid/intense images to break through media clutter
|
|
Anti-advertising (sub-vertising):
|
commercials catered to people who distrust media & ads. Meant for a generation to hip to stoop to persuasive commercials.
Ex: anti-smoking commercial w/ cowboy |
|
Image-based advertising:
|
companies creating positive associations between their products and an idealized lifestyle. Ex: BP, luxury clothing, cars
|
|
Shock ads:
|
sell products by being edgy & in your face.
Jetta “Safe Happens” PETA Reebok 50 cent “I am what I am |
|
Photo Journalism as Persuasion
|
The myth of photographic objectivity
-Photographers manipulate |
|
The myth of photographic objectivity
|
Photographs are not objective representations of reality.
Photography is a subjective medium |
|
-Photographers manipulate
|
the subject matter
framing perspective lighting composition film (color, black & white) camera angle focus contrast which images to print cropping shutter speed |
|
subliminal influence
|
People believe subliminal messages are popular in advertising, but they are not. They only appear as isolated pranks. Some Disney movies show images embedded in scenes.
|
|
What Makes a Message Subliminal?
|
-Sub=below the threshold
-Limen= human conscious -An image that is flashed quickly is not subliminal, it’s supraliminal |
|
Types of Subliminal Stimuli
|
Embedded images:
Sub-audible messages: Electronically altered signals |
|
embeddeed images
|
pictures or words that are hidden or flashed quickly (in 100ths of a second)
|
|
sub-audible mssgs
|
sounds or words that are too faint to be heard, or are played at extremely high frequencies
|
|
electronically altered signals
|
backward masking and other voice alterations
|
|
The early years: An urban myth is born
|
-James Vicary claimed to have flashed the words “eat popcorn” and “Drink Coca-Cola” on a movie screen.
-He claimed popcorn sales increased 58% and Coke sales increased 18%. -Vicary’s experiment was never successfully replicated. -He later acknowledged the study was a hoax. |
|
The Middle Years: Looking Harder, Finding Little
|
more studies focused on imbedded images, imbedded images did not increase sales.
|
|
Subliminal Priming
|
subliminal stimuli can alter attitudes, emotions, & behavior in 3 steps
-results People who were primed with the word ‘salt’ recognized the word ‘pepper’ faster than people not primed with the word ‘salt’ |
|
3 steps
|
1. people view a masked prime #### (a string of characters covering a word)
2. the mask is removed & people view the prime (i.e. the word ‘salt’ would appear for .30 milliseconds 3. a target word is presented to cause you to think of the prime word (i.e. pepper). |
|
Limitations of Subliminal Priming
|
The subliminal messages with results were conducted in highly controlled labs
|
|
Sub-audible Messages
|
-Subliminal self-help tapes; lower blood pressure, overcome fears, improve memory, lose weight
-There is no evidence that subliminal self-help tapes work, but the belief that they do does -placebo effect -What Advertisers Really Do -Neurolinguistic Programming |
|
-placebo effect
|
1 study gave participants 2 self-help tapes (1 to increase self-esteem & 1 to improve memory). The labels were switched, but people still believed they had increased in self-esteem or memory
|
|
What Advertisers Really Do
|
-Products go with favorable images & idealized lifestyles.
-15-30 products are inserted every 30 min on TV |
|
Neurolinguistic Programming
|
-Claims to improve sleep, depression, memory
-Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) is a mix of linguistics (words), psychology, & hypnotism…no evidence for it -a person’s unconscious mind determines how they’ll act by activating their primary representational system (PRS),which is reflected in the 5 senses. |
|
Sat-Music as persuasion
|
-50% of TV and radio commercials include some form of music.
-Background music may enhance mood -Music in advertising and sales -Mere exposure effect- -Music as a mnemonic device |
|
Music in advertising and sales
|
Music reinforces a brand’s image. Chevy “like a Rock…”
|
|
Mere exposure effect-
|
McD’s “You deserve a break today…”
|
|
Music as a mnemonic device
|
State Farm “Like a good neighbor……is there”
|
|
Background music
|
affects the pace of shopping behavior. i.e. elevator music, enhances customers’ moods,
can improve task performance. |
|
weaponizing music
|
-Interrogations have used music to weaken suspect’s resolve
--------------Barney the Dinosaur songs were used as a form o f “torture-lite.” -Music has been used to deter loiterers ------Barry Manilow music was played to discourage -------teens from loitering in a park at night |
|
Aroma and persuasion
|
-Smell is the one sense you can’t turn off.
-Smell and Communication Research Few texts or articles on the role of fragrance by communication scholars -Smell is rarely viewed as symbol usage. -Smell and “real world” persuasion perfumes, fragrance inserts air fresheners cleaners, deodorizers ambient aromas |
|
The human olfactory system
|
-Smell is our most primitive sense.
-Smell is part of the limbic system (emotional center of the brain). -The nasal passage is “hard-wired” to the brain. -People have poor smell vocabularies. -Scents are often defined in terms of other senses (e.g., sweet, smoky, nutty, fruity) |
|
The role of smell in human relationships
|
-By 4-6 weeks, infants can discriminate between their mother’s scent and a stranger’s (Russell, 1976; -Schleidt & Genzel, 1990).
-There are important cultural differences in smell, body odor. -Almost everyone has experienced a situation in which a smell evoked a nostalgic memory. -Preferences for smells are highly idiosyncratic, or individualized. -There is probably no universal agreement on what smells good or bad. ---------Americans’ disdain for body odor ---------Cow dung as a hair care product in Africa -Culture and social conditioning teach individuals what smells to like or dislike. -----Liver and onions, meat cooking, ethnic foods ------Gender and smell: a double standard? |
|
The fragrance industry
|
-The fragrance industry nets $20 billion annually.
-Naming or labeling a smell affects how the smell is perceived. hence the sensual, exotic names given to perfumes -The attractiveness of the container affects the perceived pleasantness of the smell. -The fragrance industry is selling romance. marketing themes associated with fragrances revolve around images of romance, intrigue, sensuality, sexiness. |
|
Fragrances and persuasion
|
-No clear consensus on whether fragrances increase attraction or arousal
at best, scent is only part of the attraction equation -Fragrance as a peripheral cue--may reinforce, alter, enhance affective responses positive or negative mood states recall of memories, experiences |
|
scents and persuasion
|
-Aromas and moral behavior
-Helping behavior -Driving behavior -Medical applications of aroma |
|
Aromas and moral behavior
|
(Liljenquist, Zhong, & Galinsky, 2009) People were more fair and charitable in a clean-smelling environment
|
|
Helping behavior
|
Baron (1997) Shoppers at a mall were more than twice as likely to help a stranger in the presence of pleasant odors like roasting coffee or baking cookies.
|
|
Driving behavior
|
Baron & Kalsher (1998) Driving performance was significantly improved in the fragrance condition
|
|
Medical applications of aroma
|
(Jellinek, 1994) pleasant aromas can reduce anxiety and stress associated with medical tests MRIs, CAT scans, etc.
|
|
Caveats & qualifications
|
-Smells are subjective:
-Fragrances can backfire. |
|
-Smells are subjective:
|
- People don’t always agree on what smells good (liver & onions?).
-People may become desensitized to, or over sensitized, to smells. |
|
Fragrances can backfire.
|
Job applicants whose resumes were fragranced were less likely to be called for an interview (Sczesny & Stahlberg, 2002).
|
|
is persuasion in general unethical
|
negative stereotypes
idealistic view feminist view -Note, that all of these views are persuasive in and of themselves. -A person who is attempting to convince others that persuasion is unethical is persuading. |
|
neg stereotypes
|
persuasion as “sophistry,” including deceit, beguilement, trickery
|
|
idealistic view
|
persuasion as “manipulation,” getting others to do our bidding
|
|
feministi view
|
persuasion as a “masculine,” “patriarchal” practice
|
|
Ethics, culture, & central vs. peripheral processing
|
Central processing is based on:
Peripheral processing is based on: |
|
Central processing is based on:
|
-thought, reflection, deliberation
-scrutiny of message content -high level of receiver involvement |
|
Peripheral processing is based on:
|
-mental shortcuts such as credibility, images, ----appearance-based cues
-emotional processing -low level of receiver involvement |
|
Ethical questions that can’t be answered
|
-In controversial issues the study of persuasion can’t tell you what side of the fence to be on or what means are bad/good…so researchers look to religious leaders, moral philosophers, & the judicial system
|
|
Approaches to Ethics
|
Consequentialism/ teleological ethics:
Situational ethics/relativism: Universalism: Egalitarianism: Free market ethics: Utilitarianism: |
|
Consequentialism/ teleological ethics:
|
emphasizes consequences
|
|
Situational ethics/relativism:
|
no moral absolutes, good & bad forms of persuasion depend on the situation & the people involved
|
|
Universalism:
|
there are universal do’s and don’t’s
|
|
Egalitarianism:
|
golden rule
|
|
Free market ethics:
|
based on capitalism, caveat emptor (let the buyer beware)
|
|
Utilitarianism
|
based on the greatest good for the greatest # of people. i.e. balancing the needs of many w/ the needs of one.
|
|
Characteristics of Ethical Influence
|
Intentionality:
Conscious awareness: Free choice, free will: Language & symbolic action: |
|
Intentionality
|
some say only intentional attempts count as persuasion
|
|
Conscious awareness:
|
when all parties are aware of persuasion attempts is much more ethical (pure vs. borderline persuasion)
|
|
Free choice, free will:
|
some borderline persuasion involves coercive strategies=unethical
|
|
Language & symbolic action:
|
persuasion is used through verbal/print words & symbolic actions such as protests
|
|
Persuaders as Lovers
|
-Brockriede’s types of arguers
-seducers -rapists -bunglers -smugglers -sleuths ethical influence -repect -equality -tolerance |
|
seducers
|
use charm deception, flattery, beguilement
|
|
rapists
|
use force, coercion, threats, ultimatums
|
|
bunglers
|
squander their prospects for influence by choosing ineffective methods
|
|
smugglers
|
know what they’re doing & rely on unethical means
|
|
slueths
|
like detectives; will analyze persuasive strategies
|
|
respect
|
Reaffirming the other’s self worth
Treating another with dignity |
|
equality
|
Equal status, shared goals
|
|
tolerance
|
Respecting differences of opinion
Remaining open to new ideas |
|
Ethics & Communicator Characteristics
|
-What ethical guidelines should be followed when attempting to persuade highly vulnerable audiences?
Children Elderly Poor, inner-city residents Immigrants, non-English speakers |
|
Ethics & Fear Appeals
|
Glassner at USC, claims Americans are bombarded with fear appeals.
Fear of terrorism National health insurance and “death panels” Fear of immigrants taking jobs, jobs being outsourced overseas Fear of crime, violence Fear of lack of health care coverage Scary diseases |
|
When is banning persuasion ethical
|
-Should some forms of persuasion be banned?
Hate speech? Cyber-bullying? KKK rallies? Abortion clinic protestors? -is there a right to avoid influence attempts? Telemarketing Spam Aggressive panhandling |
|
Is the use of coercion ever be ethically justified
|
A child is forced to get a vaccination by his or her parents
a psychotic or delusional person is forcibly restrained so he/she won’t harm him/her self or someone else the “ticking bomb” scenario: using torture to save lives? |
|
Alcohol advertising in the inner city
|
-African-American communities are targeted by the alcohol and tobacco industry.
-Billboards: 55%-58% of inner city billboards carried cigarette and/or alcohol ads compared to only 34% in more affluent areas. -Magazine ads: Black youths were exposed to 66% more beer and ale ads and 81% more distilled spirits magazine advertisements in 2002. -Radio ads: Blacks youths heard 12% more beer advertising and 56% more ads for distilled spirits than non-African-American youth. |
|
Marketing alcohol to underage drinkers
|
-On average, young people view 2,000 beer and wine commercials per year.
-Alcohol ads outnumber anti-drinking ads by 50 to 1. -The Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth (CAMY) found that alcohol ads aired on 13 of the 15 most popular teen shows |
|
Common criticisms of advertisers/marketers
|
-Advertising makes us believe there is a quick fix for life’s problems.
-Advertising panders to our desires for things that are bad for us. -Common responses to criticisms |
|
Common responses to criticisms
|
-Consumer stupidity is not the fault of advertising.
-Economic Darwinism: bad products won’t survive no matter how good the advertising. -The FCC and other watchdog groups already regulate advertising. |
|
Advertising and body image
|
Media depictions of the ideal female body type create body dissatisfaction and eating disorders in women.
today's models generally weigh 23% less than the average woman. the average American model is 5'11" tall and weighs 117 pounds. the average American woman is 5'4" tall and weighs 140 pounds. |
|
Motivational Appeals
|
Definition: “external inducements, often of an emotional nature, which are designed to increase an individual's drive to undertake some course of action" (Gass & Seiter, 2011).
-External inducement -Motivational appeals |
|
External inducement
|
incentive separate from the substance of the message itself
|
|
-Motivational appeals
|
: attempts to jump start someone’s drive to do something. External incentive for performing an action
|
|
What are motivational appeals
|
-extrinsic motivation
-intrinsic motivation |
|
extrinsic motivation
|
(instilled by outside factor) vs.
i.e. working for food/bills “working to live |
|
intrinsic motivation
|
(drive that comes from within)
i.e. working b/c it satisfies your need for conquest & to feel in charge “living to work” |
|
Logical versus emotional appeals
|
-Aristotle classified these 2 appeals as separate influences. Studies suggest there is a fuzzy distinction
-Pathos is based on passion & emotion. -However…people aren’t strictly rational. When people agree with a message, they believe it is more logical and “rational.” when they disagree with a message, they think it is more “emotional.” |
|
XX-Logical versus emotional appeals: A false dichotomy
|
The copier study
For smaller requests, the appearance of reason giving is sufficient. For larger requests, actual reasons are more effective. |
|
types of motivational appeals
|
fear
guilt pity sympathy loyalty generosity devotion kindness compassion dedication patriotism pride honor sex love hope |
|
Fear Appeals
|
-What fear appeals did our parents raise us with?
Fear Level or Intensity: The Goose bump Factor Mild fear appeals are more effective, however, researchers agree that the relationship between fear intensity & persuasion is positive & linear The more fear you feel, the more vulnerable you are |
|
The Extended Parallel Processing Model
|
-Kim Witte's EPPM - an appeal arouses fear, the receiver can do 2 things; engage in danger control or fear control
-danger control -fear control -perceived efficacy is crucial for actual efficacy |
|
danger control
|
The receiver concentrates on ways of reducing the danger.
|
|
fear control
|
The receiver focuses on fear itself, and becomes anxious, panicky.
Effective fear appeals trigger danger control, rather than fear control. |
|
perceived efficacy is crucial for actual efficacy
|
-The receiver thinks the recommended action is perceived as both effective and feasible to avoid the danger.
-response efficacy -self efficacy |
|
response efficacy
|
“It will work.” when the person thinks an effective response is available for them to utilize
|
|
self efficacy
|
“I can do this.” when the person realizes that they can carry out the action available to them
|
|
Appeals to Pity & Guilt 274
|
-Jerry Lewis & MDA Telethon story p.274
-Can we fundraise for charities for people in need without using pity/guilt? -Eayres & Ellis (1990) showed participants posters of children with disabilities. Some posters showed children in a positive light, some posters showed children in need. Participants were more willing to donate when a child was portrayed in need. -Feelings of guilt increase compliance. What may we feel guilty about? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM7Vfe0UJ-E PEDIASURE Read Funeral Home Persuasion Box 13.1 p.275 People’s emotional reactions to others’ stigmas depends on if the stigma was controllable or not (drugs, obesity, AIDS |
|
Sat-Humorous Appeals
|
-Humor is in 21-48% of advertising. 1 in 5 commercials contains humor
-Humor can consist of a pun, satire, anecdote, innuendo, irony, metaphor, slapstick, jokes, or self-disparaging humor 1. Humor captures attention 2. Humor is a distraction; 3. Humor increases liking |
|
Humor captures attention
|
& breaks through media clutter, & functions as a peripheral cue.
|
|
Humor is a distraction;
|
Smiling or laughing disrupts cognitive processing & suppresses critical thinking. Participants who listened to late night comedians (i.e. Leno/Letterman) were less likely to scrutinize important statements they made
|
|
Humor increases liking
|
; makes persuader seem friendlier & reduces psychological reactance.
Related humor (is within message), unrelated (humor offered in a stand-alone act). Humor increases trustworthiness, but decreases perceived competence. Also read Humor as Social Proof |
|
Pride and Patriotism
|
-Flag waving works-patriotic ploys work when used effectively. i.e. candidates standing next to veterans, Pres. Obama scrutinized for not wearing a pin flag on his lapel
-Seiter & Gass (2005) compared tips between waiters who wrote ‘United We Stand’ vs. ‘Have a Nice Day’…United won -Caveats |
|
Caveats
|
Pandering to patriotism may backfire. Campaigns work as long as it doesn’t seem as though the company is ‘cashing in’
|
|
For Mature Audiences
|
-Grand theft auto & sex appeal to younger kids
-The use of overt sex appeal has increased considerably -Half of all print ads depict women as sex objects. Brooks Shields was 15 when she appeared in Calvin Klein jean’s ads. The Miller Lite “catfight” commercial featured two busty women wrestling. Paris Hilton was scantily clad in a Carl’s Jr. commercial. Males are increasingly being objectified as well. Sex in the City The Cougar Desperate Housewives |
|
How Sex Sells
|
-Sex appeals serve as peripheral cues
-Sex appeals use"post hoc“ reasoning -Caveats & Cautions |
|
-Sex appeals serve as peripheral cues
|
Meant to invoke an emotional response from viewer
|
|
Sex appeals use"post hoc“ reasoning
|
If you use product X you will be more sexy.
If you use product X, other sexy people will be attracted to you |
|
Caveats & Cautions
|
Resentment; sexual stimuli are used in ads for women, but if perceive the ads as sexist, then the ad will backfire.
Backlash- Carl’s Jr. advertisements were highly scrutinized. Sex appeals don’t work in the professional field Distraction- if sex appeal is too overt, people may not notice what product the appeal is meant to be promoting |
|
Warmth Appeals
|
-Aaker & Stayman (1990): more than 1 in 5 prime-time commercials include warmth.
-Services: State Farm, "Like a good neighbor..." Food: Pillsbury Doughboy, “Nothing says lovin’ like something from the oven” Products: Snuggles fabric softener Restaurants: Olive Garden, “When you’re here, you’re family.” real-estate terminology: Remax rustic cozy charming |
|
Warmth in face to face compliance gaining
|
-sales
-immdediacy behaviors |
|
sales
|
Car sales (calling customer by first name, establishing rapport)
food-servers (smiling, introducing oneself by name, touch) smiley faces on receipts |
|
immediacy behaviors
|
hugging
smiling nodding approval pat on the back |
|
Ingratiation
|
-Types of Ingratiatory Behavior-using flattery as a motivational inducement
-other enhancement -opinion conformity -self-presentation |
|
other enhancement
|
paying compliments, engaging in flattery
the 3rd party strategy: “Gus said you are his favorite teacher!” |
|
opinion conformity
|
agreeing with another's opinions and statements
initially disagree, then yield, strategy: “Now that I think about it, you’re right.” |
|
self-presentation
|
self-promotion, bragging or self-aggrandizement
example: "I wish I could play golf with you, but I'm helping at the homeless shelter this weekend." |
|
How does ingratiation work
|
-liking
-similarity -social labeling |
|
liking
|
: ingratiatory behavior tends to increase liking, attraction, & perceived competence
|
|
similarity
|
ingratiatory behavior tends to increase perceptions of similarity, perceived commonality.
|
|
social labeling
|
the target tends to “live up to” the positive label bestowed on him/her.
|
|
Techniques for effective ingratiation
|
Brown-Nosing 101
Make the praise credible. Praise an attribute about which the target is insecure. Be discerning. Make sure the praise is not merely seen as normative. Avoid the negative effects of praise. |
|
Mixed Emotions
|
Other appeals; honor, youth, beauty, shame, freedom, environment. Almost any human drive can be used as an appeal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_vVUIYOmJM FotoShop good cop/ bad cop; threat + promise guilt + pity; for charities sex + pity; (Penthouse and PETA ads) |