• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/16

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

16 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Public Opinion
- attitude vs. opinion
- cross section vs. social process
- self-interest
- events
- opinion leaders
- media
Life Cycle of an Issue
- definition of the issue
- involvement of opinion leaders
- public awareness
- government/regulatory involvement
- resolution
Early Ideas
- magic bullet/hypodermic
- payne fund study
- war of the words
- hovland: psychology based, individual difference theory
- lazarsfeld: sociology based: social category theory, opinion leaders
Opinion Leaders
- 10% - 12% of population
- highly interested
- better informed
- early adopter
- good organizer
Opinion Leaders
- formal: power leaders
- informal
- 2-step flow
- multiple-step flow: media>OL>attentive>inattentive
Role of Mass Media
- PR role: gandy, 50% media from PR
- klapper: limited effects
- agenda-setting: mass media not good at telling us what to think, very good at telling us what to think about: cohen
* second level agenda setting: set agenda and set of attributes
Role of Mass Media
- media dependency theory: more powerful media: no prior info, cannot verify
- framing theory: how facts, themes, treatment frame story
* media framing; PR framing
* how audience frames
* iyengar and kinder: prime: how audience is primed to think
* romney vs. obama example
- conflict theory: controversy can build consensus
The Dominant View of PR
- dominant view: gandy: PR is purposeful, self-interested communication (for client)
- bernays: engineering of consent
- change, crystallize, retain
- use of persuassion
- greeks: ethos (source credibility); logos (logical arguement); pathos (emotional appeal)
6 Principles of Persuasion: Robert Cialdini
- liking: like those who like them: tupperware
- reciprocity: people repay in kind: disabled american vets
- social proof: people follow the lead of others: lost wallet
- consistency: people fulfill written, public and voluntary commitments: sign, follow-up on pledge
- authority: people defer to experts who provide shortcuts requiring specialized information: NY times expert, 4% shift
- scarcity: people value what's scarce: beef shortage, order jump 600%
Formulating Persuasive Messages
- yes-yes
- offer structured choices
- seek partial commitment
- ask for more, settle for less
Factors in Persuasive Communication
- audience analysis: know audience; demos and psychographics; VALS ex. turkey
* survivors/sustainers; belongers; achievers
* channeling: match media to audience ex. achievers/gourmet magazine
- source credibility: ethos calif strawberry board
* expertise
* sincerity
* charisma
* problems with celebrities: too many; overexposure; actions undercut product; speak out, conflict
Factors in Persuasive Communication
- appeal to self-interest: get in return:
- self-esteem
- contribution to society
- recognition from peers, community
- sense of belonging
- ego gratification
- tax deduction
Factors in Persuasive Communication
- clarity of message: will they understand; what do I want them to do?
- timing and context: conservation in january, heat bill
- audience participation: involve, trial, UGC
- suggestions for action: pacific G&L: zero interest, kit, service bureau, ZIP
Factors in Persuasive Communication
- content and structure of messages
- drama: humanize, application, story, case study technique; BB/BS latch key kid
- statistics: caterpillar truck
- surveys and polls: customer satisfaction; 3rd party
- examples: school bond needs
- testimonials: user of product
- endorsements: third party; ADA
- emotional appeals: watch guilt, fear arousal; moderate fear, solution; humane society
Persuasion and Manipulation: Limitations of Persuasion
- lack of message penetration
- competing messages
- self selection
- self perception
The Ethics of Persuasion
- need for ethical responsibility
- ultimately good business
- health: message is already suspect; unethical actions don't serve best interests of the client