Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
48 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Rule of Capture
|
Applies to water, oil, gas
- You get what you drill, even if depletes others - Doesn’t Apply to: 1 – negligently drained oil/gas (blowout) 2 – Illegally drained oil/gas (against Railroad Commission) 3 – stored gas = personal property |
|
Which estate is dominant? Surface or mineral?
|
Mineral = dominant estate
Surface = serviant |
|
As a mineral interest owner, what rights?
|
1 – right to explore, produce and develop minerals
2 – right to vote surface estate as reasonably necessary to develop minerals 3 – right to lease minerals 4- right to develop oil/gas yourself w/o leasing 5 – no duty to develop land/minerals |
|
If O grants an oil and gas lease to Big Oil, what does he receive in return?
|
Bonus, Royalties, Delay Rentals
|
|
When must Mineral owner accommodate Surface owner?
|
1 – S owner has preexisting use of the surface
2 – M owner has a reasonable alterative method of developing oil/gas which is less destructive of the existing surface use but is still economical to M 3 – reasonable alternative is available ON the land (eg, can’t force slantwell) |
|
How long does an oil/gas deed/lease last?
|
Is determinable – can last forever but may expire if there is no production for X # of years
|
|
O conveys Blackacre to X reserving “1/2 of all oil and gas royalties.” What do O and X own?
|
O = NPRI
X = Fee Simple determinable with mineral estate burdened by an NPRI |
|
5 Kinds of Trespass in Oil/Gas and their Remedies
|
1 – ordinary trespass (lease expires = Injunction and damages
2 – Slant well drilling = Injuction and damages 3 – Geophysical or seismic trespass = Sue in assumpsit 4 – Damage to the speculative lease value (showing that land not worth anything, loss of bonus) = Lost bonus 5 – fracturing a well = Injunction and damages |
|
Is authorized secondary recovery operation a trespass?
|
No, public policy favors recovering more o/g BUT can maybe sue for damages
|
|
Slander of Title
|
1 – publication of false claim to title of property
2 – done with malice 3 – resulting in rightful owner losing *specific* sale or lease opportunity b/c no buyer wanted a lawsuit w/ slandering party |
|
What damages for trespass?
|
If bad faith = all losses, no credit for costs
If good faith = credit for reasonable costs that *benefited* rightful owner |
|
General rule for Adverse Possession for Minerals
|
If AP for unsevered estate = gets minerals
If AP of severed surface estate = no minerals |
|
General rule of Cotenancy
|
Every cotenant can drill and produce or lease his undivided share w/o consent but must account to others for their share of profits
|
|
Proportionated reduction clause
|
“If lessor owns an interest less than he has conveyed, royalties and rentals to Lessor reduced proportionately.”
- traditionally Lessor conveys full rights even when only owns portion |
|
Mother Hubbard Clause
|
“Lease also covers and includes all land owned by Lessor adjacent to land described above”
- purpose is to pick up land from mistakes in survey or AP over few inches, etc. |
|
Habendum Clause
|
“This lease remains in effect for __ yrs and as long thereafter as o/g is being produced”
|
|
What typical lease clause would save a lease when no production b/c no pipeline?
|
Shut-in Gas Royalty Clause – pay per well per month royalty = constructive production
|
|
Production in Paying Quantities
|
Determines whether oil producing enough to keep lease in effect
- Revenues – Lessor’s Property – Operating costs |
|
Marginal well doctrine
|
Whether a reasonably prudent operator would continue to operate well to make profit, not just speculation
- Ct gives well reasonable amount of time to demonstrate profitability as long as is producing SOME o/g |
|
Temporary Cessation of Production Doctrine
|
Keeps lease in effect after temporary shutdown
1 – short, temporary shutdown 2 – lessee acts diligently to fix 3 – due to mechanical breakdown “or like” - maybe any reasonably prudent biz decision |
|
What are the 2 equitable inroads to the courts usual strict construction of “production in paying quantities” under the habendum clause?
|
1 – marginal well doctrine
2 – TCOP – temporary cessation of production doctrine |
|
Delay Rental Clause
|
If operations are not commenced before X date, lease terminates UNLESS Lessee pays rentals to delay drilling
|
|
Late Delay Rentals
|
If Lessee doesn’t pay rentals, lease automatically terminates
BUT if Lessor accepts late payment, lessor is estopped from denying validity of lease |
|
If Lessor assigns 1/2 of rights to 3rd party w/o notice to Lessee, and Lessee delivers late delay rentals to Original Lessor, does that revive lease as to 3P?
|
No, they are now cotenants.
|
|
What is needed to have “commercial drilling”?
|
1 – objective physical acts
2 – subjective good faith intent |
|
Pooling clause
|
Allows Lessee to hold several tracks under lease w/ production of just 1 well
- the 1/8 royalty is split among tract owners based on acreage pooled - Lessee can pool all or any acreage under lease - keeps lease alive for ALL land on lease |
|
General Rule for Pooling and NPRIs
|
Executive Right Owner (mineral estate owner w/ right to lease) has no power to pool *Nonparticipating* interests
- so NPRIs get no royalties from pooling well if not on property |
|
What can an NPRI do if land is pooled?
|
Can ratify K and get share of royalties (would get NPRI interest x royalty x percentage of pooled land)
|
|
5 Basics Rules of Divison Order Act
|
- applies to D/O executed after 8/26/91
1 – D/O are binding until revoked 2 – D/O can never contraict or change lease or relieve express/implied obligations 3 – D/O can clarify royalty settlement 4 – Lessee/Payor owing royalties can withhold payments w/o interest ONLY - there is title dispute - payee refuses to sign standard D/O 5 – Lessee/Payor has no right to w/hold payments b/c Lessor refuses to sign D/O w/o authorized standard items |
|
General Rule on D/O
|
D/O is binding until revoked and it can clarify methods of paying royalty but it is not binding to extent changes or contradicts lease
|
|
“Standard” items on D/O
|
1 – effective date of D/O
2 – description of property 3 – fractional or decimal interest and types of interests (mineral, royalty) claimed by payee, w/ title assurances 4 – authority to suspend payments for title disputes 5- provisions for valuation of settlements to the payee |
|
General Rule for Implied Covenants
|
O/G lease contains implied covenants that lessee act as reasonably prudent operator
*NOT a fiduciary standard owed to lessor |
|
Implied Covenant to Protect Against Drainage
|
There must be
1 – substantial drainage (by another party nearby) 2 – Lessee could drill a *profitable* well to offset draining will *Profitable = expected revenues exceed drilling AND production costs |
|
Remedy for drainage
|
Damages (royalties lessor would have gotten) PLUS conditional decree or order – drill or forfeit lease
|
|
3 Implied Covenants
|
1 – To protect against drainage
2 – to market 3 – to Develop *No implied covenant to “EXPLORE” |
|
2 Tests for determining whether M or S owns minerals
|
1 – old “surface destruction test” – if any reasonable method for producing substance would destroy substance, it belongs to S
2 – “Ordinary and Natural Meaning” test |
|
Steps for Determining Ownership of Minerals
|
1 – Is it one of the 9 that belongs to surface as matter of law? (building stone, limestone, caliche, surface shale, sand, gravel, water, near surface lignite, iron ore)
2 – If no, look to date of conveyance/severance of M/S: Pre 6/8/83: surface destruction test Post 6/8/83: ordinary and natural meaning test |
|
If Co wishes to mine uranium using nondestructive method, even though strip mining is available, who should he lease from, S or M?
|
Pre 83 = S: if any method destroys, belongs to S
Post 83 = M b/c uranium = “ordinary and natural” mineral BUT must accommodate S if there is reasonable, practical method |
|
Does the dominant mineral estate doctrine apply to hard minerals post 83?
|
No, mines must pay for surface damage AND accommodate S if there’s a reasonable and practical method
|
|
What circumstances trigger use of MIPA?
|
*Is a Forced Pooling statute
1 – MIPA applies only to fields discovered after 3/8/61 2 – must first make a fair and reasonable offer to pool voluntarily |
|
A leases 40 acres to Co then sells 10 of those acres to B. What does B have?
|
1 – possibility of reverter in mineral estate
2 – ownership of surface (subject to Co’s reasonable use) 3 – right to delay returns on 10 acres if any 4 – right to royalties from any well on its 10 acres, but not on other 30! (use MIPA) |
|
Duhig Doctrine
|
Deeds construed against Grantor
- “A to B reserving 1/2 minerals, then B to C reserving 1/2 minerals” will be construed as B reserving A’s 1/2 interest (so B has no mineral rights) - must say “in addition to any prior mineral reservation” |
|
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G royalties” |
Royalty interest in 1/2 of 1/8 = 1/16 of all production
|
|
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G produced, marketed and saved” |
Royalty interest of 1/2 of production cost free (HUGE! Basically unleasable)
|
|
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G in, on, under and that may be produced” |
v. common
1/2 Mineral interest = cotenant |
|
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of 1/2 of usual mineral royalties of Blackacre cost free” |
Royalty of 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/8 = 1/128
|
|
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of O/G in, on or under Blackacre” |
½ of mineral interest = cotenant
|
|
Royalty or Mineral interest? What fraction?
“1/2 of all O/G rights, including ½ of bonus, rentals, royalties and profits, but X reserves exec right” |
NPMI (nonparticipating mineral interest), owner of ½ mineral interest but X can lease all mineral
|