• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/48

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

48 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Rule of Capture
Applies to water, oil, gas
- You get what you drill, even if depletes others
- Doesn’t Apply to:
1 – negligently drained oil/gas (blowout)
2 – Illegally drained oil/gas (against Railroad Commission)
3 – stored gas = personal property
Which estate is dominant? Surface or mineral?
Mineral = dominant estate
Surface = serviant
As a mineral interest owner, what rights?
1 – right to explore, produce and develop minerals
2 – right to vote surface estate as reasonably necessary to develop minerals
3 – right to lease minerals
4- right to develop oil/gas yourself w/o leasing
5 – no duty to develop land/minerals
If O grants an oil and gas lease to Big Oil, what does he receive in return?
Bonus, Royalties, Delay Rentals
When must Mineral owner accommodate Surface owner?
1 – S owner has preexisting use of the surface
2 – M owner has a reasonable alterative method of developing oil/gas which is less destructive of the existing surface use but is still economical to M
3 – reasonable alternative is available ON the land (eg, can’t force slantwell)
How long does an oil/gas deed/lease last?
Is determinable – can last forever but may expire if there is no production for X # of years
O conveys Blackacre to X reserving “1/2 of all oil and gas royalties.” What do O and X own?
O = NPRI
X = Fee Simple determinable with mineral estate burdened by an NPRI
5 Kinds of Trespass in Oil/Gas and their Remedies
1 – ordinary trespass (lease expires = Injunction and damages
2 – Slant well drilling = Injuction and damages
3 – Geophysical or seismic trespass = Sue in assumpsit
4 – Damage to the speculative lease value (showing that land not worth anything, loss of bonus) = Lost bonus
5 – fracturing a well = Injunction and damages
Is authorized secondary recovery operation a trespass?
No, public policy favors recovering more o/g BUT can maybe sue for damages
Slander of Title
1 – publication of false claim to title of property
2 – done with malice
3 – resulting in rightful owner losing *specific* sale or lease opportunity b/c no buyer wanted a lawsuit w/ slandering party
What damages for trespass?
If bad faith = all losses, no credit for costs
If good faith = credit for reasonable costs that *benefited* rightful owner
General rule for Adverse Possession for Minerals
If AP for unsevered estate = gets minerals
If AP of severed surface estate = no minerals
General rule of Cotenancy
Every cotenant can drill and produce or lease his undivided share w/o consent but must account to others for their share of profits
Proportionated reduction clause
“If lessor owns an interest less than he has conveyed, royalties and rentals to Lessor reduced proportionately.”
- traditionally Lessor conveys full rights even when only owns portion
Mother Hubbard Clause
“Lease also covers and includes all land owned by Lessor adjacent to land described above”
- purpose is to pick up land from mistakes in survey or AP over few inches, etc.
Habendum Clause
“This lease remains in effect for __ yrs and as long thereafter as o/g is being produced”
What typical lease clause would save a lease when no production b/c no pipeline?
Shut-in Gas Royalty Clause – pay per well per month royalty = constructive production
Production in Paying Quantities
Determines whether oil producing enough to keep lease in effect
- Revenues – Lessor’s Property – Operating costs
Marginal well doctrine
Whether a reasonably prudent operator would continue to operate well to make profit, not just speculation
- Ct gives well reasonable amount of time to demonstrate profitability as long as is producing SOME o/g
Temporary Cessation of Production Doctrine
Keeps lease in effect after temporary shutdown
1 – short, temporary shutdown
2 – lessee acts diligently to fix
3 – due to mechanical breakdown “or like”
- maybe any reasonably prudent biz decision
What are the 2 equitable inroads to the courts usual strict construction of “production in paying quantities” under the habendum clause?
1 – marginal well doctrine
2 – TCOP – temporary cessation of production doctrine
Delay Rental Clause
If operations are not commenced before X date, lease terminates UNLESS Lessee pays rentals to delay drilling
Late Delay Rentals
If Lessee doesn’t pay rentals, lease automatically terminates
BUT if Lessor accepts late payment, lessor is estopped from denying validity of lease
If Lessor assigns 1/2 of rights to 3rd party w/o notice to Lessee, and Lessee delivers late delay rentals to Original Lessor, does that revive lease as to 3P?
No, they are now cotenants.
What is needed to have “commercial drilling”?
1 – objective physical acts
2 – subjective good faith intent
Pooling clause
Allows Lessee to hold several tracks under lease w/ production of just 1 well
- the 1/8 royalty is split among tract owners based on acreage pooled
- Lessee can pool all or any acreage under lease
- keeps lease alive for ALL land on lease
General Rule for Pooling and NPRIs
Executive Right Owner (mineral estate owner w/ right to lease) has no power to pool *Nonparticipating* interests
- so NPRIs get no royalties from pooling well if not on property
What can an NPRI do if land is pooled?
Can ratify K and get share of royalties (would get NPRI interest x royalty x percentage of pooled land)
5 Basics Rules of Divison Order Act
- applies to D/O executed after 8/26/91
1 – D/O are binding until revoked
2 – D/O can never contraict or change lease or relieve express/implied obligations
3 – D/O can clarify royalty settlement
4 – Lessee/Payor owing royalties can withhold payments w/o interest ONLY
- there is title dispute
- payee refuses to sign standard D/O
5 – Lessee/Payor has no right to w/hold payments b/c Lessor refuses to sign D/O w/o authorized standard items
General Rule on D/O
D/O is binding until revoked and it can clarify methods of paying royalty but it is not binding to extent changes or contradicts lease
“Standard” items on D/O
1 – effective date of D/O
2 – description of property
3 – fractional or decimal interest and types of interests (mineral, royalty) claimed by payee, w/ title assurances
4 – authority to suspend payments for title disputes
5- provisions for valuation of settlements to the payee
General Rule for Implied Covenants
O/G lease contains implied covenants that lessee act as reasonably prudent operator
*NOT a fiduciary standard owed to lessor
Implied Covenant to Protect Against Drainage
There must be
1 – substantial drainage (by another party nearby)
2 – Lessee could drill a *profitable* well to offset draining will
*Profitable = expected revenues exceed drilling AND production costs
Remedy for drainage
Damages (royalties lessor would have gotten) PLUS conditional decree or order – drill or forfeit lease
3 Implied Covenants
1 – To protect against drainage
2 – to market
3 – to Develop
*No implied covenant to “EXPLORE”
2 Tests for determining whether M or S owns minerals
1 – old “surface destruction test” – if any reasonable method for producing substance would destroy substance, it belongs to S
2 – “Ordinary and Natural Meaning” test
Steps for Determining Ownership of Minerals
1 – Is it one of the 9 that belongs to surface as matter of law? (building stone, limestone, caliche, surface shale, sand, gravel, water, near surface lignite, iron ore)
2 – If no, look to date of conveyance/severance of M/S:
Pre 6/8/83: surface destruction test
Post 6/8/83: ordinary and natural meaning test
If Co wishes to mine uranium using nondestructive method, even though strip mining is available, who should he lease from, S or M?
Pre 83 = S: if any method destroys, belongs to S
Post 83 = M b/c uranium = “ordinary and natural” mineral BUT must accommodate S if there is reasonable, practical method
Does the dominant mineral estate doctrine apply to hard minerals post 83?
No, mines must pay for surface damage AND accommodate S if there’s a reasonable and practical method
What circumstances trigger use of MIPA?
*Is a Forced Pooling statute
1 – MIPA applies only to fields discovered after 3/8/61
2 – must first make a fair and reasonable offer to pool voluntarily
A leases 40 acres to Co then sells 10 of those acres to B. What does B have?
1 – possibility of reverter in mineral estate
2 – ownership of surface (subject to Co’s reasonable use)
3 – right to delay returns on 10 acres if any
4 – right to royalties from any well on its 10 acres, but not on other 30! (use MIPA)
Duhig Doctrine
Deeds construed against Grantor
- “A to B reserving 1/2 minerals, then B to C reserving 1/2 minerals” will be construed as B reserving A’s 1/2 interest (so B has no mineral rights)
- must say “in addition to any prior mineral reservation”
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G royalties”
Royalty interest in 1/2 of 1/8 = 1/16 of all production
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G produced, marketed and saved”
Royalty interest of 1/2 of production cost free (HUGE! Basically unleasable)
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G in, on, under and that may be produced”
v. common
1/2 Mineral interest = cotenant
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of 1/2 of usual mineral royalties of Blackacre cost free”
Royalty of 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/8 = 1/128
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of O/G in, on or under Blackacre”
½ of mineral interest = cotenant
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G rights, including ½ of bonus, rentals, royalties and profits, but X reserves exec right”
NPMI (nonparticipating mineral interest), owner of ½ mineral interest but X can lease all mineral