• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
The Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Exclusionary Rule
provides that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is ordinarily inadmissible in a criminal trial.
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine
any evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search or seizure is tainted and inadmissible in a criminal trial.
Two Requirements
Police must generally obtain a search warrant in order to search areas in which the suspect has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Warrant must be supported by probable cause.
Key to the fourth amendment and searches
A warrant is only needed to search those areas in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Vernonia V. Actin
Court upheld school district’s testing procedure by applying a balancing test.
Balancing Test as applied to Vernonia V. Acton
Weighed the student’s privacy interests against government’s need for testing.
Privacy Interest Vernonia V. Acton
Few activities more private than urinating.

Monitoring of the event is degrading and embarrassing.

Chemical analysis of urine reveals much more than just drug use (pregnant, diabetic, epileptic…)

Interferes with privacy right to control one’s own medical treatment.

Regulates “off the field” conduct and thus violates a person’s privacy.