Test And Measures

Front 1

WISC-V

Back 1

Weschler intelligence scale for children five. Ages 6.0-16.11. 60 minutes and normed on 2200 children.

Front 2

What is the FSIQ

Back 2

Most reliable score, predictor of important life outcomes and derived from the sum of 7 subtext scores. Its the most representative of global intellectual functioning.

Front 3

What causes differwnce in IQ

Back 3

Heritability and environmental factors such as early ezposure to language, proper nutrition, and intellectual stimulation.

Front 4

WAIS-IV

Back 4

Ages 16-90.11, 60-90 minutes. Normed on 2200. Yeils FSIQ and 4 index scales.

Front 5

VCI

Back 5

Similarities, vocabulary, and information

Front 6

WMI

Back 6

Digit span, and arithmetic

Front 7

PSI

Back 7

Symbol search and coding

Front 8

PRI

Back 8

Block design, matrix reasoning, and visual spacing

Front 9

WPPSI-IV

Back 9

Measures cognitive development for preschoolers and young children. Age 2.6-7.7. 60-90 minutes. Normed on 1700.

Front 10

WIAT-III

Back 10

Achievement test for clinical, educational, and research settings, ages 4.0-50.11. Time differes depending on grade level 60-120 minutes. Normed on 2200 16-90.11.

Front 11

Standford binet 5

Back 11

Popular for testing for giftedness to get into tag and private schools. 2.0-85+. About 60 minuted, normed on 4800. 10 subsets: 5 nonverbal, 5 verbal, fsiq

Front 12

WASI-II

Back 12

Brief, measure of cognitive ability. Screens for intellectual disability and giftedness. Ages 6.0-90.11. 15-30 minutes. 2,300 individuals.

Front 13

The 5 cognitive factors

Back 13

Fluid reasoning, quantitative, knowledge, visual spacial, working memory

Front 14

What did Robert Yerkes do

Back 14

Chaired the committee on psychological examination of recruits and created intelligence tests for WWI. Called the Army Alpha Beta. 1.5 million recruits

Front 15

Myers briggs

Back 15

Used for hiring to determine fit. 16 personality types based on 4 dichotomies.

Front 16

Malingering

Back 16

Faking to get out of trouble.

Front 17

Feigning

Back 17

Faking without a motive, for attention

Front 18

Miller foresnic assessment test (M-FAST)

Back 18

Short 25 item interview. Used to determine feigning

Front 19

Test

Back 19

A tool, standardized, normed

Front 20

Assessment

Back 20

Multiple components, including tests, clinical interview, questionnaires, IQ and personality tests.

Front 21

What is intelligence

Back 21

the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience

Front 22

Advantages of a high IQ

Back 22

necessary for highly complex or fluid jobs,

Front 23

How did David Wechsler describe intelligence

Back 23

the global capacity of a person to act purposefully, to think rationally, and deal effectively with his environment

Front 24

The primary scale includes

Back 24

verbal communication, visual spatial, working memory, fluid reasoning, processing speed

Front 25

the ancillary scale includes

Back 25

vocabulary acquisition, nonverbal index, general ability index, cognitive proficeiency

Front 26

fluid reasoning

Back 26

measures ability to use inductive and deductive reasoning while solving both verbal and nonverbal problems

Front 27

knowledge

Back 27

assesses understanding of general info, vocab, social behavioral standards, and common sense that individuals within the same age range are also expected to know

Front 28

quanitative

Back 28

assesses an individuals abilities with basic math concepts as well as pattering, sequencing, ordering, classifying, comparing, and numerical problem solving skills

Front 29

visual spatial

Back 29

measures ability to identify patters, relationships, spatial orientations, and how individual pieces relate to whole images on display as well as solve problems using pictures, diagrams, shapes, and maps or tables

Front 30

working memory

Back 30

assesses ability to access info just seen or heard and how that data is inspected, transformed or sorted when answering a question or solving a problem such as repeating number and letter sequences in order, tapping blocks in a predetermined pattern or identifying visual and verbal absurdities

Front 31

how many hours did participants report spend conducting assessments

Back 31

6

Front 32

how many hours were spent scoring assesments

Back 32

6.5

Front 33

what percentage of participants didn't conduct assesment

Back 33

20 percent

Front 34

how much of direct practice was spent conducting assesments

Back 34

24 percent

Front 35

who spent more time conducting assesments

Back 35

forensic psychologists 50 percent compared to 27 percent in non forensic setting

Front 36

how many hours a week did 17 percent of psychologists spend on assessments

Back 36

10