• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Why do we suppose a probational period in Adam's obedience?
God might have justly always held Adam under the natural relationship of original righteousness - and Adam's holiness being mutable, his blessedness would always have hung in suspense.

temporal probation was accepted, in place of an everlasting exposure to a fall under the perpetual legal demand.

R.L. Dabney, 302
In the covenant of works was life the natural reward of obedience?
the reward for the probationary obedience while a reward for right works, was far more liberal then the works entitled to; and this was an adoption of life, transferring man from the position of a servant to that of a son, and surrounding him forever with the safeguards of the divine wisdom and faithfulness, making his holiness indefectable.

R.L. Dabney, 302.
What do we make of the fact that man is not capable of fulfilling the covenant of works?
For the reason that life cannot (now), in fact, be gained through that covenant (of works), is not that it was not truly promised to man in it, and in good faith; but that man has now become through he fall, morally incapable of fulfilling the conditions.

R.L. Dabney, 304
Was the command to "not eat of the fruit" the only one by the breach of which Adam could fall?
No, all the moral law know to Adam is represented in this command as the crucial test of his obedience to all. The condition of the covenant was perfect compliance, in heart and act, with all of God's revealed law.

R.L. Dabney, 305
Why is it supposed that an obedience for a limited time would have concluded the Covenant transaction?
A covenant with an indefinite probation would have been no covenant at all... the creatures state would have been still forever mutable... [and] rightly called desperate...

When Christ tells the young ruler - if thou will enter into life keep the commandment - he implies that the probation would have been temporary.

Adam's representative character unavoidably implies that the probation was temporary.

R.L. Dabney 305